Toyako Framework How Civil society can UTILIZE IT

1
Toya-ko FrameworkHow Civil society can UTILIZE
IT?

• Masaki Inaba
• Africa Japan Forum/ GCAP Japan Preparatory
  Committee

2
What is Toya-ko Framework?

• The Biggest Outcome of 2008 Toya-ko Summit
• The G8 Set Toya-ko Framework and its Matrices
  to ensure its accountability for their existing
  pledges and commitments.
• The document of Toya-ko Framework for Action
  set HSS target (2.3/1000 HCWs) and mentioned
  something about SRH
• Global Health will be one of the major agenda on
  development for at least 2010.
• G8 Health Experts Meeting will be responsible to
  make Health Matrices for G8s progress on their
  pledges and G8 Heads will endorse it, by 2010
  Canada G8 Summit.
• Now Civil Society has wider opportunity of
  tracking, reviewing and evaluating G8 Commitments
  by utilizing the Mechanism

3
What Pledges the G8 has done?

• G8 Leaders Declaration and Toya-ko Framework
  cover wider issues such as
• Health Financing (60 billion for 5 years)
• HIV/AIDS (Universal Access by 2010, Fund for GF)
• Malaria (100 million LLINs, and other measures)
• TB (no specific targets, but M/XDR-TB and TB/HIV)
• HSS (2.3/1000 Health Workers)
• MNCH (Up Birth rate with Skilled Birth
  Attendants)
• NTDs and Polio
• Making Pledges Unclear
• First draft of G8 Declaration didnt mention
  2010 and Gleneagles commitment (Financial
  Times)
• 60 Billion 3 diseases HSS (2007 Germany) -gt
  infectious diseases strengthening health
• CS has Wider Opportunities to MAKE THEM KEEP
  PLEDGES

4
Matrices Its a Problem

• G8 Matrices is the only one tools of the
  mechanism to ensure accountability, but it is the
  problem
• No Data of What was done by G8 in total
• No Data of pledges on-track or off-track
• User Unfriendliness
• Different currencies
• Different items
• Incomprehensiveness of the provided data

5
G8 Inner Conflicts for the Matrices Renovation

• G8 Health Experts Meeting in November
• Renovation of Matrices one of the major
  agendas
• Differences of Opinions and Conflicts among G8
• Bloc US/Japan, UK, and EUCanada
• Each Country Contribution for 60 billion pledge
  US/Japan (p) v. EU/Canada (n)
• Quantity-based (US/J)v. Quality-based (EU/C)
• Cooperation with other organization (i.e. OECD)
  EU/C (p) v. US/J (n)
• Technical Difficulties
• Single Currency How to do it, especially in this
  financial crisis
• How to evaluate Contribution by Budget Support
  and SWAps

6
How Civil Society Can Work to Ensure Better
Accountability?

• Shared Strategy for G8 Accountability
• Civil Society Alternative Matrices
• Independent Review of G8 Progress
• Coherent Efforts for Intelligence and Analysis
• Working in Accordance with CS Efforts to get more
  ambitious/needed pledges and commitments
• Getting New Pledges on MNCH/SRH
• Resource Mobilization for UA and the GF (5.6
  Billion USD Deficit for 2008-10 and Next
  Replenishment)

7
Contact

• Africa Japan Forum
• The Secretariat of GCAP Japan Preparatory
  Committee
• Masaki Inaba (Program director for Global Health
  / GCAP Japan Secretariat)
• E-mail masaki.inaba_at_gmail.com,
  office_at_standup2015.jp
• Phone [phone], Fax [phone]
• URL http//www.project-ring.jp/