Where There's Smoke, There's Ire! - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 45
About This Presentation
Title:

Where There's Smoke, There's Ire!

Description:

Where There's Smoke, There's Ire – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:20
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 46
Provided by: woodburn
Category:
Tags: aloe | est | id | ire | smoke

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Where There's Smoke, There's Ire!


1
Where There's Smoke, There's Ire!
  • Our Story

2
OUR STORY
  • In 2000, we bought a home in Amherstburg, Ontario
    to enjoy our retirement in. It was perfect for
    us! Everything on one floor, a surrounding deck,
    and a large expanse of lawn.
  • Little did we know that, in 2002, our lives would
    be changed dramatically!

3
  • Beginning in 2002, our home became
    surrounded and infiltrated by wood smoke from our
    neighbour.
  • There was no help in getting this smoke
    stopped. Everywhere we turned we received
    sympathy but were told there was nothing they
    could do.
  • We were told that it was an issue to be
    dealt with at the municipal level.

4
  • Approaching the municipality and asking for help
    gave us more sympathy but no action. The people
    we talked with said it was a civil matter.
  • We called the Building Inspector repeatedly about
    the height of the chimney and were told it met
    code.
  • What do you think? Did it?

5

6
(No Transcript)
7
(No Transcript)
8
  • We spoke, both in person and by telephone,
    to the neighbours telling them that the smoke
    was getting into our house and making life almost
    unbearable . The response was to keep your
    windows closed. We tried to explain that the
    smoke gets in through the furnace intake, spaces
    under doors, etc.
  • They then said they would not stop burning
    , would burn what they want and to sue them if we
    didnt like it which we finally ended up doing.

9
  • We obtained a temporary court injunction in
    May of 2005, in which it is stated that they
    cannot release smoke of any kind from their
    residence.
  • Trial was booked for September 2008 but the
    defendants filed an appeal motion the week before
    trial was to commence. Trial is pending following
    their appeal hearing.
  • They want to test their chimney by burning
    for 3 days! And, cover us in smoke again? Its as
    if they are blaming the chimney instead of
    themselves, even though they, too, couldnt have
    missed the smoke out-pouring.

10
  • Five pickup loads of wood were brought in
    and dumped in their driveway, post-injunction!
    Intimidation? I dont know but it only served to
    motivate me to help others in the same situation.
  • The next photo shows a diverter added to the
    chimney that directed the smoke at our house.

11

12
  • We approached our local council and they decided
    that the chimney needed to be raised and thought
    that would solve the problem.
  • The chimney was raised, but the problem continued
    as the burning increased and the smoke billowed
    out day and night.

13
  • There was no escaping the smoke and the stench.
    Many nights I would sleep with my head under the
    sheets hoping to escape the irritants of the
    smoke.
  • I had burning eyes, a continual sore throat and
    nasal irritation that led to many sinus headaches
    and infections.

14


15
(No Transcript)
16

17
  • The brick chimney was originally an outdoor
    barbeque, that I never saw ever used.
  • He added, what I like to call, a plastic
    room around it and attached it to the side of
    the house.
  • The plastic room was made of materials, he
    told the press, that he obtained from a
    greenhouse that was being rebuilt.
  • The roof, also, is made of some type of
    corrugated plastic.
  • The plastic room remains to this day.

18
  • He then decided to add a wood stove instead
    and had it built in the far corner of the plastic
    room.
  • This chimney pipe was too short and the
    council, once again, dealt with him and he raised
    it by about 5 feet. They had him replace the
    chimney cap, hoping it would deflect the smoke
    away. It didnt.
  • Perhaps he was upset about this as he
    removed the cap the next day and burned up a
    storm.
  • The cap was later put back on.

19
(No Transcript)
20
  • The next few slides show some of the
    materials that were stored in the yard in various
    places.
  • Most were partially covered but some piles
    were just thrown together.
  • These piles contained treated wood, plywood,
    red barn wood, plastics, and scraps.
  • The smoke was nauseating and the colour of
    the smoke varied by what was being burned.
  • I knew then that we would have to do
    something!

21
(No Transcript)
22
(No Transcript)
23
(No Transcript)
24
(No Transcript)
25
(No Transcript)
26
(No Transcript)
27
(No Transcript)
28
(No Transcript)
29
(No Transcript)
30
(No Transcript)
31
(No Transcript)
32
(No Transcript)
33
(No Transcript)
34
  • Our ordeal began in 2002 ..
  •  
  • I can tell you first-hand what it is like
    when one is forced to deal with a smoke issue, as
    I have lived through it.
  •  
  • I can tell you that the stench permeates
    your entire home, your clothing, your hair, and
    you can even taste it.
  •  

35
  • Exposure to the smoke was extremely
    uncomfortable and caused burning eyes, dry
    throat, irritation of the nasal passages and
    headaches. When the smoke stopped, so did the
    symptoms.
  •  
  • There was no relief by opening windows
    because the acrid smells were like a fog covering
    our house. Buying expensive air cleaners did
    nothing to remove the odours.
  •  
  • There was no enjoying the deck and yard as
    long as the wood burning stove was in operation.

36
  • As there was no provincial or municipal
    authority to whom we could turn to for help, we
    were forced to resort to the courts.
  • In order to get the smell of the wood smoke
    out of the house, we removed and replaced the
    carpeting, ductwork, the furnace and air
    conditioning unit, and cleaned all surfaces
    including the walls. Mattresses and pillows were
    discarded as they smelled of wood smoke. It was
    an expensive project.

37
  • I can tell you the fatigue my husband felt
    after working all day and then going to our house
    until near midnight day after day to work on the
    renovations. Myself, I had all the clothing and
    every knick-knack and assorted other household
    objects to wash before bringing them back to the
    house.
  •  
  • I came to notice that there were absolutely
    no cobwebs in a house that had been vacated for
    so long. I can only assume that something in the
    smoke killed the spiders because, now that we
    have the Injunction and there is no burning, I
    again have cobwebs.

38
(No Transcript)
39
(No Transcript)
40
  • We were fortunate enough to have the means
    to seek legal help. Remember that there was no
    provincial or municipal authority which we could
    turn to for help.
  • What would happen to those that cannot
    afford legal help? Would they be forced to move
    out of their homes? Could they afford to do that?
    Would they be able to sell their home when a
    potential buyer saw or smelled the smoke? Or,
    would they have to remain in their homes with
    their children and become sick? It's a thought
    that is very disturbing to me.

41
  •  
  • I think it is high time that our
    municipalities give some thought to banning all
    wood burning in residential areas.
  • I fail to see how the public interest is
    served by permitting the unnecessary fouling of
    the air we all have the need to breathe.

42
  • To those of you that think this kind of thing
    could never happen to you, think again! It can
    happen almost overnight and not one family is
    guaranteed that they wont end up in the same
    position as we did.

43
  • Many municipalities have a no outdoor
    burning bylaw, yet the smoke from indoor burning
    is released into the air and permeates throughout
    neighbourhoods and gets into neighbours homes.
    There is no escaping it, inside or out. Where is
    the help for the victims?
  • The victims of smoke are a majority. The
    burners are not. Why is it so difficult to ban
    wood burning in residential areas?

44
  • There is no smoking in public places now,
    yet the smoke from wood burning is far more
    dangerous and travels for miles, exposing
    everyone to its dangerous toxins. Does this make
    sense to anyone?
  • Those municipalities that feel that a bylaw
    telling people what they can burn in their
    fireplaces and wood stoves is a good one are dead
    wrong. As you can see in my photos, you cannot
    control what people are burning in their homes.
  • Shirley Brandie s.brandie_at_sympatico.ca
  • Web site http//WoodBurnerSmoke.net

45
(No Transcript)
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com