Comenius-project MEPWED - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 43
About This Presentation
Title:

Comenius-project MEPWED

Description:

6 countries (3 Geneurations, Eline, E-Uth) MICTEP (Methodology to implement ICT in European ... Personal communication = socialising. Priority ONE : MSN, mail ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:27
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 44
Provided by: hhartin
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Comenius-project MEPWED


1
International projects using web based tools
"Midnight Sun" Course Ludo Mateusen
2
30 MINUTES
SLIDES
3
Experiences Comenius project 6 countries (3
Geneurations, Eline, E-Uth) MICTEP (Methodology
to implement ICT in European project work)
4
European projectwork?
5
Content Organisation Multi-media
1. Aims 6. International teams of students 11. Pictures
2. Themes 7. Appropriate web based tools 12. Movies
3. Methodology 8. Communication and Collaboration 13. Audio
4. Curriculum 9. Clear written guidelines
5. Involvement students 10. Marks, certification
6
Common aims??
7
Content 1. Aims. Do partners have common aims?
  • Attitude
  • Respect other cultures, fighting prejudices,
    awareness own identity
  • Knowledge
  • Linguistic, subject based, other cultures
  • Skills
  • Methodological working autonomously, doing
    research, group work
  • ICT
  • Linguistic
  • Personal development

8
Content 2. Themes
  • General multi-disciplinary theme subtopics
  • Subject based
  • Interesting for students
  • Relevant
  • Intercultural dialogue (priority LLL
  • Cultural heritage
  • Environment / energy
  • Work experience etc..

9
Content 2. Example themes
  • Saving energy
  • Types of energy
  • Every days life
  • Life begins, weddings, life ends
  • Celebrations
  • Religious, personal, political, national

10
Content 2. Example theme Sport
  • Addiction
  • Mens sana in corpore sano
  • Dangerous sports
  • Sport and health
  • Advertisements
  • Nationalism
  • Hooliganism
  • Sport and TV
  • National sports
  • Sport at school

11
Content 3. Methodology
  • Description. What, how?
  • Description (what,how) comparison
    differencies/similarities
  • Description (what, how) research question. Why?

12
Content 3. Methodology. Research questions
  • Sport and health
  • Main questions
  • Does sport always contribute to a better
  • health?
  • Subquestions
  • How do sport contribute to a better health?
  • Which sports do contribute well/not well?
  • Doping, training and food etc..
  • Conclusion/recommendations

13
Content 3. Methodology. Description
  • 3 GenEUrations. Subtopic. Gender related roles
  • Main question
  • In what respects have the relations between men
    and women changed with reference to roles and
    opportunities?
  • Subquestions
  • Are there differences in upbringing of boys and
    girls?
  • Are there differences in the ways boys and girls
    spend their spare time and the way they get along
    with their friends?
  • Conclusion

14
Content 4. Linked to curriculum?
  • LLL-programme
  • How will the activities be integrated into the
    curriculum?
  • Which subjects of the curriculum will be
    concerned?
  • (How many hours, lessons, marks given etc..)
  • Schools can have different subjects
  • Example ELINE
  • Nl history social sciences IT English
  • No social sciences Be IT-lessons
  • Ge English, social sciences Ir transition
    year

15
Content 5. Involvement students
  • Personal presentations
  • Brainstorming subtopics
  • Local research interviews, literature, lessons
  • National reports (fomats given)
  • International report. Comparison

16
Content 5. Phase Research
17
Content 5. Phase Research Interview in Ierland
18
Content 5. Phase Local reports Germany ethics
years 50
19
Content 5. Phase Local reports Families 50 Italy
20
Organisation 6. International teams of students
  • Divide class in smaller groups
  • Mixed international groups work on same subtopics
  • Two schools E-Twinning / exchanges
  • Minimum three schools Comenius/LLL (see
    ELINE/food)
  • Innovative option
  • Teacher is responsible for the work of the
    students in his/her school
  • The Topic Coordinator is responsible for the
    work in his/her international topic group

21
Organisation 7. Appropriate web based tools
  • E- mail
  • Websites
  • Chat/discussion forum
  • Electronic (or virtual or digital) learning
    environment (contains different tools)
  • Moodle, Dokeos, Teletop, Fronter? Blackboard
  • Web 2.0 tools (from information to communication)
  • Weblogs, wikis, community tools
  • Project based environments
  • Ejournals, Magazine Factory etc..

22
Organisation 7. Criteria ICT- tools for
international group work
  • General information (assignments, deadlines..)
  • Communication and collaboration between S
  • Monitoring students work T
  • Structuring of the project T
  • Easy to use S T

23
Organisation 7. ICT-Tools.
24
Organisation 7. ICT-Tools. Information,
communication and collaboration
Information Communication Collaboration
Unilateral Bi/multilateral Bi/multilateral
To show your own product To compare different products To create a common product
25
Information Communication Collaboration Monitoring students Sructuring by teacher Easy to use T Easy to use S
E-mail Information xxx Communication xxx Collaboration xx Monitoring x Structuring x xxx / xxx
website Information xxx Communication - Collaboration - Monitoring Structuring xxx _
Web 2.0 tools Information xxx Communication xxx Collaboration xxx Monitoring xxx Structuring x xxx / xxx
Ele (forum) Information xxx Communication (forum) xxx Collaboration x Monitoring xxx structuring xxx x / xx
ejournals Information xxx Communication x Collaboration xxx Monitoring xxx structuring xxx xx / xxx
26
Organisation 7. ICT-Tools. Structuring
Chronological
Management
THEMATIC
27
Organisation 7. ICT-Tools. Structuring
Chronological
Mixed use
THEMATIC
28
Organisation 8. Communication and collaboration
  • Communication tools of S
  • Synchronous MSN, Skype
  • Asynchronous mail
  • Personal communication socialising.
  • Priority ONE MSN, mail
  • Communication about project (in eJournal)
  • Live Online (audio)
  • Internal message system (mail)
  • Comments (simple forum)
  • Shared article

B A L A N CE
29
Organisation 9. Clear agreements
  • Clear written outline created jointly by partners
  • Content
  • Aims/subtopics/formats of articles
  • Stages of the project
  • Realistic time scales calendar
  • Common evaluation tools

30
Organisation 9. Model of phases of a project
  • Personal presentations
  • Preparation of the research OWNERSHIP
  • offering choices, brainstorming, making
    subquestions
  • Local researchinterviews, literature, lessons
  • National reports
  • International report. Comparison
  • Evaluation. Selfevaluation and marks

31
Organisation 9. Phases
Structure
Phase Presentations
32
Organisation 9. Phase Brainstorming
Phase Common agreements on what to do.
33
Organisation 9 Calendar
34
Organisation 9 Deadlines
35
Evaluation control ??
36
Organisation 9. Common evaluation
  • Evaluation self evaluation
  • Select a small set common aims to be evaluated
  • MICE (Model instruments common evaluation)
  • Involve students and teachers
  • Use diferent instruments (not always
    questionaires)
  • Ready-to-use questionnaires available in
    eJournals?

37
Organisation 9. Common evaluation Involve students
  • Foto van evaluatie vergadering

38
Organisation 10. Certification, marks
  • Marks if part of the curriculum
  • Marks for gained competences??
  • Marks for languages??
  • Certificate
  • Part of portfolio

39
(No Transcript)
40
Characteristics
Content Organisation Multi-media
1. Aims 6. International teams of students 11. Pictures
2. Themes 7. Appropriate web based tools 12. Movies
3. Methodology 8. Communication and Collaboration 13. Audio
4. Curriculum 9. Clear written guidelines
5. Final products 10. Marks, certification
41
Multi-media
  • Pictures, audio, video see workshops
  • Pictures tell a story
  • Audio and video additional tools
  • Added value for communication and content
  • Cultural differences
  • Privacy issues

42
Conclusion The more virtual, the more
structured and well organised
  • Ownership pupils
  • Creativity and visualisation
  • Communication and collaboration
  • Innovative tools
  • Marks
  • Structuring/monitoring teachers
  • Linked to curriculum

M I X
43
Your own conclusion??
  • Please, write down three main conclusions
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com