Title: Kosovo and Metohija Status Negotiation
1Kosovo and Metohija Status Negotiation
- Statement by Dušan Prorokovic,
- State Secretary
2(No Transcript)
3(No Transcript)
4(No Transcript)
5- Resolution 1244
- Adopted by the Security Council at its 4011th
meeting, on 10 June 1999
6Article 10
- Authorizes the Secretary-General, with the
assistance of relevant international
organizations, to establish an international
civil presence in Kosovo in order to provide an
interim administration for Kosovo under which the
people of Kosovo can enjoy substantial autonomy
within the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia, and
which will provide transitional administration
while establishing and overseeing the development
of provisional democratic self-governing
institutions to ensure conditions for a peaceful
and normal life for all inhabitants of Kosovo
7(No Transcript)
8(No Transcript)
9 10(No Transcript)
11(No Transcript)
12(No Transcript)
13Serbs in Kosovo and Metohia1999 2004
14(No Transcript)
15(No Transcript)
16- All Serbian proposals for substantial autonomy
were refused by Albanian side, since 2005
17Serbian proposal
- To ensure a true autonomy of Kosovo and Metohija
within Serbia, with a partial right of Kosovo and
Metohija to international representation.
18Serbian proposal
- The reserved jurisdiction of Serbia would
include - 1. Foreign affairs
- 2. Border control
- 3. Protection of Serbian religious and cultural
heritage - 4. Defense defense would be a reserved
jurisdiction of Serbia not applied on the
territory of Kosovo and Metohija. Kosovo and
Metohija would be a demilitarized territory where
international military forces would engage in
security provision activities under UN control.
19Serbian proposal
- The cooperation policy between central
authorities in Belgrade and provincial
institutions in Pristina would have to exist in
the following areas -
- 1. Monetary policy
- 2. Customs policy
20Serbian proposal
- The exclusive scope of competences of provincial
institutions of Kosovo and Metohija would
include - 1. Budget and economic policy
- 2. Agriculture
- 3. Media
- 4. Education
- 5. Environmental protection
- 6. Youth and sport
- 7. Fiscal policy and tax collection
- 8. Internal affairs
- 9. Health
- 10. Energy sector
- 11. Infrastructure
- 12. Employment
21Serbian proposal
- Kosovo and Metohija Parliament would have a
legislative authority in all areas of exclusive
scope of competences of Kosovo and Metohija. - The Kosovo and Metohija Government would
independently enforce laws passed by the Kosovo
and Metohija Parliament, without any interference
on behalf of Belgrade. - Kosovo and Metohija would have an independent,
fully integral judiciary system in charge of
cases in exclusive scope of competences of Kosovo
and Metohija and in other cases as defined by the
agreement. During the transition period and due
to the deplorable situation Kosovo and Metohija
judiciary is in, an EU monitoring mechanism would
be put in place, together with international
judges.
22Serbian proposal
- Serbia is an internationally recognized entity
- -Kosovo and Metohija is entitled to have
negotiations with other countries and
international organizations in those areas
pertaining to exclusive scope of competences of
Kosovo and Metohija. Serbia only formally signs
agreements signed by Kosovo and Metohija. - - In those areas pertaining to reserved
jurisdiction of Serbia, the Kosovo and Metohija
representatives would be involved in negotiations
and agreement preparations to be signed by
Serbia. - -Kosovo and Metohija would be entitled to
establish trading and industry representative
offices in other countries. - -Kosovo and Metohija could be a member of
regional initiatives and international
organizations which provide such options for
non-sovereign members, primarily international
financial institutions - -Serbia would offer diplomatic and consular
protection to all citizens, while the Office for
Consular Affairs of Kosovo and Metohija would be
established within Serbias diplomatic and
consular offices. - -Foreign countries would be allowed to establish
their diplomatic and consular offices in Priština
all the way to the level of the Consulate
General.
23Comparative Overview of the Cases of Hong Kong,
Åland Islands, and the Serbian Status Proposal
for Kosovo and Metohija
24Hong Kong Åland Islands Kosovo and Metohija
Basic features of the Cases In 1997 returned to Chinas sovereignty after 155 years of British colonial rule Ethnic majority Chinese (95) HK Basic Law stemming out from the 1984 Sino-British Joint Declaration After Russo-Swedish War (1808-1809) Russia gains Finland and ÅI Ethnic majority Swedish (95) In 1917 Finland independent After 1917, 96,2 of adult population signed the petition for unification with Sweden In 1921 the League of Nations decides that ÅI remains within the sovereignty of Finland, with a high degree of autonomy Current constitutional-legal framework Act on the Autonomy of Åland in accordance with Article 120 of the Constitution of Finland Since June 1999 (8 years) under UN administration Ethnic majority Albanian (81) Current constitutional-legal framework UN SC Res 1244, Constitution of Serbia, and Constitutional Framework for Provisional Self-Government in Kosovo Proposal internationally guaranteed status agreement on KM, new UN SC Res, Constitution of Serbia, and Constitution of KM 20-years timeframe
25Constitutional-Legal Definition of Territory Upholding national unity and territorial integrity and taking account of the history of HK and its realities, the PRC has decided to establish, in accordance with the provisions of Article 31 of the Constitution of the PRC, a HK Special Administrative Region upon resuming the exercise of sovereignty over HK. (Sino-British Joint Declaration, Article 3.1) The HK Special Administrative Region will be directly under the authority of the Central Peoples Government of the PRC. The HK Special Administrative Region will enjoy a high degree of autonomy, except in foreign and defence affairs which are the responsibilities of the Central Peoples Government. (Sino-British Joint Declaration, Article 3.2) The sovereignty of the ÅI is recognised to belong to Finland. (Decision of the Council of the League of Nations on the ÅI, Article 1) The territory of Finland is indivisible. The national borders can not be altered without the consent of the Parliament. (Constitution of Finland, Section 4) Åland comprises the territory it has at the time of the entry into force of this Act and the territorial waters directly adjacent to its land territory according to the enactments in force on the limits of the territorial waters of Finland. If the jurisdiction and sovereignty of the State are extended beyond the limits of the territorial waters the jurisdiction and sovereignty of Åland may be likewise extended, as agreed by the State and Åland. (Act on the Autonomy of Åland, Section 2) the Province of Kosovo and Metohija is an integral part of the territory of Serbia, that it has the status of a substantial autonomy within the sovereign state of Serbia and that from such status of the Province of Kosovo and Metohija follow constitutional obligations of all state bodies to uphold and protect the state interests of Serbia in Kosovo and Metohija in all internal and foreign political relations (Constitution of Serbia, Preamble) In the Republic of Serbia, there are the Autonomous Province of Vojvodina and the Autonomous Province of Kosovo and Metohija. The substantial autonomy of the Autonomous province of Kosovo and Metohija shall be regulated by the special law which shall be adopted in accordance with the proceedings envisaged for amending the Constitution. (Constitution of Serbia, Article 182.2)
26(No Transcript)