PingER Project - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 29
About This Presentation
Title:

PingER Project

Description:

... to monitor to border routers &/or to end hosts at sites (e.g. site web servers) ... Flexibility in extracting net performance data, needed since ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:31
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 30
Provided by: new7160
Category:
Tags: pinger | asp | hosting | net | project | web

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: PingER Project


1
PingER Project
  • Arguably the worlds most extensive active
    end-to-end Internet Performance Project
  • Digital Divide emphasis
  • Partially funded by MoST, US State Department
  • Last three years a joint development effort of
    SLAC NIIT
  • Many NIIT students cut their teeth on it, many
    papers, presentations
  • Results
  • Highly successful
  • Identified quantified rates of improvement for
    regions/countries
  • How far behind, catching up, falling behind
  • Many presentations to funding agencies,
    politicians, NRENs, recommendations
  • Case studies identified fragility of e2e
    connections, last mile congestion problems,
    inefficient routing

2
PingER Methodology
gtping remhost
Uses ubiquitous ping
Remote Host (typically a server)
Internet
Monitoring host
10 ping request packets each 30 mins
Once a Day
Ping response packets
Data Repository _at_ SLAC
Measure Round Trip Time Loss
3
Architecture
  • Monitor hosts send 21 pings each 30 mins to
    Remote Hosts and cache results
  • Archive hosts gather data daily, save, analyze
    make results available publicly via web

4
PingER Deployment
  • PingER project originally (1995) to measure
    network performance for US, Europe and Japanese
    HEP community
  • Extended this century to measure Digital Divide
  • Collaboration with ICTP Science Dissemination
    Unit http//sdu.ictp.it
  • ICFA/SCIC http//icfa-scic.web.cern.ch/ICFA-SCIC/
  • gt120 countries (99 worlds connected population)
  • gt30 monitor sites in 14 countries
  • Monitor 44 sites in S. Asia

5
Time Series results
  • Divides into 2
  • India, Maldives, Pakistan, Sri Lanka
  • Bangladesh, Nepal, Bhutan, Afghanistan
  • Weekend vs. weekday indicates heavy congestion

6
Unreachability
  • All pings of a set fail unreachable
  • Shows fragility, distance independent
  • Developed regions US, Canada, Europe, Oceania, E
    Asia lead
  • Factor of 10 improvement in 8 years
  • Africa, S. Asia followed by M East L. America
    worst off
  • Africa NOT improving

SE Asia
L America
M East
C Asia
Oceania
S Asia
SE Europe
Russia
Developing Regions
Africa
E Asia
Developed Regions
US Canada
Europe
7
World thruput seen from US
Throughput 1460Bytes / (RTTsqrt(loss)) (Mathis
et al)
Behind Europe 6 Yrs Russia, Latin America
7 Yrs Mid-East, SE Asia 10 Yrs South
Asia 11 Yrs Cent. Asia 12 Yrs Africa
South Asia, Central Asia, and Africa are in
Danger of Falling Even Farther Behind
8
Conclusions
  • Last mile problems, network fragility, poor
    routing
  • Decreasing use of satellites, expensive, but
    still needed for many remote countries in Africa
    and C. Asia
  • Africa 10 years behind and falling further
    behind, leads to information famine
  • Africa big target of opportunity
  • Growth in users 2000-2005 200, Africa 625
  • Need more competitive pricing
  • Fibre competition, government divest for access,
    low cost VSAT licenses
  • Consortiums to aggregate get better pricing
    (/BW reduces with BW)
  • Need better routing - IXPs
  • Need training skills for optimal bandwidth
    management
  • Internet performance correlates strongly with
    UNDP ITU development indices
  • Increase coverage of monitoring to understand
    Internet performance

9
Application to PERN
  • Place PingER monitoring node(s) inside PERN
  • V. modest host, trivial install
  • Add traceroute/landmark server for geolocation
  • PERN configures to monitor to border routers /or
    to end hosts at sites (e.g. site web servers)
  • Currently gathers data daily, analyze, present
    via SLAC/FNAL
  • NIIT/SLAC plans to develop front end to
    analyze/visualize results on real time basis
    using cached data RRD/smokeping

10
perfSONAR Next Generation Network Monitoring
  • Partnership of Internet2 (US), GEANT (EU), ESnet
    (US), RNP (Brazil)
  • Plus in the US SLAC, U Delaware, GATech
  • 13 EU related NREN deployments of perfSONAR

11
Why is this hard?
  • Internet very diverse, hard to find invariants,
    phone models do not work
  • Constantly changing both short and long-term
  • Changes are not smooth but usually in steps,
    findings may be out of date
  • No central organization
  • Scientific communities span multiple
    organizations in many countries
  • Typical path requires crossing at least 5
    administrative domains (campus, regional,
    backbone, regional and campus)
  • Domains are autonomous
  • Measurement not high on vendors priorities
  • ISPs concerned about privacy, competitive
    advantage, public embarrassment
  • Diagnosis hard
  • Convince ADs there is a problem and that they
    could/should help
  • Need multiple pieces of information from multiple
    sources (ends, multiple middles), with no
    coordinating body
  • Gets even harder for layer 2 networks

12
New Proposal to Address
  • Widespread demand for net info by
  • Researchers to know how network is performing
  • Advanced net apps such as Grids (e.g. place data)
  • Net Ops staffs to diagnose problems
  • Education
  • Flexibility in extracting net performance data,
    needed since
  • Network changes quickly, diagnostic data is
    moving target
  • New tools, metrics and types of analysis are
    constantly developed
  • Lack of effective ways to share performance data
    across domains

13
perfSONAR Infrastructure
  • Provide/Enable Measurement Points and Archives
  • Provide Authentication/Authorization
  • Provide registration, discovery distributed
    lookup services
  • Provide open set of protocols reference
    implementation for cross-domain sharing of
    network measurements
  • Common performance middleware
  • Open Grid Forum NMWG extensible XML data
    representation
  • All development is open source to encourage
    widespread development, deployment, ownership
    involvement
  • Early framework prototypes deployed in Europe, N
    and S America (Brazil), also adopted by LHC

14
Next Steps
  • Develop scalable, distributed, redundant
    Federated Lookup Service (like DNS)
  • Integrate common, existing authentication
    management into perfSONAR
  • Design and build the Resource Protector to
    implement policy
  • Provide specific, useful example diagnostic
    services as high quality examples (e.g. for
    traceroute, ping, one-way delay, SNMP, Layer-2
    link services etc.)
  • Provide a Topology service to provide layer-2 3
    interconnection information
  • Promote perfSONAR to research community
  • Students get reliable data from perfSONAR,
    request on demand measurements, provide new
    analyses
  • Turn into hardened/production quality
    distributable code

15
Impact NRENs Customers
  • RE relies on reliable networking.
  • Debugging problems across domains extraordinarily
    difficult today, increased switched networks will
    make harder.
  • PerfSONAR enables divide and conquer between end
    intermediate points
  • provides easy access to relevant data enables on
    demand measurements
  • reduces need to coordinate multi-domain admins
    (scientist gt local net admin gt Regional net admin
    Backbone admin gt ), telephone tag, explaining
  • Reduces participants, hours, days, frustration
    etc

16
Benefits Pakistan
  • Better understanding of customer experience and
    needs
  • utilization, use patterns, event detection,
    problem diagnosis, planning
  • Development of better measurement tools,
    analysis, visualization
  • Pakistan part of major international community of
    NRENs, a partnership of users and providers
  • In Europe, U.S. and S. America
  • Worldwide RE people demanding better services
  • Pakistan research education access to data to
    analyze

17
Benefits Education
  • NIIT/SLAC proven track record delivering results
  • 6 students, all will return to Pakistan
  • 3 at SLAC now
  • 1 In Silicon valley start-up, 1 in Oxford, 1
    returned to NIIT to pursue PhD
  • Students get exposure to National Lab and world
    leading researchers
  • Courses at Stanford
  • Hands on exposure to production high speed
    networks such as are planned for Pakistan

18
One Big Challenge
  • Elegant graphics are great to understand problems
    BUT
  • Can be thousands of graphs to look at (many site
    pairs, many devices, many metrics)
  • Need automated problem recognition AND diagnosis
  • So developing tools to reliably detect
    significant, persistent changes in performance
  • Initially using simple plateau algorithm to
    detect step changes
  • Provide reliable alerts
  • Automatically partially diagnose events
  • Gather info from routers, monitors etc and
    eliminate less likely causes

19
What do we want from you
  • Now
  • Installation and administration of PingER
    monitoring host (s) inside PERN
  • Installation admin of traceroute/landmark
    servers in major PERN PoP/cities
  • Chairman HEC asked for proposal to HEC for
    perfSONAR, will embed PERN requirements in
    proposal
  • PERN needs to partner with NIIT/SLAC
  • Discuss Contributions from PERN
  • Later
  • Deployment of Measurement Points within PERN

20
Additional Slides
21
More information/Questions
  • Acknowledgements
  • Harvey Newman and ICFA/SCIC for a raison detre,
    ICTP for contacts and education on Africa, Mike
    Jensen for Africa information, NIIT/Pakistan for
    developing valuable tools, Maxim Grigoriev
    (FNAL), Warren Matthews (GATech) for ongoing code
    development for PingER, USAID MoST/Pakistan for
    development funding, SLAC for support for ongoing
    management/operations support of PingER
  • PingER
  • www-iepm.slac.stanford.edu/pinger,
    sdu.ictp.it/pinger/africa.html
  • Human Development
  • http//www.gapminder.org/
  • Case Studies
  • https//confluence.slac.stanford.edu/display/IEPM/
    Sub-SaharaCaseStudy
  • http//sdu.ictp.it/lowbandwidth/program/case-studi
    es/index.html

22
Costs compared to West
  • Sites in many countries have bandwidthlt US
    residence
  • 10 Meg is Here, www.lightreading.com/document.as
    p?doc_id104415
  • Africa 5460/Mbps/m
  • W Africa 8K/Mbps/m
  • N Africa 520/Mbps/m
  • Often cross-country cost dominates cf.
    international

1 yr of Internet access gt average annual income
of most Africans, Survey by Paul Budde
Communnications
23
UNDP Human Development Index (HDI)
  • A long and healthy life, as measured by life
    expectancy at birth
  • Knowledge, as measured by the adult literacy rate
    (with two-thirds weight) and the combined
    primary, secondary and tertiary gross enrolment
    ratio (with one-third weight)
  • A decent standard of living, as measured by GDP
    per capita.

Africa
PingER - Strong Correlation - Non subjective -
Quicker / easier to update
24
Med. Africa vs HDI
  • N. Africa has 10 times poorer performance than
    Europe
  • Croatia has 13 times better performance than
    Albania
  • Israel has 8 times better performance than rest
    of M East Med. Countries
  • E. Africa poor, limited by satellite access
  • W. Africa big differences, some (Senegal) can
    afford SAT3 fibre others use satellite
  • Great diversity between within regions

25
Digital Access Index (DAI) Infrastructure
availability, Affordability of access, Education,
Quality of ICT, Internet usage
Europe, E Asia (except China), Oceania top
right Israel Singapore with top group Middle
East in middle, Iran poorest Africa bottom
left S. Asia split Bhutan, Nepal, Bangladesh
with Africa India, Pak, Sri Lanka better
Strong positive linear correlation,
C Asia
26
DAI S. Asia
27
Why does it matter Business
  • G8 specifically pledged support for African
    higher education and research by Helping develop
    skilled professionals for Africa's private and
    public sectors, through supporting networks of
    excellence between African's and other countries'
    institutions of higher education and centres of
    excellence in science and technology
    institutions G8 specifically pledged support for
    African higher education and research by Helping
    develop skilled professionals for Africa's
    private and public sectors, through supporting
    networks of excellence between African's and
    other countries' institutions of higher education
    and centres of excellence in science and
    technology institutions

Prahalad and Hart
  • Saturating western markets
  • High growth IT markets BRIC
  • NOT business as usual
  • New business models
  • Distinct needs
  • Dearth of distribution channels

Karen Coppock RDVP, Stanford
28
Experimental Alerting
  • Have false positives down to reasonable level
    (few per week), so sending alerts to developers
  • Saved in database
  • Links to traceroutes, event analysis, time-series

29
Normalized for Details
  • Note step changes
  • Africa v. poor
  • S. Asia improving
  • N. America, Europe, E Asia, Oceania lead
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com