Title: DEN HELDER MEETING
1- DEN HELDER MEETING
- MAY 13-14th 2007
- WP10 CO2 BUILDING STOCK BUDGETING
2Presentation
- We have prepared a presentation with 84 slides
for dissemination more details - We will show a summarized presentation
3Complex realistic case
- We can considerate that the refurbishment /
extension of the CHEVROLLIER high school has a
success on life cycle period of 20 years if - GHG emission during 20 years of the old building
(see next slide column 1) - GHG emission during the works period (see next
slide column 2) - will be inferior of the extended refurbishment/
building during 20 years
4CO2 Building Stock Budgeting Application
Reduction of GHG emissions
Building Construction
GHG Total emissions of a building non-refurbished
during 20 years
1
2
Building Refurbishment
5Complex realistic case
- Column 2 is the some of
- GHG emission during the exploitation of
- New buildings
- Retrofit buildings
- GHG emission for preparation and pull down a part
of the existing building - GHG emissions due to materials transportation and
company personal workers vehicles - GHG emissions due to components manufacturing
- GHG emission due refurbishment works en erection
of the new buildings
6Building sector GHG emission a complex case
- The goal of the study is to determinate the pound
of each part - It will be also a try to approach the complexity
of the GHG emission in the building sector - Perhaps, solution advocated in building sector is
not sufficient because previous analysis is too
simple
7GHG emissions during Chevrollier works
- Period
- April 2003
- December 2006
8Transport
- Five sectors
- Personal vehicle
- Company vehicle
- Building site engines
- Transport of materials
- Transport of waste
9Comparison per sectors (for all lots) in2005
10GHG emissions - 2nd semester 2006
11- September 2003
- December 2006
12Total GHG emissions 4030 tonne equivalent CO2
Embodied energy 3438 tonne equivalent CO2
13Total Emission per lot 2003 / December 2006
Lot one divers access network Lot two
electricity Lot three heating / ventilation /
plumbing Lot four all other works.
14GHG emission by sector
86 of the GHG emission is due to fabrication
components
15GHG emission per material type
Cement and Steel ? 76,2 of the total emission
(mainly in new buildings !) Insulating ? 13.1
Aluminium ? 0.8 this result seems very low !
16- Now, we can transmit the numerical results of
materials emissions to help the WP-9 works package
17 18GHG emissions
19Prediction of GHG emissions
20Analysis (1)
- We note a reduction of GHG emission during the
second 2006 semester. For explanation - Firms complete with less precision the files
- Mainly retrofit works on building L (insulation /
no use of a big quantity of cement or steel
during this period) - Cement and steel are the two main responsible
materials of GHG emission
21Analysis (2)
- A perfect collect of data will consist to
separate GHG emission due to - Building pull down
- Retrofit works
- New buildings
22GHG emission conclusion
- The analysis of all data collected shows than
total emission GHG, during the building retrofit
and extension, will be superior than - 5 000 tonne equivalent CO2, probably 5 500
tonne equivalent CO2 - 62 of this emission is due to the use of cement
and steel !!!
23Comparison between GHG emissions
- GHG emission during the building retrofit and
extension - GHG emission during one year by the CHEVROLLIER
high school before retrofit
24Chevrollier high school
Energy consumption and GHG emission before
retrofit and extension (average)
- Please note we have taken the EU ratio as
discuss during the FIRENZE meeting
25Comparison between GHG emissions for each period
tonne eq.CO2
956 average GHG annual emissions (heating /
lighting / hot sanitary water / ) before
refurbishment and extension
5438 Total GHG emissions predicted (from 2003 to
the end of the works)
3850 Total GHG emissions from 2003 to 1st
semester 2006
Refurbished building and extension
26Analyse (1)
- The total GHG emission due to the retrofit and
the extension of the Chevrollier high school is
equivalent to the GHG emission, before retrofit
and extension, during 5 years!
27Analyse (2)
- The previous result is a surprising result for
people who has known the building before retrofit
(a building with a high level of consumption) - The consequence of this analysis must be analyzed
carefully - We will develop this work during the next year
28Analyse (3)
- We hope that this non-typical approach can help
deciders to choose the most efficient way for
global reduction emission of GHG in the building
sector
29- THANKS FOR YOUR ATTENTION