Title: ACADEMIC PERSONNEL POLICY TRAINING
1ACADEMIC PERSONNEL POLICY TRAINING
- UNIT 18
- The contractThe policyThe practices
2What is Unit 18
- Non-Senate Instructional Unit, including the
following titles used at Davis - Lecturers/Senior Lecturers (not with Security of
Employment) - Supervisors of Teacher Education
- Child Development Demonstration Lecturer
(formerly Nursery School Teachers)
3Unique Aspects of Unit 18 Employment
- Courses taught by Lecturers have pre-approved
value (Instructional Workload Credit) - Percentage of appointment set by the value of the
IWC
- Service record maintained on quarter-by-quarter
basis within a department - Any appointment after the equivalent of 6 years
of service (18 quarters for academic year, 24
quarters for fiscal year) will be for a
Continuing Appointment with no end date
4Instructional Workload Credit (IWC)
- Workload is assigned for each particular course
taught by a lecturer approval of IWC value is
made by the Vice Provost - Academic Personnel in
consultation with the Dean - Appointment percentage is based on IWC values
5For Example
- Department of Anthropology
- 9 IWCs per year
- (3 IWCs per quarter)
- 100 appointment
- Each lower division course 1.5 IWC
-
- Lecturer X is appointed to teach 2 lower
division courses in the Fall Quarter - The percentage of the appointment is
- 1.5 x 2 3 IWC 100 appointment for Fall
Quarter
6Eligibility
- Demonstrated experience in teaching
- Usually an advanced degree in relevant field
- May NOT be a student at any UC campus
- May not have been denied tenure at any UC campus
within 5 years of Unit 18 appointment
7Recruitment Requirements
- Same recruitment requirements as for other
academics (refer to UCD 500) - Useful to conduct generic search to gather pool
of candidates for sabbatical replacements,
temporary teaching needs
8Old Contract to New Contract -- Appointment
Changes
- Quarter count by department
- 3-Year Contract replaced by Continuing
Appointment - An individual can hold a Continuing Appointment
in one department, and a pre-six appointment in
another - Salary increase at beginning of 4th service year
for pre-6 appointees - Merit review for Continuing Appointees only
9Accumulating Service Quarters
- Service in a Unit 18 title is counted at the
department level - This service counts toward the 4th year salary
increase and toward a Continuing Appointment - All service in the title in that department is
counted, whether or not there is a break in
service - Without-salary appointments are not covered by
the contract
10Importance of Planning
- Planning begins with annual department
determination of instructional delivery for all
undergraduate courses - If annual determination of instructional delivery
reveals need for NSF, then NSF performance is
assessed for possible reappointment - Annual assessment that reflects a need for NSF
appointee puts department on the road to
Continuing Appointment - Contract requires planning lack of planning
could result in grievances and potential legal
exposure
11More on Planning
- Department Chair should communicate with Senate
faculty about their role in assessing department
need, instructional delivery, and evaluating
performance - At what year should Senate faculty vote
- The role of a departmental ad hoc committee
need for NSF - Level of commitment when Continuing Appointment
is considered impact on hiring of new Senate
faculty
12Pre-6 Appointments/Reappointments
- Guidelines for NSF appointees in their first six
years within one department
13Appointment Process for Unit 18
- Follows standard appointment process of academic
appointees (establish a need, search for best
candidate, review in department, submit proposed
appointment for review/approval by the dean)
14Employment Requirements
- Academic Year NSFs who teach in all 3 quarters
must have appointment dates, for payroll and
benefit purposes, from July 1 through June 30 - Averaging an appointment This is only possible
when the appointee has assigned teaching, in one
department, for all quarters of the academic
year must be a strong programmatic rationale - You may not average appointments in different
departments
15Seven Years in the Life of Lecturer X
- Taking a walk through history
16Pre-Six Reappointments
- Teaching Assessment precedes any reappointment
- NSF under consideration for reappointment is
notified of review criteria, departmental
process, deadline dates
17Pre-6 Reappointments Assessing Need and
Performance
- 1. Determination by the department that an
instructional need exists that is not met by
Senate faculty, Graduate Student (ASE),
distinguished Visiting or Adjunct Professor does
not exist when faculty determines that the
academic programmatic needs require rotation to
satisfy intellectual diversity - 2. If instructional need exists, conduct
assessment of NSF performance to determine if
there is demonstrated competence in the field and
demonstrated ability in teaching and other
assigned duties as evidenced by command of
subject matter and continued growth in mastering
new topics - Ability to organize and present course materials
- Ability to awaken in students an awareness of the
importance of the subject matter - Ability to arouse curiosity in beginning students
and to stimulate advanced students to do creative
work
18Who Conducts the Assessment
- Responsibility of the Academic Senate to ensure
quality of instruction - May be carried out by the Department Chairperson,
or an appropriate standing committee that
includes Senate faculty - Recommended, but not required, to include input
from NSF Continuing Appointee
19Informing Lecturer X
- To be provided to NSF, in writing
- What is the assessment process when does it
happen - What is the criteria that is used
- What materials are needed for the assessment
20Pre-6 Salary Increases
- Automatic 1-step salary increase for any
reappointment for a 4th year within a department - Range adjustments
21The Initial Continuing Appointment
- Reappointments following 6 years of service in a
department in a Unit 18 Title
22Step 1 Needs Assessment
- An aspect of departments academic planning that
takes place during the 5th year of NSFs
appointment - Integrated into normal annual planning of
curriculum, and takes into account the assignment
of instruction to Senate faculty and all other
instructors, including NSF
23What Defines Instructional Need
- Course(s) to be taught in same area as previously
taught by the NSF - Courses in same area of NSFs expertise
- Courses are expected to be taught by that NSF
24Instructional Need -- continued
- Need for Continuing Appointment does not exist
- if
- 1. Course will be taught by Academic Senate
faculty - 2. Course will be taught by Graduate Student
(ASE) - 3. Course will be taught by distinguished
Visiting or Adjunct Professor - 4. Does not exist when faculty determines
that the academic programmatic needs require
rotation to satisfy intellectual diversity - 5. There are no other courses appropriately
taught by NSF
25Step 2 After Instructional Need is Established
- Department conducts excellence review
- of NSF in their sixth year
- Notifies Lecturer X, in advance and in
- writing, of the timing, process, and
- criteria for this important review
26Excellence How can you tell?
- Process for assessing NSF performance may
include some or all of the following - Assessments of current and former students
- Assessments by departmental faculty
- Assessments from classroom visits
- Evaluation of new instructional techniques
developed by NSF - Reasonable efforts to ensure that a qualified NSF
participates on review committee
27Criteria for Assessing Excellence
- Reviewers should look at NSFs
- Command of subject matter and continued growth in
mastering new topics - Ability to organize and present course materials
- Ability to awaken in students an awareness of the
importance of the subject matter - Ability to arouse curiosity in beginning students
and to stimulate advanced students to do creative
work and - Achievements of students in their field
28Merit and Continuing Appointees
- Lecturers being considered for a Continuing
Appointment must also be considered for a merit
increase - If approved, merit increase is 2 steps
- Merit consideration every three years after that
29Ending a Continuing Appointment
- Resignation
- Layoff
- Dismissal based on
- Dereliction of Duty
- Just Cause
- Lack of Excellence
30Reasons for Layoff
- Lack of work
- Budgetary exigencies
- Programmatic changes where classes taught by NSF
are no longer offered, or are being taught by
others, i.e. Academic Senate faculty - Layoff protections for Continuing Appointees
31Discipline and Dismissal
- Requires due process
- When non-Excellent performance drives
consideration for dismissal, Remediation Plan
must be followed to allow sufficient time for
improvement
32Becoming Familiar with the new contract...
- Appointment Articles 7a,b,c
- Benefits Article 11, Appendix C
- Layoff Article 17
- Discipline and Dismissal Article 30
- Grievance and Aribitration Articles 32 and 33.
-