American Cancer Society Cohorts: - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 94
About This Presentation
Title:

American Cancer Society Cohorts:

Description:

... ` a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z { | } ~ ... 5' S6 DTsEF7Gc(UVW*Gd t e p)8fu*9:HIJXYZghijvwxyz Ss tFTO ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:26
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 95
Provided by: 45and
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: American Cancer Society Cohorts:


1
American Cancer Society Cohorts
  • 100-Year History
  • 1950-2050

45 and Up Meeting September 20, 2007 Jeanne
Calle, PhD
2
(No Transcript)
3
Analytic Epidemiology
Mission Statement
  • To conduct and publish high-quality
    epidemiologic research to advance our
    understanding of cancer etiology and thereby
    contribute to the prevention of cancer and death
    from cancer.

4
History of ACS Follow-up Studies
  • Partnership
  • ACS researchers and volunteers
  • Began in early 1950s
  • Results
  • link between smoking and lung cancer
  • impact of obesity on cancer deaths
  • link between aspirin and colon cancer
  • impact of TSP2.5

5
ACS Historical Cohorts
  • Hammond-Horn Study
  • 1952 to 1955
  • 188,000 U.S. men, 9 states
  • 22,000 ACS volunteers
  • Cancer Prevention Study (CPS) I
  • 1959 to 1972
  • 1,000,000 U.S. men and women, 25 states
  • 68,000 ACS volunteers

6
SMOKING AND DEATH RATES-REPORT ON FORTY-FOUR
MONTHS OF FOLLOW-UP OF 187,783 MEN I. TOTAL
MORTALITY II. DEATH RATES BY CAUSE E. Cuyler
Hammond, Sc.D. and Daniel Horn, Ph.D.
N Engl J Med 1661159-1308, 1958
7
1954- Cuyler Hammond, Donald Horn, and Charles
Cameron (Medical Director of ACS) at AMA
conference in 1954
8
ACS Contemporary Cohorts
  • CPS II Mortality Cohort
  • 1982 to present - ongoing
  • 1,200,000 U.S. men and women, 50 states
  • 77,000 ACS volunteers
  • CPS II Nutrition Cohort
  • 1992 to present - ongoing
  • 184,000 U.S. men and women, 21 states
  • 7,000 ACS volunteers

9
CPS-II Cohorts
Repeat questionnaires Nutrition Cohort
1997 1999 2001 2003
1982 Baseline Questionnaire
1992 Baseline Questionnaire
1998
2002
Mortality Cohort
Nutrition Cohort
Blood
1.2 million
184,000
40,000
Buccal Cell
70,000
10
  • Goal
  • To collect and archive blood samples from
    40,000 CPS-II participants for future research

11
LifeLink Methods
  • 300 hospitals nationwide served as blood
    collection sites
  • Blood was sent overnight to a central
    biorepository
  • Sub-aliquot
  • Store in Liquid Nitrogen

12
(No Transcript)
13
(No Transcript)
14
(No Transcript)
15
(No Transcript)
16
(No Transcript)
17
(No Transcript)
18
Buccal (Cheek) Cell Collection By Mail
  • Supplement the blood specimens with DNA
    specimens from additional CPS-II Nutrition Cohort
    members

Source Feigelson H et. al. 2001 CEBP101005-8.
19
(No Transcript)
20
Buccal Cell Collection Kit
21
(No Transcript)
22
NEW ACS COHORTPlanning for CPS-3
23
CPS-3 Rationale and Objectives
24
OBJECTIVES
  • Enroll a diverse cohort of 500,000 men and women
  • 30-65 years of age
  • Never been diagnosed with cancer
  • Willing to make a long-term commitment to the
    study (by completing questionnaires every few
    years)
  • Recruitment goals
  • At least 25 minority (racial/ethnic)
    participation
  • Geographic diversity

25
WHY WE NEED CPS-3?
  • CPS-II is aging (median age77 years)
  • Changes in environment and lifestyles lead to new
    research directives
  • Ex Assessing how the rise in obesity impacts
    cancer risk
  • New scientific technologies also lead to new
    research directives

26
(No Transcript)
27
(No Transcript)
28
WHY IS CPS-3 IMPORTANT?
  • Most new large, observational studies are
    overseas.
  • Blood specimens on 500,000 individuals will be an
    entirely unique resource in the US.
  • Brings CPS studies into the 21st century and
    allows us to be well-positioned to answer new and
    important questions in the future.

29
Enrollment Venue
  • Main enrollment venue -- Relay For Life
  • Partnership with ACS volunteers
  • Efficient for large-scale enrollment
  • Committed, diverse population
  • 2006-2011

30
(No Transcript)
31
Relay For Life Sites in 2006
32
(No Transcript)
33
Advantages of Relay For Life
  • Partnership with ACS volunteer infrastructure
  • Very successful in recruiting past ACS cohorts
  • Large groups of people in one place for extended
    period of time
  • We will target 1000 events that have 1000
  • participants
  • Committed population (including minorities)
  • Critical for maintaining high follow-up rates
  • Geographic diversity

34
Limitations of Relay For Life
  • Added logistics-outdoors, weather, temporary
    facilities
  • Non-fasting specimens only
  • No centrifuge onsite
  • Difficulty in collecting some types of samples
    (ex. urine)
  • Can consider collection of some specimens after
    enrollment

35
2006 (Implementation) Pilots
  • 6 pilots in Spring 2006 (Texas, metro
    Atlanta, California)
  • 1,376 enrolled
  • Goals
  • Assess efficiency and effectiveness of enrollment
    protocol (through RFL and volunteers)
  • Assess effectiveness of partnership with Quest
    Diagnostics for blood collection, transport, and
    processing

36
Study Participation
  • Initial enrollment at RFL
  • Complete a brief survey and sign informed consent
    and HIPAA
  • Provide a waist measurement
  • Provide a small blood sample
  • Within 3 months after enrollment at RFL, mailed
    baseline survey
  • To collect complete, detailed environmental and
    lifestyle information
  • Follow-up into the future
  • Repeat surveys every two years to update exposure
    and outcome information

37
CPS-3 ENROLLMENT PROCESS
1
  • Enrollment should take 30 minutes

38
(No Transcript)
39
(No Transcript)
40
(No Transcript)
41
(No Transcript)
42
(No Transcript)
43
(No Transcript)
44
(No Transcript)
45
(No Transcript)
46
(No Transcript)
47
(No Transcript)
48
(No Transcript)
49
(No Transcript)
50
(No Transcript)
51
(No Transcript)
52
(No Transcript)
53
2006 Pilot Results
  • Successful logistics for enrollment
  • Successful collection, transport, storage of
    bloods
  • Successful recruitment of minorities
  • Cant just build it and they will come
  • - need visibility and promotion
  • Our minority group is men

54
CPS-3 Pilot Work in 2007
  • Recruitment (Phase II) Pilots
  • California 13 events
  • South Atlantic 16 events
  • High Plains 19 events
  • Implementation (Phase I) Pilots
  • 4 or 5 events per division
  • New England, Florida, Great West, Eastern
  • Pilot test Spanish-translated materials

55
Timeline for CPS-3 Enrollment
56
Geographic Diversity
Puerto Rico
57
Selection of CPS-3 States
  • Where is most of the population?
  • Selected 25 states account for 81 of US
    population
  • Where are high quality state cancer registries?
  • TN and VA not included due to quality of state
    cancer registries
  • Where are Quest Diagnostics central labs?

58
Study Oversight
  • Emory University IRB
  • Certificate of Confidentiality (NCI) pending
  • External Scientific Peer Review
  • Biospecimen Advisory Group
  • NHO CPS-3 Senior Strategy Team
  • Divisional Implementation Team

59
(No Transcript)
60
(No Transcript)
61
For More Information
  • Website (www.cancer.org/cps3)
  • Toll-free number (1-888-604-5888)
  • Email cps3_at_cancer.org

62
What to Do While Waiting for Your Cohort to Mature
  • Cross sectional studies
  • Predictors of screening
  • Predictors of weight gain
  • Any genotype/phenotype association
  • Methodologic Studies
  • Validate linkage with National Death Index
  • Validate linkage with state registries
  • DNA yield and quality from buccal cells
  • Nutrition Cohort baseline paper
  • GWS in paired blood and buccal samples
  • Transforming cryopreserved lymphocytes

63
Contributions of American Cancer Societys Cancer
Prevention Studies to Obesity Research
64
(No Transcript)
65
(No Transcript)
66
(No Transcript)
67
(No Transcript)
68
  • How is the relationship between BMI mortality
    different in smokers and sick people?

69
(No Transcript)
70
(No Transcript)
71
(No Transcript)
72
(No Transcript)
73
(No Transcript)
74
(No Transcript)
75
(No Transcript)
76
(No Transcript)
77
(No Transcript)
78
(No Transcript)
79
(No Transcript)
80
(No Transcript)
81
(No Transcript)
82
(No Transcript)
83
Relative Risk of Death from All Causes according
to Race, CPS-II Women 1982-2004
White
Relative Risk
Black
BMI
Source Calle EE. unpublished
84
Relative Risk of Death from All Causes according
to Race, CPS-II Men 1982-2004
White
Black
Relative Risk
BMI
Source Calle EE. (unpublished)
85
(No Transcript)
86
Summary of Cancer Mortality by Body Mass Index -
Men
1.3
Prostate (gt 35)
1.5
Non-Hodgkins lymphoma (gt 35)
1.5
1.7
All Cancers (gt 40)
1.7
All other cancers (gt 30)
1.7
Kidney (gt 35)
1.8
Multiple myeloma (gt 35)
1.8
Gall bladder (gt 30)
Cause of Death (Highest BMI Category)
1.9
Colon Rectum (gt 35)
1.9
Esophageal (gt 30)
2.6
Stomach (gt 35)
4.5
Pancreas (gt 35)
Liver (gt 35)
Relative Risk and 95 CI
Based on never-smoking men. Source Calle EE
et.al. NEJM 20033481625-38.
87
Summary of Cancer Mortality by Body Mass Index -
Women
1.4
Colon Rectum (gt 40)
1.5
1.5
Multiple myeloma (gt 35)
1.7
Ovarian (gt 35)
1.9
Liver (gt 35)
2.0
All Cancers (gt 40)
Non-Hodgkins lymphoma (gt 35)
2.1
2.1
Breast (gt 40)
2.5
Gall bladder (gt 30)
Cause of Death (Highest BMI Category)
2.6
All other cancers (gt 40)
2.8
Esophageal (gt 30)
3.2
Pancreas (gt 40)
4.8
Cervical (gt 35)
6.3
Kidney (gt 40)
Uterus (gt 40)
Relative Risk and 95 CI
Based on never-smoking women. Source Calle
EE et.al. NEJM 20033481625-38.
88
(No Transcript)
89
(No Transcript)
90
BMI and Breast Cancer Incidence, CPS-II
Nutrition Cohort, 1992-97
BMI at baseline in 1992
91
P for trend lt.0001
From age 18 to 1992
92
New Developments
  • With Nutrition Cohort DNA, part of a consortium
    to investigate genetic predictors of obesity
  • Obesity as a predictor of survival from different
    cancers (Nutrition Cohort
  • CPS-3 -- sadly, enrollees BMI looks just like
    US population

93
THANK YOU!
94
Confidentiality and Data Access
  • CPS-3 survey data are kept confidential by
  • Unique study ID numbers
  • Limiting access to any identifying information to
    authorized personnel only
  • Keeping study documents in a locked, limited
    access research storage room
  • Having all staff sign confidentiality forms
    (including vendors and enrollment volunteers)
  • Certificate of Confidentiality, HIPAA regulations
  • Cohort membership will not be disclosed in other
    ACS constituent databases
  • Individual results will not be shared with
    participants or their family, physicians,
    employers, insurance companies or other third
    parties
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com