YEAR 12 ASSAULTS - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 5
About This Presentation
Title:

YEAR 12 ASSAULTS

Description:

D threatened v with an imitation pistol. ... 'if it weren't assize time, I would not take such language from you!!!' Common battery ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:32
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 6
Provided by: sti92
Category:
Tags: assaults | year | assize

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: YEAR 12 ASSAULTS


1
YEAR 12 ASSAULTS
  • EXTRA CASES

2
Common assault
  • - Logdon v DPP 1976
  • D threatened v with an imitation pistol. This was
    held to be an assault, since the victim believed
    that force was about to be used on her. The d had
    no intention of harming v. This was held to be
    irrelevant. Assault is not about being on the
    brink of using violence it is about creating the
    apprehension of immediate violence in the victim
  • Tuberville v Savage.1669
  • if it werent assize time, I would not take such
    language from you!!!

3
Common battery
  • Battery can be through an object/weapon
  • Fagan-the defendant accidently drove onto a
    policemans foot whilst parking the car at the
    side of the road. When he realised what had
    happened, he delayed removing the vehicle. He was
    charged with an assault (battery) using the car
    as the weapon/means of carrying out the
    battery.
  • R v Haystead (200)- the defendant punched a woman
    causing her to drop a baby she was holding. It
    was held to be a battery, caused indirectly
  • R v K (2001) school child poured acid into a
    hand dryer. This burnt the next user of the hand
    dryer- held to be an indirect battery

4
ABH- s47 OAPA
  • R v Chan Fook 1994
  • D convicted of s47 after assaulting the victim
    whom he suspected of theft. V suffered
    psychiatric injury which was held to be a form of
    ABH by the CoA, so long as it was more than mere
    emotion, stress or panic.
  • R v Savage 1991. D had intended to throw a glass
    of beer over another woman, but the glass slipped
    and broke, cutting the victim. She claimed that
    she had no mens rea in relation to the ABH
    caused. The HoL held that no extra mens rea was
    required for the ABH only the MR in relation to
    the assault/battery.

5
GBH/Malicious wounding Ss 20/18
  • R v Martin 1881
  • D was convicted under s20 . He had left a theatre
    at the end of a persormance, putting out the the
    exit door with an iron bar. The audience panicked
    and several people were injured by being crushed
    against the iron bar and door.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com