Title: Research Methods in Psychology Behavioral Medicine Psy 314
1Research Methods in PsychologyBehavioral
Medicine Psy 314
- William P. Wattles, Ph.D..
- Francis Marion University
2Empirical
- a. Relying on or derived from observation or
experiment empirical results that supported the
hypothesis. - b. Verifiable or provable by means of observation
or experiment empirical laws.
3Faith Healing gone bad
- NYT 8/29 8-year old died of prayer service
intended to save him.
4Good science versus bad science
- Alternative explanations.
5Seven Signs of Voodoo Science
- 1. The discoverer pitches the claim directly to
the media. - 2. The discoverer says a powerful establishment
is suppressing his work. - 3. The effect is at the very limit of detection.
- 4. Evidence for the discovery is anecdotal.
6Seven Signs of Voodoo Science
- 5. The discoverer says a belief is credible
because it has endured for centuries. - 6. The discoverer has worked in isolation.
- 7. New laws of nature are proposed to explain the
observation.
7The Case Study
- A. Widely used, easy to implement.
- B. Allows for a thorough analysis of the
subject. Useful when phenomena is rare or new - C. Provides a description
- D. May disconfirm uniform assumptions
- E. Useful for hypothesis generation.
-
8Disadvantages of case study
- a. Can confuse the individual and the disorder.
- b. Cannot generalize from this idiographic
(individual) data or to nomothetic ( general)
9Idiographic vs. Nomothetic data
- Idiographic refers to the individual.
- Nomothetic - Of or relating to the study or
discovery of general scientific laws. - When we use nomothetic data we gain and. We lose
specificity to the individual but we gain in that
we can now generalize to others.
10Correlation
- Observation only
- Relationship one tends to follow the other
- text correlation indicates how similar the
scores are. - In general when one increases the other increases
and vice versa.
11Correlation
- The relationship between two variables X and Y.
- In general, are changes in X associated with
Changes in Y? - If so we say that X and Y covary.
- We can observe correlation by looking at a
scatter plot.
12(No Transcript)
13Type of correlation
- Positive correlation. The two change in a similar
direction. Individuals below average on X tend
to be below average on Y and vice versa. - Negative correlation the two change in the
opposite direction. Individuals who are above
average on X tend to be below average on Y and
vice versa.
14Examples
- Positive correlations Hours spent studying and
g.p.a. height and weight, exam 1 score and exam
2 score, Obesity and type2 diabetes,
hypertension, asthma - Negative correlations temperature and heating
bills hours spent watching TV and g.p.a. SAT
median and taking the test.
15Correlation Coefficient
- One number that tells us about the strength and
direction of the relationship between X and Y. - Has a value from -1.0 (perfect negative
correlation) to 1.0 (perfect positive
correlation) - Perfect correlations do not occur in nature
16Strength of Correlation
- Weak .10, .20, .30
- Moderate .40,.50, .60
- Strong .70, .80, .90
- No correlation 0.0
17Advantages of Correlation
- Relatively simple to do.
- Involves observation not manipulation
18Disadvantages of Correlation
- CORRELATION DOES NOT IMPLY CAUSATION
19Correlation
- Measures of health for nations correlate with the
number of televisions.
20- Obesity increased with popularity of low-fat
diet. - More Driving
- Less walking
- Larger portions
- More computes
21EXPERIMENT
- Experimenter Control (manipulation)
- Independent variable
- Dependent variable
- Two or more groups
- experimental group
- control group
- Random assignment
22Independent Variable
- Under control of the experimenter
- Used to explain changes in the dependent variable
- Example Type of instruction
- Should include a control group
23Dependent Variable
- Not under control by the experimenter
- Presumed to be caused or affected by the
independent variable - Example grade on final exam
24Random Assignment
- Essential aspect of experiment
- Allows us to control for all potential confounds
- Each subject has an equal chance of being in each
group. - Intact groups not random
- Replication to deal with chance variation
25EXPERIMENT
- Double-blind
- to avoid social expectations
- to avoid demand characteristics
- External validity-extent to which we can
generalize - Analogue-animals, cold water immersion as stress
26Example of Experiment
- New York Times 9/1/2009
- The Claim Chamomile Can Soothe a Colicky Baby.
27Randomized Clinical Trial
- Independent Variable
- Treatment group
- Chamomile tea
- Control Group
- Other tea
- Dependent Variable
- Presence of colic
28Randomized Clinical Trial
- Results
- Treatment group 57 percent better
- Control group 26 percent better
29Advantage of Experiment
- Can talk about one variable causing another.
30Dose Response Relationship
- A direct, consistent association between an
independent variable, such as a behavior, and a
dependent variable, such as a disease.
31Studies over time
- Cross-sectional studies-conducted during only one
point in time. - Longitudinal studies follow participants over an
extend time period.
32Reliability
- Does the test measure consistently?
- text The degree to which test scores are free
from errors of measurement - Reliability is necessary but not sufficient
33Measurement Error
- Measurement error is always present
- Anything affecting the test score that does not
relate to the issue of interest. - response tendency
- social desirability
- text Variation in scores not due to changes in
the targeted characteristic.
34Validity
- Does the test measure what it is supposed to
measure?
35Concurrent Validity
- A type of criterion validity
- Concurrent means at the same time
- Correlate results of one measure with another
variable - measured at the same time.
- expected to be related
- Example stress profile correlated to medical
history.
36Predictive Validity
- Another type of Criterion validity
- Can the test predict something it should be able
to predict? - Example, stress profile did not predict symptoms,
physician visits or self-perceptions of health
37Anti-doping agency seeks test
- A pretty good test is better than no test.
- Bad science
- Positive results from six race specimens must be
unreliable because he gave six others that tested
negative. - there are certainly false positives.
- After exercise 5 were false positives
38Test Accuracy
39New York Times
- The article relates to health psychology in that
it shows an example of error of measurement. - Music in the recovery room has a direct
connection to health psychology because its a
cognitive distraction it takes the patients
mind and attention away from the current
situation and possible pain.
40New York Times
- This is an example of positive correlation. The
higher (heavier) the woman, the higher (deadlier)
the cancer - This article relates to Health Psychology
because it explains the correlation between the
occurance of strokes and the time of day.
41New York Times
- The article talks about how people's mind and
behaviors try to compensate for the idea that
there is supposedly less nicotine in light
products. - High officials emphasizing the importance of
primary prevention can create a healthier society.
42Epidemiology
- Branch of medicine that investigates the
frequency and distribution of disease and related
factors. - Important in SARS epidemic
43Epidemiology
- Prevalence-the proportion of the population that
has a particular disease at a specific time. - Incidence-measures the frequency of new cases of
the disease.
44Epidemiology
- Determine the etiology or origins of a specific
disease. To develop and test hypotheses. - Discovering who is more likely to have a disease
is useful in determining its cause. SARS as an
example - Discovering risk factors such as dirty water or
smoking.
45Epidemiology
- Mortality- Death rate
- Morbidity-The rate of incidence of a disease.
46Epidemiology
- A risk factor is any characteristic or condition
that occurs with greater frequency in people with
a disease than it does in people free from the
disease.
47Epidemiology
- Presence of a risk factor increases the
likelihood of developing the illness.
48Epidemiology
- Relative versus absolute risk.Relative
Considered in comparison with something else - Relative risk the ratio of incidence or
prevalence in the exposed group to that of the
unexposed group - Absolute risk-The persons chances of developing a
disease.
49- Test A
- If around 1,000 people have this test every 2
years, 1 person will be saved from dying from
this cancer every 10 years. - Â
- Test B
- If you have this test every 2 years, it will
reduce your chance of dying from this cancer from
around 3 in 1, 000 to 2 in 1,000 over the next 10
years. - Â
- Test C
- If you have this test every 2 years , it will
reduce your chance of dying from this cancer by
around one third over the next 10 years.
50Relative Risk
- If you have this test every 2 years , it will
reduce your chance of dying from this cancer by
around one third over the next 10 years.
51Absolute risk
- If you have this test every 2 years, it will
reduce your chance of dying from this cancer from
around 3 in 1, 000 to 2 in 1,000 over the next 10
years.
52Number needed to treat
- If around 1,000 people have this test every 2
years, 1 person will be saved from dying from
this cancer every 10 years.
53Absolute Risk vs. Relative Risk
- Example New York Times Nov. 08
54Relative Risk 4/850
Absolute risk 8 reduced to 4 A decrease of 4
points or 4 people per hundred
55Quality of care data
- NYT 9/3/04
- More than 98 percent of hospitals in the United
States are reporting quality-of-care data for
treating heart attack, heart failure and
pneumonia, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid
Services said yesterday.
56Clinton heart bypass
- During Heart bypass surgery blood vessels are
taken from elsewhere in the body, often the leg,
and sewn in to create detours around coronary
artery blockages - 516,000 were performed in 2001
57Quality of care data
- Clinton hospital 3.93 deaths per hundred versus
2.18 for coronary bypass overall in NY. - Correlational data but they control for 45 risk
factors.
58Over interpreting data
- Side air bags Reduce the risk of dying in half
- 157/100,000 with side air bags
- 248/100,000 without side air bags
59The End