Title: Monopolistic Competition and Oligopoly
1Chapter 12
- Monopolistic Competition and Oligopoly
2Monopolistic Competition
- Characteristics
- 1) Many firms
- 2) Free entry and exit
- 3) Differentiated product
3Monopolistic Competition
- The amount of monopoly power depends on the
degree of differentiation. - Examples of this very common market structure
include - Toothpaste
- Soap
- Cold remedies
4A Monopolistically CompetitiveFirm in the Short
and Long Run
/Q
/Q
Short Run
Long Run
Quantity
Quantity
5Comparison of Monopolistically CompetitiveEquilib
rium and Perfectly Competitive Equilibrium
Monopolistic Competition
Perfect Competition
/Q
/Q
Quantity
Quantity
6Oligopoly
- Characteristics
- Small number of firms
- Product differentiation may or may not exist
- Barriers to entry
7Oligopoly
- The barriers to entry are
- Natural
- Scale economies
- Patents
- Technology
- Name recognition
8Oligopoly
- The barriers to entry are
- Strategic action
- Flooding the market
- Controlling an essential input
9Oligopoly
- Management Challenges
- Strategic actions
- Rival behavior
- Question
- What are the possible rival responses to a 10
price cut by Ford?
10Oligopoly
- Equilibrium in an Oligopolistic Market
- In perfect competition, monopoly, and
monopolistic competition the producers did not
have to consider a rivals response when choosing
output and price. - In oligopoly the producers must consider the
response of competitors when choosing output and
price.
11Oligopoly
- Equilibrium in an Oligopolistic Market
- Defining Equilibrium
- Firms do the best they can and have no incentive
to change their output or price - All firms assume competitors are taking rival
decisions into account.
12Oligopoly
- Nash Equilibrium
- Each firm is doing the best it can given what its
competitors are doing.
13Oligopoly
- The Cournot Model
- Duopoly
- Two firms competing with each other
- Homogenous good
- The output of the other firm is assumed to be
fixed - Firms decide simultaneously how much to produce
14Firm 1s Output Decision
P1
Q1
15Reaction Curves and Cournot Equilibrium
Q1
100
75
50
25
Q2
25
50
75
100
16Oligopoly
- Questions
- 1) If the firms are not producing at the
Cournot equilibrium, will they adjust until the
Cournot equilibrium is reached? - 2) When is it rational to assume that a
competitors output is fixed?
17Oligopoly
The Linear Demand Curve
- An Example of the Cournot Equilibrium
- Duopoly
- Market demand is P 30 - Q where Q Q1
Q2 - MC1 MC2 0
18Oligopoly
The Linear Demand Curve
- An Example of the Cournot Equilibrium
- Firm 1s Reaction Curve
19Oligopoly
The Linear Demand Curve
- An Example of the Cournot Equilibrium
20Oligopoly
The Linear Demand Curve
- An Example of the Cournot Equilibrium
21Duopoly Example
Q1
The demand curve is P 30 - Q and both firms
have 0 marginal cost.
Q2
22Oligopoly
Profit Maximization with Collusion
23Oligopoly
Profit Maximization with Collusion
- Contract Curve
- Q1 Q2 15
- Shows all pairs of output Q1 and Q2 that
maximizes total profits - Q1 Q2 7.5
- Less output and higher profits than the Cournot
equilibrium
24Duopoly Example
Q1
30
Q2
30
25First Mover Advantage--The Stackelberg Model
- Assumptions
- One firm can set output first
- MC 0
- Market demand is P 30 - Q where Q total
output - Firm 1 sets output first and Firm 2 then makes an
output decision
26First Mover Advantage--The Stackelberg Model
- Firm 1
- Must consider the reaction of Firm 2
- Firm 2
- Takes Firm 1s output as fixed and therefore
determines output with the Cournot reaction
curve Q2 15 - 1/2Q1
27First Mover Advantage--The Stackelberg Model
28First Mover Advantage--The Stackelberg Model
- Substituting Firm 2s Reaction Curve for Q2
29First Mover Advantage--The Stackelberg Model
- Conclusion
- Firm 1s output is twice as large as firm 2s
- Firm 1s profit is twice as large as firm 2s
- Questions
- Why is it more profitable to be the first mover?
- Which model (Cournot or Stackelberg) is more
appropriate?