Title: Low Luminosity Opportunities
1Low Luminosity Opportunities
Andrew Brandt, U. Texas at Arlington
really hard
easy
DØ ADM November 18, 2005
2Context
- FPD fiber trigger now working, gives possibility
of unique data samples - FPD will only operate routinely up until
shutdown, primarily due to increased luminosity
expected after shutdown (lt3.5 months of
operations left) - Low lum period gives opportunity to maximize
- diffractive physics during a period of
limited use - to rest of experiment
-
3Low Luminosity Proposal I
- Run with injection tune (?1.6m), 1 p on 4 pbar
- (originally 2x4 but CDF not interested), no low
? - squeeze, collisions by ramping down
- separator voltages. This particular
configuration - is required to minimize setup time and extra
- collisions.
- Note If we collide P1 and A1 at DØ, P1 will
collide with A2 60m later (at D1) - with A3 120m later, with A4 180m later.
- If we collide P4 with A4, P4 will collide with A1
180m earlier (C side), etc. - They (AD) have some tricks to lop off last or
first bunch, may be able to scrape - other bunches (theyre thinking about it). Duncan
is looking at timing to - understand which scenario best. Any implications
at DØ, lum calc? trigger?
4Low Lum Proposal I High ?
- Why Can move pots to much lower t-values (high
? means fatter beams - at IP and not as fat at pots)
-
- Physics goals Low-t elastic scattering (map out
dip region), low-t single - diffractive and double pomeron. Totally unique
data samples. Possibility - of total cross section measurement.
- Stats needed Minimum one store (estimate 1-2
nb-1 for a store) - uncertainties in initial lum and pot positions
make predictions difficult. - Proposal Take one store at beginning of two week
period, look at data - and if justified take more data in second week
5Elastic t distribution
t range accessible with injection tune
6Total Cross Section
7Total Cross Section Study
Key issues Low enough t for extrapolation Suffici
ent elastics (need 50-100k to have a chance at
2mb error) estimate 300k assuming tmin.15 (50
trigger, 50 f) Inelastic counting (assume
2) Emittance (5-10?)
8Luminosity Uncertainty
Brendan says scenario 1 --------------- -we
measure cross section half way between CDF and
E811 with comparable errors - exactly same
experimental error as now The luminosity error
would decrease from 6.5 down to about
6 scenario 2 --------------- -we measure a
cross section consistent with CDF with comparable
errors - a new Tevatron average is formed using
only CDF and D0 -exactly same experimental errors
as now The luminosity error would decrease to 5
Alternate Scenario (not Brendan) adopt DØ
uncertainty since it would be the only one at
current energy error drops to 4 to 4.5
9Double Pomeron
2nb-1100ubacctrig eff 2000100.1.510000
events? Could be used to distinguish different
models of pomeron (phi correlations of p and pbar
for example A. Kupco, R. Peschanski, C. Royon,
Phys. Lett. B606 (2005) 139
10Low Luminosity Proposal II
- Run with ?0.28 m at low lum (few E30)
- (This is equivalent to CDF proposal)
- Why 0 multiple interactions, low halo allows
closer pot positions, intermediate t - Physics goals calibrate ? from gaps with ? from
protons (this allows for example double pomeron
with trackgap, improving acceptance) - gap/cal studies in low MI environment
- alignment/calibration for full data sample
(using large elastic sample) - intermediate t-sample for physics
- Stats needed 1-2 stores depending on pot
positions, lum - Proposal take one store at beginning of two week
period, look at data and if justified take more
data in second week
11Low Luminosity Luminosity
CDF
Expect 40-100 nb-1 for a 24 hour store
12CDF Low Luminosity Proposal
Context Tokyo pots will be removed during
shutdown in favor of collimators to protect
silicon
13Summary
- Request two types of stores to take advantage
of FPD capabilities during a rare - lowish luminosity running period
- I) High ? for low-t elasticdiffraction
- II) Low luminosity for 0 MI calibration sample
and intermediate t -
-