Guided Practice in TechnologyBased Summary Writing - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 27
About This Presentation
Title:

Guided Practice in TechnologyBased Summary Writing

Description:

Passive reading strategies often an obstacle to deep learning: ... just muddle through, hoping the comprehension problems will eventually resolve themselves. ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:25
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 28
Provided by: eileenk4
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Guided Practice in TechnologyBased Summary Writing


1
Guided Practice in Technology-Based Summary
Writing
  • Donna Caccamise, Eileen Kintsch, Marita Franzke,
    Angela Eckhoff
  • and Walter Kintsch
  • University of Colorado

2
Summary Street Research Group
  • Meghan Tobias
  • Maryanne DeHart
  • Angela Eckhoff
  • Diana Rangl

3
Overview
  • Introduction guided practice approach
  • Review of research findings
  • Effects of Summary Street use on quality of
    written summaries
  • Transfer to independent summary writing
  • Impact on metacognition
  • General conclusions

4
Background
  • Successful decoding does not guarantee good
    comprehension
  • Passive reading strategies often an obstacle to
    deep learning
  • Texts that are deceptively easy to read - short
    sentences, familiar words - may give a false
    sense of understanding.
  • When faced with texts with difficult to grasp
    concepts and unfamiliar vocabulary, many students
    just muddle through, hoping the comprehension
    problems will eventually resolve themselves.

5
Background, cont.
  • In contrast, expert readers rely on active
    problem solving
  • Paraphrase, restate the meaning in their own
    words
  • Clarify unfamiliar terms and concepts
  • Use the rhethorical structure to build a
    macrostructure
  • Self explain difficult ideas
  • Find analogies
  • Visualize
  • Predict outcomes, and so on
  • How to get non-expert readers to adopt these
    active reading strategies is the problem
    addressed here.

6
Different pathways to expert reading
  • Some get it on their own - kids who read a lot
    with deep interest in certain topics
  • Direct instruction of good comprehension
    strategies
  • Live interventions
  • Automated ones
  • Guided practice is an important component of all
    these interventions - scaffold the process
  • Summary Street environment depends entirely on
    this approach.

7
Summary Street - an environment for guided
practice
  • Direct instruction plays a minimal role, if at
    all Use of guidelines for how to summarize is
    optional, often ignored.
  • Summary writing, through the development of
    macrostructure, builds a foundation for learning
    new content.
  • Students are guided via feedback on content as
    they work to improve their summaries through
    several iterations.

8
Summary Street Feedback
  • Content feedback
  • - does the summary contain the right content?
  • - enough information on each of the main
  • topics?
  • - does it include redundant sentences?
  • - sentences that are not relevant to the topic,
    or
  • too detailed?
  • - sentences that are copied from the text?
  • Additional feedback on length and spelling errors

9
(No Transcript)
10
Research findings
  • Summary Street does improve the quality of
    students written summaries.
  • Franzke et al. study with 8th graders
  • The beneficial effects of practice with Summary
    Street also transfer to independent summary
    writing.
  • Pre-post summaries from Grades 7, 8, 9
  • Does knowledge about how to summarize emerge from
    guided practice in summary writing?
  • Think-aloud study with college students

11
1. Effect on summary quality
  • Procedure 8th-grade students summarized texts
    with SS or word processor during twice weekly
    sessions over 4-week period.
  • Students students completed summaries of 6 texts
    on average.
  • Texts formed a sequence acc. to difficulty.

12
Summary quality, cont.
  • Summary Street summaries covered content better
    and maintained high scores as texts became more
    difficult, fewer details.
  • Especially effective for medium-to-low performing
    students.

13
(No Transcript)
14
(No Transcript)
15
(No Transcript)
16
Summary Quality Data Conclusions
  • Practicing summary writing is a valuable
    activity, but students do better when guided
    through the process.
  • Summary Street provides individualized feedback
    that lets students debug many writing problems on
    their own.
  • The task of getting the right content is
    challenging and supportive environment helps
    students succeed.

17
2. Independent summary writing
  • The beneficial effects of practice with Summary
    Street also transfer to independent summary
    writing.
  • Pre-post summaries from Grades 7, 8, 9

18
(No Transcript)
19
(No Transcript)
20
(No Transcript)
21
3. Think-aloud study
  • Does knowledge about how to summarize emerge from
    guided practice in summary writing?
  • Think-aloud study with college students

22
Procedure
  • Undergraduate students provided oral reports
    while using Summary Street or a word processor to
    summarize texts 10 each
  • 4 texts (1200-2000 words) on different sources of
    energy (coal, biomass, hydropower, propane) -
    same order
  • Told to revise at least 3 times.

23
Scoring
  • TA comments classified into 3 main categories
    indicating metacognitive thinking
  • Evaluation
  • Planning
  • Regulation

24
Significant Findings
Summary Street
Control M M Strategy
(SD)
(SD) F Total Strategy Use Total Strategy
84.1
61.1 Use
(12.7) (29.4) p .05, p
.025, p .01
25
Significant Findings Cont.
Summary Street Control M
M F STRATEGY
Evaluation Strategies Monitor Task
Performance 19.8 8.3 Planning
Strategies Employ Macro Strategies 1.9
.5 Regulation
Strategies Monitor Record Use 1.1
0 Transform Written Text
8.3 3.1
26
Metacognitive data Conclusions
  • Both groups engaged in an equivalent number of
    revision cycles
  • Summary Street 4 cycles. Control 3 cycles
  • But Summary Street users employed planning,
    regulation and evaluation strategies at a
    significantly higher rate than did control
    participants.
  • Summary Street feedback that targets problems
    with the content of students summaries also
    encourages more metacognitive reflectivity.

27
General Conclusions
  • Summary writing is a valuable learning activity
    because it helps readers build a coherent
    textbase understanding, which is the foundation
    for true learning.
  • We dont think that these macrostrategies must
    necessarily be explicitly taught.
  • We believe that all pathways to expertise require
    a great deal of practice.
  • However practice alone does not make perfect.
    Practice is more effective when guided by an
    intelligent, or even a semi-intelligent agent
    like Summary Street.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com