Title: American Cancer Society Cohorts:
1American Cancer Society Cohorts
- 100-Year History
- 1950-2050
45 and Up Meeting September 20, 2007 Jeanne
Calle, PhD
2(No Transcript)
3Analytic Epidemiology
Mission Statement
- To conduct and publish high-quality
epidemiologic research to advance our
understanding of cancer etiology and thereby
contribute to the prevention of cancer and death
from cancer.
4History of ACS Follow-up Studies
- Partnership
- ACS researchers and volunteers
- Began in early 1950s
-
- Results
- link between smoking and lung cancer
- impact of obesity on cancer deaths
- link between aspirin and colon cancer
- impact of TSP2.5
5ACS Historical Cohorts
- Hammond-Horn Study
- 1952 to 1955
- 188,000 U.S. men, 9 states
- 22,000 ACS volunteers
- Cancer Prevention Study (CPS) I
- 1959 to 1972
- 1,000,000 U.S. men and women, 25 states
- 68,000 ACS volunteers
6SMOKING AND DEATH RATES-REPORT ON FORTY-FOUR
MONTHS OF FOLLOW-UP OF 187,783 MEN I. TOTAL
MORTALITY II. DEATH RATES BY CAUSE E. Cuyler
Hammond, Sc.D. and Daniel Horn, Ph.D.
N Engl J Med 1661159-1308, 1958
71954- Cuyler Hammond, Donald Horn, and Charles
Cameron (Medical Director of ACS) at AMA
conference in 1954
8ACS Contemporary Cohorts
- CPS II Mortality Cohort
- 1982 to present - ongoing
- 1,200,000 U.S. men and women, 50 states
- 77,000 ACS volunteers
- CPS II Nutrition Cohort
- 1992 to present - ongoing
- 184,000 U.S. men and women, 21 states
- 7,000 ACS volunteers
9CPS-II Cohorts
Repeat questionnaires Nutrition Cohort
1997 1999 2001 2003
1982 Baseline Questionnaire
1992 Baseline Questionnaire
1998
2002
Mortality Cohort
Nutrition Cohort
Blood
1.2 million
184,000
40,000
Buccal Cell
70,000
10- Goal
- To collect and archive blood samples from
40,000 CPS-II participants for future research
11LifeLink Methods
- 300 hospitals nationwide served as blood
collection sites - Blood was sent overnight to a central
biorepository - Sub-aliquot
- Store in Liquid Nitrogen
12(No Transcript)
13(No Transcript)
14(No Transcript)
15(No Transcript)
16(No Transcript)
17(No Transcript)
18Buccal (Cheek) Cell Collection By Mail
-
- Supplement the blood specimens with DNA
specimens from additional CPS-II Nutrition Cohort
members
Source Feigelson H et. al. 2001 CEBP101005-8.
19(No Transcript)
20Buccal Cell Collection Kit
21(No Transcript)
22NEW ACS COHORTPlanning for CPS-3
23CPS-3 Rationale and Objectives
24OBJECTIVES
- Enroll a diverse cohort of 500,000 men and women
- 30-65 years of age
- Never been diagnosed with cancer
- Willing to make a long-term commitment to the
study (by completing questionnaires every few
years) - Recruitment goals
- At least 25 minority (racial/ethnic)
participation - Geographic diversity
25WHY WE NEED CPS-3?
- CPS-II is aging (median age77 years)
- Changes in environment and lifestyles lead to new
research directives - Ex Assessing how the rise in obesity impacts
cancer risk - New scientific technologies also lead to new
research directives
26(No Transcript)
27(No Transcript)
28WHY IS CPS-3 IMPORTANT?
- Most new large, observational studies are
overseas. - Blood specimens on 500,000 individuals will be an
entirely unique resource in the US. - Brings CPS studies into the 21st century and
allows us to be well-positioned to answer new and
important questions in the future.
29Enrollment Venue
- Main enrollment venue -- Relay For Life
- Partnership with ACS volunteers
- Efficient for large-scale enrollment
- Committed, diverse population
- 2006-2011
30(No Transcript)
31Relay For Life Sites in 2006
32(No Transcript)
33 Advantages of Relay For Life
- Partnership with ACS volunteer infrastructure
- Very successful in recruiting past ACS cohorts
- Large groups of people in one place for extended
period of time - We will target 1000 events that have 1000
- participants
- Committed population (including minorities)
- Critical for maintaining high follow-up rates
- Geographic diversity
34 Limitations of Relay For Life
- Added logistics-outdoors, weather, temporary
facilities - Non-fasting specimens only
- No centrifuge onsite
- Difficulty in collecting some types of samples
(ex. urine) - Can consider collection of some specimens after
enrollment
35 2006 (Implementation) Pilots
- 6 pilots in Spring 2006 (Texas, metro
Atlanta, California) - 1,376 enrolled
- Goals
- Assess efficiency and effectiveness of enrollment
protocol (through RFL and volunteers) - Assess effectiveness of partnership with Quest
Diagnostics for blood collection, transport, and
processing
36 Study Participation
- Initial enrollment at RFL
- Complete a brief survey and sign informed consent
and HIPAA - Provide a waist measurement
- Provide a small blood sample
- Within 3 months after enrollment at RFL, mailed
baseline survey - To collect complete, detailed environmental and
lifestyle information - Follow-up into the future
- Repeat surveys every two years to update exposure
and outcome information
37CPS-3 ENROLLMENT PROCESS
1
- Enrollment should take 30 minutes
38(No Transcript)
39(No Transcript)
40(No Transcript)
41(No Transcript)
42(No Transcript)
43(No Transcript)
44(No Transcript)
45(No Transcript)
46(No Transcript)
47(No Transcript)
48(No Transcript)
49(No Transcript)
50(No Transcript)
51(No Transcript)
52(No Transcript)
53 2006 Pilot Results
- Successful logistics for enrollment
- Successful collection, transport, storage of
bloods - Successful recruitment of minorities
- Cant just build it and they will come
- - need visibility and promotion
- Our minority group is men
54 CPS-3 Pilot Work in 2007
- Recruitment (Phase II) Pilots
- California 13 events
- South Atlantic 16 events
- High Plains 19 events
- Implementation (Phase I) Pilots
- 4 or 5 events per division
- New England, Florida, Great West, Eastern
- Pilot test Spanish-translated materials
55 Timeline for CPS-3 Enrollment
56 Geographic Diversity
Puerto Rico
57 Selection of CPS-3 States
- Where is most of the population?
- Selected 25 states account for 81 of US
population - Where are high quality state cancer registries?
- TN and VA not included due to quality of state
cancer registries - Where are Quest Diagnostics central labs?
58 Study Oversight
- Emory University IRB
- Certificate of Confidentiality (NCI) pending
- External Scientific Peer Review
- Biospecimen Advisory Group
- NHO CPS-3 Senior Strategy Team
- Divisional Implementation Team
59(No Transcript)
60(No Transcript)
61For More Information
- Website (www.cancer.org/cps3)
- Toll-free number (1-888-604-5888)
- Email cps3_at_cancer.org
62What to Do While Waiting for Your Cohort to Mature
- Cross sectional studies
- Predictors of screening
- Predictors of weight gain
- Any genotype/phenotype association
- Methodologic Studies
- Validate linkage with National Death Index
- Validate linkage with state registries
- DNA yield and quality from buccal cells
- Nutrition Cohort baseline paper
- GWS in paired blood and buccal samples
- Transforming cryopreserved lymphocytes
63Contributions of American Cancer Societys Cancer
Prevention Studies to Obesity Research
64(No Transcript)
65(No Transcript)
66(No Transcript)
67(No Transcript)
68- How is the relationship between BMI mortality
different in smokers and sick people?
69(No Transcript)
70(No Transcript)
71(No Transcript)
72(No Transcript)
73(No Transcript)
74(No Transcript)
75(No Transcript)
76(No Transcript)
77(No Transcript)
78(No Transcript)
79(No Transcript)
80(No Transcript)
81(No Transcript)
82(No Transcript)
83Relative Risk of Death from All Causes according
to Race, CPS-II Women 1982-2004
White
Relative Risk
Black
BMI
Source Calle EE. unpublished
84Relative Risk of Death from All Causes according
to Race, CPS-II Men 1982-2004
White
Black
Relative Risk
BMI
Source Calle EE. (unpublished)
85(No Transcript)
86Summary of Cancer Mortality by Body Mass Index -
Men
1.3
Prostate (gt 35)
1.5
Non-Hodgkins lymphoma (gt 35)
1.5
1.7
All Cancers (gt 40)
1.7
All other cancers (gt 30)
1.7
Kidney (gt 35)
1.8
Multiple myeloma (gt 35)
1.8
Gall bladder (gt 30)
Cause of Death (Highest BMI Category)
1.9
Colon Rectum (gt 35)
1.9
Esophageal (gt 30)
2.6
Stomach (gt 35)
4.5
Pancreas (gt 35)
Liver (gt 35)
Relative Risk and 95 CI
Based on never-smoking men. Source Calle EE
et.al. NEJM 20033481625-38.
87Summary of Cancer Mortality by Body Mass Index -
Women
1.4
Colon Rectum (gt 40)
1.5
1.5
Multiple myeloma (gt 35)
1.7
Ovarian (gt 35)
1.9
Liver (gt 35)
2.0
All Cancers (gt 40)
Non-Hodgkins lymphoma (gt 35)
2.1
2.1
Breast (gt 40)
2.5
Gall bladder (gt 30)
Cause of Death (Highest BMI Category)
2.6
All other cancers (gt 40)
2.8
Esophageal (gt 30)
3.2
Pancreas (gt 40)
4.8
Cervical (gt 35)
6.3
Kidney (gt 40)
Uterus (gt 40)
Relative Risk and 95 CI
Based on never-smoking women. Source Calle
EE et.al. NEJM 20033481625-38.
88(No Transcript)
89(No Transcript)
90BMI and Breast Cancer Incidence, CPS-II
Nutrition Cohort, 1992-97
BMI at baseline in 1992
91P for trend lt.0001
From age 18 to 1992
92New Developments
- With Nutrition Cohort DNA, part of a consortium
to investigate genetic predictors of obesity - Obesity as a predictor of survival from different
cancers (Nutrition Cohort - CPS-3 -- sadly, enrollees BMI looks just like
US population
93THANK YOU!
94 Confidentiality and Data Access
- CPS-3 survey data are kept confidential by
- Unique study ID numbers
- Limiting access to any identifying information to
authorized personnel only - Keeping study documents in a locked, limited
access research storage room - Having all staff sign confidentiality forms
(including vendors and enrollment volunteers) - Certificate of Confidentiality, HIPAA regulations
- Cohort membership will not be disclosed in other
ACS constituent databases - Individual results will not be shared with
participants or their family, physicians,
employers, insurance companies or other third
parties