Comments on Speed-up of HAPL Approach to Fusion - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 8
About This Presentation
Title:

Comments on Speed-up of HAPL Approach to Fusion

Description:

Abdou et al, gives a well reasoned set of arguments about what is needed for ... Heresy, but what ever can be done fastest is needed to speed-up nuclear testing. ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:11
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 9
Provided by: hpcus685
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Comments on Speed-up of HAPL Approach to Fusion


1
Comments on Speed-up of HAPL Approach to Fusion
  • John Sheffield
  • JIEE
  • November 2005

2
High Volume Plasma Based Neutron Source
  • The IEA study, UCLA-ENG-95-111,
  • Abdou et al, gives a well reasoned set of
    arguments about what is needed for nuclear
    testing and development of reliable blankets to
    meet the availability of an MFE DEMO reactor.
  • Without a Volume Neutron Source in MFE, it is
    essentially impossible to do adequate testing -
    even with the original extended- performance ITER
    and IFMIF!

3
IFE Needs for Nuclear Testing
  • Interestingly, the IFE requirements are less
    stringent than for an MFE DEMO.
  • Either there will be a flowing lithium blanket
    or, in the case of a dry wall, the wall will be
    operated at lower neutron flux to handle the
    blast.
  • Nevertheless, volume testing of nuclear
    components may well set the critical path to
    realization of an IFE DEMO. An VNS is essential

4
Neutron Fluence Required for HAPL Power Plant
  • Assume HAPL DEMO fusion power is 1750 MW, 50
    availability and 70 of it hits the walls as
    neutrons i.e., 1225 MWn.
  • Wall at 10.5m, av. neutron flux 0.88 MW/ m2.
  • The average neutron fluence 0.44 MW.yr/ m2.
  • If the Demo runs for 10 to 20 years, required
    chamber material lifetime negligible swelling
    requires testing to gt 4.4 MW.yr/ m2.
  • Surface may need regular damage repair.

5
VNS Neutron Flux and Fluence
  • Initial operation 25 MW, with 17.5 MWn.
  • 1 year commissioning, 2 years at 20 capacity
    factor, and 3 years at 40 capacity factor.
  • Ultimately operation at 150 MW.
  • Assuming 2 years to rebuild after shutting down
    the first version - Remember it is now a highly
    activated facility!
  • 1 years commissioning, 1 year at 25 capacity
    factor and then 50 capacity factor.

6
VNS Integrated Neutron Fluence
Year8 MW.yr/ m2 At 1 meter MW.yr/ m2 At 2 meters
2014 0.28 0.07
2015 0.56 0.14
2016 1.12 0.28
2017 1.68 0.42
2018 2.24 0.56
2019 Upgrade to 150 MW Upgrade to 150 MW
2020 Upgrade to 150 MW Upgrade to 150 MW
2021 4.3 1.1
2022 8.5 2.1
2023 12.7 3.2
2024 16.9 4.3
7
Tritium Usage
  • In the initial phase at 25 MW and 40 capacity
    factor the demand would be
  • 0.56 kg/yr.
  • At 150 MW and 50 capacity factor.
  • Tritium usage 4.2 kg/yr.
  • Substantial tritium breeding will be needed.

8
What VNS
  • Heresy, but what ever can be done fastest is
    needed to speed-up nuclear testing.
  • However, each approach to IFE will need its own
    repetitively pulsed D-T facility to develop
    required capabilities for DEMO.
  • Ergo, need more than one Facility.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com