Title: FAMILY PSYCHOEDUCATION PROGRAMME: SOUTH LEE MENTAL HEALTH SERVICES
1FAMILY PSYCHO-EDUCATION PROGRAMME SOUTH LEE
MENTAL HEALTH SERVICES
- MARIAN BRADY BSW MA CBT.
- SOCIAL WORKER ADULT MENTAL HEALTH
2INTRODUCTION PART B EVIDENCE, RESEARCH FINDINGS
RECOMMENDATIONS
- This part of the presentation will look at
- 1. The evidence-base for family psycho-education
programmes - 2. Findings from the evaluation of our 2008
programme - 3. Recommendations from the research
3PREVIOUS RESEARCH EVIDENCE FOR THE EFFICACY OF
FAMILY PSYCHOEDUCATION
- The present available research studies (most
recent meta-analysis by Lincoln et al., 2007)
consistently demonstrate that when treatment is
integrated with antipsychotic medication AND
family psycho-education, there is - a significant reduction in short-term rate of
relapse, - an increase in the therapeutic link with the
service and - a reduction in caregiver burden
4WHAT DOES THE RESEARCH TELL US?
- Psycho-education solely to individuals with
schizophrenia ineffective - Size of effect on relapse and re-hospitalisation
comparable to medication / CBT - Effective in reducing negative communication
- Effective in generalising knowledge-gain
- Effective for symptom monitoring
- Effective for relapse while symptoms stable
5IMPLICATIONS FOR MENTAL HEALTH SERVICES
- The additional effort of integrating relatives
into treatment is definitely worthwhile. This
suggests that mental health services should be
much more prepared to actively include families
in the treatment and management of their
relatives with schizophrenia.
6SOUTH LEE FAMILY PSYCHO-EDUCATION RESEARCH
PROGRAMME 2008
- Research Design
- The research study was a fixed pre-post-test
design. It measured the effects of the programme
before-after on - participant distress, and
- participant knowledge on schizophrenia
- A satisfaction questionnaire was also
administered after the programme in order to
identify which components within the programme
the families found most helpful.
7THE MEASUREMENTS
- GENERAL HEALTH QUESTIONNAIRE (GHQ-12)
- Screening instrument for distress detection. It
is a validated screening instrument used
throughout the world. It measures psychological
distress and social difficulties. - KNOWLEDGE ON SCHIZOPHRENIA FAMILY QUESTIONNAIRE
- Measures knowledge on the understanding of
schizophrenia across six domains (aetiology,
symptoms, demography, treatment, hospital
procedures, and coping). -
8MEASUREMENTS USED CONT
- SATISFACTION QUESTIONNAIRE
- Designed by the programme facilitators in order
to measure satisfaction with the content of the
programme and to elicit most helpful components
9(No Transcript)
10(No Transcript)
11(No Transcript)
12(No Transcript)
13SUMMARY RESULTS FROM MEASUREMENTS
- General Health Questionnaire (GHQ-12)
- Time 1 6 participants scored in the severe
distress range with an equal distribution across
gender. - Time 1 4 participants scored in the borderline
distress range comprising 1 male and 3 females. - Time 1 8 participants scored in the typical
range with equal distribution across gender.
14General Health Questionnaire (cont)
- Severe Distress Range
- There was an overall mean score of 22.83 (at
Time 1) to a mean score of 15.66 (at Time 2) with
2 participants decreasing their score from 26
each to 15 and 13 at Time 2 (decrease of 11 and
13 points respectively). The remaining scores in
this range went from - 16 12, 24 21, 22 17, and 23 16.
15General Health Questionnaire (cont)
- Evidence of Distress Range
- 4 participants scored in the evidence of
distress range with a mean score of 13.5 at Time
1 and a mean score of 12 at Time 2 bringing the
participants into the typical range for stress
levels. - 8 participants in the typical range with a
mean score of 9.8 at Time 1 and a mean score of
9.25 at Time 2.
16KNOWLEDGE ON SCHIZOPHRENIA QUESTIONNAIRE
- 2 of the 18 participants scored high on the KSCHQ
(31/39 and 28/39) at Time 1 and their scores
remained static at Time 2. - 16 participants experienced an increase in their
knowledge at Time 2 with the majority showing
substantial improvements in their overall
knowledge. - Significant increases for 10 participants
- Moderate increases for 6 participants
- The mean score at Time 1 was 21.11 and was 27.5
at Time 2 -
17SUMMARY RESPONSES FROM QUESTIONS ON THE PROGRAMME
- The overall helpfulness of the programme was
rated highly - The families rated the content and knowledge
gained highly - The families valued having their questions
answered and small group work highly - The families rated meeting other
families/sharing experiences highly - The families valued facilitator attitude highly
18SUMMARY RESPONSES FROM QUESTIONS ON THE PROGRAMME
(cont)
- Participants views on the programmes overall
impact on their - Knowledge and future capacity to cope with the
illness, and - Manage their stress and access services, was
- 12 rated the impact as moderately helpful
- 5 rated the impact in these areas highly
- 1 participant rated the impact as low
19SUMMARY RESPONSES FROM QUESTIONS ON THE PROGRAMME
(cont)
- Participants rated the programmes overall
impact on their - Understanding of their relative and their
relatives behaviour, and - Their views of the mental health service
- Between moderate and high with 3 participants
rating the impact as low -
20RELATIONSHIP TO EARLIER RESEARCH FINDINGS
- Effective in reduction of stress levels
- Effective in generalising knowledge and skills
gain - Effective in reducing negative communication and
emotional responses - Education interventions only are limited
Programmes should include therapeutic
components to develop coping, stress
management, and problem-solving skills
21RELATIONSHIP TO EARLIER RESEARCH FINDINGS
- Effective for encouraging/developing self-support
groups - Contrasts
- In contrast to previous research retention rates
were high - In contrast to previous research there was gender
balance of participation with both males/females
recording poor rates of stress