ACADEMIC PERSONNEL POLICY TRAINING - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 32
About This Presentation
Title:

ACADEMIC PERSONNEL POLICY TRAINING

Description:

Non-Senate Instructional Unit, including the following titles used at Davis: ... Dereliction of Duty. Just Cause. Lack of Excellence. Reasons for Layoff. Lack of work ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:29
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 33
Provided by: ktp1
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: ACADEMIC PERSONNEL POLICY TRAINING


1
ACADEMIC PERSONNEL POLICY TRAINING
  • UNIT 18
  • The contractThe policyThe practices

2
What is Unit 18
  • Non-Senate Instructional Unit, including the
    following titles used at Davis
  • Lecturers/Senior Lecturers (not with Security of
    Employment)
  • Supervisors of Teacher Education
  • Child Development Demonstration Lecturer
    (formerly Nursery School Teachers)

3
Unique Aspects of Unit 18 Employment
  • Courses taught by Lecturers have pre-approved
    value (Instructional Workload Credit)
  • Percentage of appointment set by the value of the
    IWC
  • Service record maintained on quarter-by-quarter
    basis within a department
  • Any appointment after the equivalent of 6 years
    of service (18 quarters for academic year, 24
    quarters for fiscal year) will be for a
    Continuing Appointment with no end date

4
Instructional Workload Credit (IWC)
  • Workload is assigned for each particular course
    taught by a lecturer approval of IWC value is
    made by the Vice Provost - Academic Personnel in
    consultation with the Dean
  • Appointment percentage is based on IWC values

5
For Example
  • Department of Anthropology
  • 9 IWCs per year
  • (3 IWCs per quarter)
  • 100 appointment
  • Each lower division course 1.5 IWC
  • Lecturer X is appointed to teach 2 lower
    division courses in the Fall Quarter
  • The percentage of the appointment is
  • 1.5 x 2 3 IWC 100 appointment for Fall
    Quarter

6
Eligibility
  • Demonstrated experience in teaching
  • Usually an advanced degree in relevant field
  • May NOT be a student at any UC campus
  • May not have been denied tenure at any UC campus
    within 5 years of Unit 18 appointment

7
Recruitment Requirements
  • Same recruitment requirements as for other
    academics (refer to UCD 500)
  • Useful to conduct generic search to gather pool
    of candidates for sabbatical replacements,
    temporary teaching needs

8
Old Contract to New Contract -- Appointment
Changes
  • Quarter count by department
  • 3-Year Contract replaced by Continuing
    Appointment
  • An individual can hold a Continuing Appointment
    in one department, and a pre-six appointment in
    another
  • Salary increase at beginning of 4th service year
    for pre-6 appointees
  • Merit review for Continuing Appointees only

9
Accumulating Service Quarters
  • Service in a Unit 18 title is counted at the
    department level
  • This service counts toward the 4th year salary
    increase and toward a Continuing Appointment
  • All service in the title in that department is
    counted, whether or not there is a break in
    service
  • Without-salary appointments are not covered by
    the contract

10
Importance of Planning
  • Planning begins with annual department
    determination of instructional delivery for all
    undergraduate courses
  • If annual determination of instructional delivery
    reveals need for NSF, then NSF performance is
    assessed for possible reappointment
  • Annual assessment that reflects a need for NSF
    appointee puts department on the road to
    Continuing Appointment
  • Contract requires planning lack of planning
    could result in grievances and potential legal
    exposure

11
More on Planning
  • Department Chair should communicate with Senate
    faculty about their role in assessing department
    need, instructional delivery, and evaluating
    performance
  • At what year should Senate faculty vote
  • The role of a departmental ad hoc committee
    need for NSF
  • Level of commitment when Continuing Appointment
    is considered impact on hiring of new Senate
    faculty

12
Pre-6 Appointments/Reappointments
  • Guidelines for NSF appointees in their first six
    years within one department

13
Appointment Process for Unit 18
  • Follows standard appointment process of academic
    appointees (establish a need, search for best
    candidate, review in department, submit proposed
    appointment for review/approval by the dean)

14
Employment Requirements
  • Academic Year NSFs who teach in all 3 quarters
    must have appointment dates, for payroll and
    benefit purposes, from July 1 through June 30
  • Averaging an appointment This is only possible
    when the appointee has assigned teaching, in one
    department, for all quarters of the academic
    year must be a strong programmatic rationale
  • You may not average appointments in different
    departments

15
Seven Years in the Life of Lecturer X
  • Taking a walk through history

16
Pre-Six Reappointments
  • Teaching Assessment precedes any reappointment
  • NSF under consideration for reappointment is
    notified of review criteria, departmental
    process, deadline dates

17
Pre-6 Reappointments Assessing Need and
Performance
  • 1. Determination by the department that an
    instructional need exists that is not met by
    Senate faculty, Graduate Student (ASE),
    distinguished Visiting or Adjunct Professor does
    not exist when faculty determines that the
    academic programmatic needs require rotation to
    satisfy intellectual diversity
  • 2. If instructional need exists, conduct
    assessment of NSF performance to determine if
    there is demonstrated competence in the field and
    demonstrated ability in teaching and other
    assigned duties as evidenced by command of
    subject matter and continued growth in mastering
    new topics
  • Ability to organize and present course materials
  • Ability to awaken in students an awareness of the
    importance of the subject matter
  • Ability to arouse curiosity in beginning students
    and to stimulate advanced students to do creative
    work

18
Who Conducts the Assessment
  • Responsibility of the Academic Senate to ensure
    quality of instruction
  • May be carried out by the Department Chairperson,
    or an appropriate standing committee that
    includes Senate faculty
  • Recommended, but not required, to include input
    from NSF Continuing Appointee

19
Informing Lecturer X
  • To be provided to NSF, in writing
  • What is the assessment process when does it
    happen
  • What is the criteria that is used
  • What materials are needed for the assessment

20
Pre-6 Salary Increases
  • Automatic 1-step salary increase for any
    reappointment for a 4th year within a department
  • Range adjustments

21
The Initial Continuing Appointment
  • Reappointments following 6 years of service in a
    department in a Unit 18 Title

22
Step 1 Needs Assessment
  • An aspect of departments academic planning that
    takes place during the 5th year of NSFs
    appointment
  • Integrated into normal annual planning of
    curriculum, and takes into account the assignment
    of instruction to Senate faculty and all other
    instructors, including NSF

23
What Defines Instructional Need
  • Course(s) to be taught in same area as previously
    taught by the NSF
  • Courses in same area of NSFs expertise
  • Courses are expected to be taught by that NSF

24
Instructional Need -- continued
  • Need for Continuing Appointment does not exist
  • if
  • 1. Course will be taught by Academic Senate
    faculty
  • 2. Course will be taught by Graduate Student
    (ASE)
  • 3. Course will be taught by distinguished
    Visiting or Adjunct Professor
  • 4. Does not exist when faculty determines
    that the academic programmatic needs require
    rotation to satisfy intellectual diversity
  • 5. There are no other courses appropriately
    taught by NSF

25
Step 2 After Instructional Need is Established
  • Department conducts excellence review
  • of NSF in their sixth year
  • Notifies Lecturer X, in advance and in
  • writing, of the timing, process, and
  • criteria for this important review

26
Excellence How can you tell?
  • Process for assessing NSF performance may
    include some or all of the following
  • Assessments of current and former students
  • Assessments by departmental faculty
  • Assessments from classroom visits
  • Evaluation of new instructional techniques
    developed by NSF
  • Reasonable efforts to ensure that a qualified NSF
    participates on review committee

27
Criteria for Assessing Excellence
  • Reviewers should look at NSFs
  • Command of subject matter and continued growth in
    mastering new topics
  • Ability to organize and present course materials
  • Ability to awaken in students an awareness of the
    importance of the subject matter
  • Ability to arouse curiosity in beginning students
    and to stimulate advanced students to do creative
    work and
  • Achievements of students in their field

28
Merit and Continuing Appointees
  • Lecturers being considered for a Continuing
    Appointment must also be considered for a merit
    increase
  • If approved, merit increase is 2 steps
  • Merit consideration every three years after that

29
Ending a Continuing Appointment
  • Resignation
  • Layoff
  • Dismissal based on
  • Dereliction of Duty
  • Just Cause
  • Lack of Excellence

30
Reasons for Layoff
  • Lack of work
  • Budgetary exigencies
  • Programmatic changes where classes taught by NSF
    are no longer offered, or are being taught by
    others, i.e. Academic Senate faculty
  • Layoff protections for Continuing Appointees

31
Discipline and Dismissal
  • Requires due process
  • When non-Excellent performance drives
    consideration for dismissal, Remediation Plan
    must be followed to allow sufficient time for
    improvement

32
Becoming Familiar with the new contract...
  • Appointment Articles 7a,b,c
  • Benefits Article 11, Appendix C
  • Layoff Article 17
  • Discipline and Dismissal Article 30
  • Grievance and Aribitration Articles 32 and 33.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com