Title: Oligopoly
1Lecture 18
2Oligopoly
- Introduction
- have discussed three market structures so far
- price taking (perfectly competitive) markets
- open-market price searchers (monopolistic
competition) - closed-market price searchers (monopoly)
3Oligopoly
- for each market structure we assumed that firms
decisions were independent (did not take into
account what others were doing) - price takers
- output decision of any individual firm did not
effect total output so no interest in what others
are doing - monopoly
- since only one firm in market, no competitors to
be concerned about - monopolistic competition
- explicitly assumed that each firm acts
independently
4Oligopoly
- when a price searching market exists and there
are a few firms (but more than one), expect
actions to be interdependent - example of two gas stations in a small town
5Oligopoly
- Definition
- an oligopoly exists when there are relatively few
(but more than one) price searchers in a market
who take into account each others expected
reactions when determining the best price and
output - oligopoly literally means few sellers
6Price and Output
- Equilibrium price and quantity depends on how
firms react to one another - Firms cooperate the case of collusion
- collusion is an agreement among sellers to
restrict competition in some way - a cartel is a group of colluding firms
- examples OPEC, International Bauxite
Association - if all firms band together and act like a single
monopolist, all can benefit - want to restrict output and raise price
7Price and Output
- Firms cooperate the case of collusion
- instability of cartel
- although each firm is better off when they
collude, they can earn even higher profits if
they cheat (ie. compete) and others do not - let other firms bear the burden of keeping price
up by restricting their output - free ride on other firms
8Incentive for Cartel Members to Cheat
- The industry demand (Di) and marginal revenue
(MRi) show that the oligopolists would
maximize joint profit at output Qi, where MRi
MC . . .
price Pi would deliver the largest profit for
the industry as a whole.
- The demand curve facing each firm (df) (under
the assumption that no other firms cheat)
would be much more elastic than industry demand
(Di).
- Given the greater elasticity of its demand
curve, an individual firm would maximize its
profit by expanding output to qf where MRf MC .
. .
and cutting its price to Pf
(from Pi).
- Thus, individual oligopolists could gain by
secretly shaving price and cheating on the
collusive agreement.
Pi
Pf
qf
Qi
9Gains from Cheating on Cartel Price
Industry
Firm
P
P
sum of MC
MC
ATC
Pc
Pc
P2
P1
(before cartel)
d1
DAR
MR
Qc
qc
Q
q1
Q
q2
- The industry demand (D) and marginal revenue
(MR) show that the oligopolists would maximize
joint profit at the monopoly output Qc where
industry MR MC.
- Assuming equal outputs, firm produces qc and
makes an economic profit at the - cartel price. Total output is number of firms,
n, times qc.
- The demand curve facing each firm (d2) (under
the assumption that other firms dont cheat
and charge Pc), would be more elastic than the
original demand (d1).
- Although each firm is better off when they
collude, they can earn even higher profit if
they cheat and equate MC with the MR from their
own demand, mr2.
10Price and Output
- instability of cartel
- since each firm has incentive to cheat, cartels
often fall apart - cheating problem is exacerbated by the fact that
competition can occur on many margins - competition from new firms
- if cartel firms are making economic profits,
incentive for new firms to enter the market - if let new firms into cartel, profit for each
member diminishes - if exclude new entrants, they will cut price and
take business away from cartel
11Price and Output
- to be successful, a cartel must
- get agreement on production levels
- prevent cheating by cartel members
- restrict entry of new competitors
12Price and Output
- factors increasing probability of successful
collusion - few sellers
- easier to reach agreement
- easier to monitor production and prevent cheating
- stable demand
- easier to determine if cheating is occurring by
looking at changes in own sales - similar costs
- if have different costs, more difficult ot reach
agreement on price and output - for a given P and Q, if have different costs get
different levels of profit
13Price and Output
- factors increasing probability of successful
collusion - homogeneous product
- fewer variables to agree on
- limits margins onwhich to compete
- sealed-bid auctions
- bidding to specifications makes product
homogeneous - easy to detect cheaters since all bids are
revealed - no antitrust enforcement
14Price and Output
- factors increasing probability of successful
collusion - government regulations help enforce cartel
- government established cartels
- example government permitted six New England
states to form a milk cartel (Northeast
Interstate Dairy Compact -- NIDC). In 1999
legislation allowed dairy farmers in Northeastern
states surrounding NIDC to join NIDC, 7 in 16
Southern states to form a new regional cartel.
Soy milk became more popular. - entry restrictions
- licensing
- enforce minimum prices
- price regulation
15Price and Output
- Firms do not cooperate, but take into account
expected reactions when deciding optimal price
and quantity strategy - hard to precisely model price and output
decisions since need to model how firms react to
one another and strategic behavior by firms - game theory
- attempts to model decisions by mapping out all
possible strategies and determining equilibrium
set of strategies
16Game Theory
- Nash equilibrium
- neither player can do better, given what the
other is doing - Im doing the best I can given what you are
doing - Youre doing the best you can given what I am
doing. - Dominant strategy
- one that is optimal no matter what an opponent
does - Im doing the best I can no matter what you
do. - Youre doing the best you can no matter what I
do. - special case of Nash equilibrium
17Prisoners Dilemma
You study, no grade change Others
study, no grade change
You some effort, big grade
increase Others no effort, modest
grade reduction
You no effort, big grade
decrease Others study, slight
grade increase
You no effort, same grade Others no
effort same grade
18Prisoners Dilemma
- What is the
- Dominant strategy
- Nash equilibrium
19Game Theory
- can get more than one set of equilibrium
strategies or no equilibrium and thus no unique
answer - examples
- battle of the sexes
- constantly changing strategies
20The Battle of the Sexes
21The Battle of the Sexes
- Two Nash Equilibria
- What are they?
- No dominant strategy
- The optimal decision of a player depends on what
the other player does
22Constantly Changing Strategies
23Constantly Changing Strategies
- Observations
- No Nash equilibrium
- Best strategy keeps changing
Player B
1
2
1
0, 0
0, -1
Player A
2
-1, 0
1, -3
24Repeated Games
- Oligopolistic firms play a repeated game.
- must choose price and output each day
- With each repetition of the Prisoners Dilemma,
firms can develop reputations about their
behavior and study the behavior of their
competitors.
25Pricing Problem
Firm 2
Low Price
High Price
Low Price
Firm 1
High Price
26Pricing Problem
- Non-repeated game
- Strategy is Low1, Low2
- Repeated game
- Tit-for-tat strategy is the most profitable
Firm 2
Low Price
High Price
Low Price
Firm 1
High Price
27Repeated Games
- Conclusion
- With repeated game
- The Prisoners Dilemma can have a cooperative
outcome with tit-for-tat strategy
28Repeated Games
- Conclusion
- This is most likely to occur in a market with
- Few firms
- Stable demand
- Stable cost
- Cooperation is difficult at best since these
factors may change in the long-run.
29Price and Output
- In general expect outcome to lie somewhere
between cooperative (collusive) solution and
competitive (price taking) solution
P
MC
Pcollusion
Range of
oligopoly prices
Pcomp.
DAR
MR
Q
Qcoll.
Qcomp.
Range of
oligopoly quantities
30EndLecture 18