Title: Arterial spin labeling
1Arterial spin labeling
- Edith Liemburg
- Ze Wang et al., 2008
2Introduction to ASL
- PET-like for direct CBF measurement
- Measurement of slow neural changes
- Absolute quantification of blood flow
http//www.umich.edu/fmri/asl.html
3Principle of ASL
1. Â Tag inflowing arterial blood by magnetic
inversion 2. Â Acquire the tag image
3. Repeat experiment without tag 4. Â Acquire the
control image
http//www.umich.edu/fmri/asl.html
4Image subtraction
-
-
-
-
5- Terms
- CASL continious arterial spin labeling
- PASL pulsed arterial spin labeling
http//www.umich.edu/fmri/asl.html
6ASL vs BOLD
- ASL
- Less slow drifts
- Changes localized in cappilaries
- Reduced inter-subject variability
- Better functional localization
- BOLD
- Short TR
- Many thin slices
- Higher intrinsic SNR
http//www.umich.edu/fmri/asl.html
7Introduction ASL analysis
- Low intrinsic SNR signal only 1 5 of mean MR
signal intensity - CBF calculation ? intesity difference
- Critical preprocessing steps
- (Bit resolution)
- Motion correction
- Spatial smoothing normalization
- Global spike elimination
- Measure of global signal as covariate
8ASL-toolbox
- Ze Wang et al. http//www.cfn.upenn.edu/perfusion
- Raw image to CBF conversion
- 3 methods of calculation
- Simple subtraction
- Zinc subtraction
- Surround subtraction
- Also unscaled (perf) and pseudo-BOLD images
9Material and Methods
- Visual stimuli and finger tapping task in
blockdesign (n 10) - CASL 64 x 64 x 12 voxels (slice 6 mm), TR 3,
labelling 1.6 s, delay 800 ms - Pseudo-CASL sequence
- CBF calibration
f CBF, ?M control label signal, R1a
longitudinal relaxation rate of blood (R1a0.67
s-1), t labeling time (1.6 s), ? delay time
(0.8 s), a labeling efficiency (0.68), ?
blood/tissue water partition coefficient (0.9
g/mL) M0 control image intensity
10Motion correction
- Signal intensity difference ? motion
- Seperate realignment vs combined PCASL or
background suppression
11Smoothing normalization
- Smoothing before CBF calcutation ? increased SNR
outlier reduction - Normalization after CBF calculation first level
? before minor signal changes incorrect - time lag estimation
- (reslicing)
12Spike elimination
- Combined realignment ? average substraction of
motion paramaters of adjecent control label
images - Criteria averaged translation or rotation gt 3
mm/o, subtracted translation or rotation gt 0.8
mm/o, global CBF 3 standard deviations
13Statistical analysis
- Simple subtraction increases peak t-value in
visual cortex - Including the global signal increases peak
t-value cluster size
14Proposed preprocessing steps
- Realignment seperate for control label
- Coregistration labelled to control
- Smoothing
- Exclude extracranial voxels (brain mask)
- CBF calculation simple subtraction
- First level analysis global CBF as covariate (no
explicit masking, no high-pass filter, no HRF) - Masking from mean CBF image
- Global spike elimination according to criteria
- Coregistration mean control to anatomy, con as
other - Normalization anatomy to template
- Second level