FAMILY PSYCHOEDUCATION PROGRAMME: SOUTH LEE MENTAL HEALTH SERVICES - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 21
About This Presentation
Title:

FAMILY PSYCHOEDUCATION PROGRAMME: SOUTH LEE MENTAL HEALTH SERVICES

Description:

This part of the presentation will look at: 1. The evidence-base for family psycho-education programmes ... The research study was a fixed pre-post-test design. ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:61
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 22
Provided by: Bra131
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: FAMILY PSYCHOEDUCATION PROGRAMME: SOUTH LEE MENTAL HEALTH SERVICES


1
FAMILY PSYCHO-EDUCATION PROGRAMME SOUTH LEE
MENTAL HEALTH SERVICES
  • MARIAN BRADY BSW MA CBT.
  • SOCIAL WORKER ADULT MENTAL HEALTH

2
INTRODUCTION PART B EVIDENCE, RESEARCH FINDINGS
RECOMMENDATIONS
  • This part of the presentation will look at
  • 1. The evidence-base for family psycho-education
    programmes
  • 2. Findings from the evaluation of our 2008
    programme
  • 3. Recommendations from the research

3
PREVIOUS RESEARCH EVIDENCE FOR THE EFFICACY OF
FAMILY PSYCHOEDUCATION
  • The present available research studies (most
    recent meta-analysis by Lincoln et al., 2007)
    consistently demonstrate that when treatment is
    integrated with antipsychotic medication AND
    family psycho-education, there is
  • a significant reduction in short-term rate of
    relapse,
  • an increase in the therapeutic link with the
    service and
  • a reduction in caregiver burden

4
WHAT DOES THE RESEARCH TELL US?
  • Psycho-education solely to individuals with
    schizophrenia ineffective
  • Size of effect on relapse and re-hospitalisation
    comparable to medication / CBT
  • Effective in reducing negative communication
  • Effective in generalising knowledge-gain
  • Effective for symptom monitoring
  • Effective for relapse while symptoms stable

5
IMPLICATIONS FOR MENTAL HEALTH SERVICES
  • The additional effort of integrating relatives
    into treatment is definitely worthwhile. This
    suggests that mental health services should be
    much more prepared to actively include families
    in the treatment and management of their
    relatives with schizophrenia.

6
SOUTH LEE FAMILY PSYCHO-EDUCATION RESEARCH
PROGRAMME 2008
  • Research Design
  • The research study was a fixed pre-post-test
    design. It measured the effects of the programme
    before-after on
  • participant distress, and
  • participant knowledge on schizophrenia
  • A satisfaction questionnaire was also
    administered after the programme in order to
    identify which components within the programme
    the families found most helpful.

7
THE MEASUREMENTS
  • GENERAL HEALTH QUESTIONNAIRE (GHQ-12)
  • Screening instrument for distress detection. It
    is a validated screening instrument used
    throughout the world. It measures psychological
    distress and social difficulties.
  • KNOWLEDGE ON SCHIZOPHRENIA FAMILY QUESTIONNAIRE
  • Measures knowledge on the understanding of
    schizophrenia across six domains (aetiology,
    symptoms, demography, treatment, hospital
    procedures, and coping).

8
MEASUREMENTS USED CONT
  • SATISFACTION QUESTIONNAIRE
  • Designed by the programme facilitators in order
    to measure satisfaction with the content of the
    programme and to elicit most helpful components

9
(No Transcript)
10
(No Transcript)
11
(No Transcript)
12
(No Transcript)
13
SUMMARY RESULTS FROM MEASUREMENTS
  • General Health Questionnaire (GHQ-12)
  • Time 1 6 participants scored in the severe
    distress range with an equal distribution across
    gender.
  • Time 1 4 participants scored in the borderline
    distress range comprising 1 male and 3 females.
  • Time 1 8 participants scored in the typical
    range with equal distribution across gender.

14
General Health Questionnaire (cont)
  • Severe Distress Range
  • There was an overall mean score of 22.83 (at
    Time 1) to a mean score of 15.66 (at Time 2) with
    2 participants decreasing their score from 26
    each to 15 and 13 at Time 2 (decrease of 11 and
    13 points respectively). The remaining scores in
    this range went from
  • 16 12, 24 21, 22 17, and 23 16.

15
General Health Questionnaire (cont)
  • Evidence of Distress Range
  • 4 participants scored in the evidence of
    distress range with a mean score of 13.5 at Time
    1 and a mean score of 12 at Time 2 bringing the
    participants into the typical range for stress
    levels.
  • 8 participants in the typical range with a
    mean score of 9.8 at Time 1 and a mean score of
    9.25 at Time 2.

16
KNOWLEDGE ON SCHIZOPHRENIA QUESTIONNAIRE
  • 2 of the 18 participants scored high on the KSCHQ
    (31/39 and 28/39) at Time 1 and their scores
    remained static at Time 2.
  • 16 participants experienced an increase in their
    knowledge at Time 2 with the majority showing
    substantial improvements in their overall
    knowledge.
  • Significant increases for 10 participants
  • Moderate increases for 6 participants
  • The mean score at Time 1 was 21.11 and was 27.5
    at Time 2

17
SUMMARY RESPONSES FROM QUESTIONS ON THE PROGRAMME
  • The overall helpfulness of the programme was
    rated highly
  • The families rated the content and knowledge
    gained highly
  • The families valued having their questions
    answered and small group work highly
  • The families rated meeting other
    families/sharing experiences highly
  • The families valued facilitator attitude highly

18
SUMMARY RESPONSES FROM QUESTIONS ON THE PROGRAMME
(cont)
  • Participants views on the programmes overall
    impact on their
  • Knowledge and future capacity to cope with the
    illness, and
  • Manage their stress and access services, was
  • 12 rated the impact as moderately helpful
  • 5 rated the impact in these areas highly
  • 1 participant rated the impact as low

19
SUMMARY RESPONSES FROM QUESTIONS ON THE PROGRAMME
(cont)
  • Participants rated the programmes overall
    impact on their
  • Understanding of their relative and their
    relatives behaviour, and
  • Their views of the mental health service
  • Between moderate and high with 3 participants
    rating the impact as low

20
RELATIONSHIP TO EARLIER RESEARCH FINDINGS
  • Effective in reduction of stress levels
  • Effective in generalising knowledge and skills
    gain
  • Effective in reducing negative communication and
    emotional responses
  • Education interventions only are limited
    Programmes should include therapeutic
    components to develop coping, stress
    management, and problem-solving skills

21
RELATIONSHIP TO EARLIER RESEARCH FINDINGS
  • Effective for encouraging/developing self-support
    groups
  • Contrasts
  • In contrast to previous research retention rates
    were high
  • In contrast to previous research there was gender
    balance of participation with both males/females
    recording poor rates of stress
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com