MSc IT

1 / 39
About This Presentation
Title:

MSc IT

Description:

We will begin by seeing how the Black model can be used to price bond and ... A casually specified model may give rise to arbitrage opportunities (for example, ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:22
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 40
Provided by: sju2

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: MSc IT


1
Chapter 23 Interest Rate Models
2
Introduction
  • We will begin by seeing how the Black model can
    be used to price bond and interest rate options.
  • The Black model is a version of the Black-Scholes
    model for which the underlying asset is a futures
    contract.
  • Next, we see how the Black-Scholes approach to
    option pricing applies to bonds.
  • Finally, we examine binomial interest rate
    models, in particular the Black-Derman-Toy model.

3
Bond Options, Caps, and the Black Model
  • If we assume that the bond forward price is
    lognormally distributed with constant volatility
    ?, we obtain the Black formula for a bond option
  • (23.3)
  • where
  • and F is an abbreviation for the bond forward
    price F0,T P(T,T s), where Pt(T,T s)
    denotes the time-t price of a zero-coupon bond
    purchased at T and paying 1 at time T s.

4
Bond Options, Caps, and the Black Model
  • One way for a borrower to hedge interest rate
    risk is by entering into a call option on a
    forward rate agreement (FRA), with strike price
    KR.
  • This option, called a caplet, at time T s pays
  • Payoff to caplet max 0, RT(T, T s) KR
    (23.5)
  • An interest rate cap is a collection of caplets.
  • Suppose a borrower has a floating rate loan with
    interest payments at times ti, i 1, . . ., n. A
    cap would make the series of payments
  • Cap payment at time ti1 max 0, Rti(ti, ti1)
    KR (23.8)

5
Bond Pricing
  • Some difficulties of bond pricing are
  • A casually specified model may give rise to
    arbitrage opportunities (for example, if the
    yield curve is assumed to be flat).
  • In general, hedging a bond portfolio based on
    duration does not result in a perfect hedge.

6
An equilibrium equation for bonds
  • When the short-term interest rate is the only
    source of uncertainty, the following partial
    differential equation must be satisfied by any
    zero-coupon bond
  • (23.26)
  • where r is the short-term interest rate, which
    follows the Itô process dr a(r)dt ?(r)dZ, and
    ?(r,t) is the Sharp ratio for dZ.
  • This equation characterizes claims that are a
    function of the interest rate. The risk-neutral
    process for the interest rate is obtained by
    subtracting the risk premium from the drift
  • dr a(r) ? ?(r)?(r,t)dt ?(r)dZ (23.27)

7
An equilibrium equation for bonds
  • Given a zero-coupon bond, Cox et al. (1985) show
    that the solution to equation (23.26) is
  • (23.28)
  • where E represents the expectation taken with
    respect to risk-neutral probabilities and R(t,T)
    is the random variable representing the
    cumulative interest rate over time
  • (23.29)
  • Thus, to value a zero-coupon bond, we take the
    expectation over all the discount factors implied
    by these paths.

8
An equilibrium equation for bonds
  • In summary, an approach to modeling bond prices
    is exactly the same procedure used to price
    options on stock
  • We begin with a model of the interest rate and
    then use equation (23.26) to obtain a partial
    differential equation that describes the bond
    price.
  • Next, using the PDE together with boundary
    conditions, we can determine the price of the
    bond.

9
Delta-Gamma Approximations for Bonds
  • Equation (23.26) implies that
  • (23.20)
  • Using the risk-neutral distribution, bonds are
    priced to earn the risk-free rate.
  • Thus, the delta-gamma-theta approximation for the
    change in a bond price holds exactly if the
    interest rate moves one standard deviation.
  • However, the Greeks for a bond are not exactly
    the same as duration and convexity.

10
Equilibrium Short-Rate Bond Price Models
  • We discuss three bond pricing models based on
    equation (23.26), in which all bond prices are
    driven by the short-term interest rate, r.
  • the Rendleman-Bartter model,
  • the Vasicek model,
  • the Cox-Ingersoll-Ross model.
  • They differ in their specification of ?(r), ?(r),
    ?(r).

11
Equilibrium Short-Rate Bond Price Models
  • The simplest models of the short-term interest
    rate are those in which the interest rate follows
    arithmetic or geometric Brownian motion. For
    example,
  • dr adt ?dZ (23.31)
  • In this specification, the short-rate is
    normally distributed with mean r0 ar and
    variance ?2t.
  • There are several objections to this model
  • The short-rate can be negative.
  • The drift in the short-rate is constant.
  • The volatility of the short-rate is the same
    whether the rate is high or low.

12
The Rendleman-Bartter model
  • The Rendleman-Bartter model assumes that the
    short-rate follows geometric Brownian motion
  • dr ardt ?rdz (23.32)
  • An objection to this model is that interest rates
    can be arbitrarily high. In practice, we would
    expect rates to exhibit mean reversion.

13
The Vasicek model
  • The Vasicek model incorporates mean reversion
  • dr a(b ? r)dt ?dz (23.33)
  • This is an Ornstein-Uhlenbeck process. The a(b ?
    r)dt term induces mean reversion.
  • It is possible for interest rates to become
    negative and the variability of interest rates is
    independent of the level of rates.

14
The Cox-Ingersoll-Ross model
  • The Cox-Ingersoll-Ross (CIR) model assumes a
    short-term interest rate model of the form
  • dr a(b ? r)dt ??r dz (23.35)
  • The model satisfies all the objections to the
    earlier models
  • It is impossible for interest rates to be
    negative.
  • As the short-rate rises, the volatility of the
    short-rate also rises.
  • The short-rate exhibits mean reversion.

15
Comparing Vasicek and CIR
  • Yield curves generated by the Vasicek and CIR
    models

16
A Binomial Interest Rate Model
  • Binomial interest rate models permit the interest
    rate to move randomly over time.
  • Notation
  • h is the length of the binomial period. Here a
    period is 1 year, i.e., h1.
  • rt0(t, T) is the forward interest rate at time t0
    for time t to time T.
  • rt0(t, T j) is the interest rate prevailing from
    t to T, where the rate is quoted at time t0 lt t
    and the state is j.
  • At any point in time t0, there is a set of both
    spot and implied forward zero-coupon bond prices,
    Pt0(t, T j).
  • p is the risk-neutral probability of an up move.

17
A Binomial Interest Rate Model
  • Three-period interest rate tree of the 1-year
    rate

18
Zero-coupon bond prices
  • Because the tree can be used at any node to value
    zero-coupon bonds of any maturity, the tree also
    generates implied forward interest rates of all
    maturities, as well as volatilities of implied
    forward rates.
  • Thus, we can equivalently specify a binomial
    interest rate tree in terms of
  • interest rates,
  • zero-coupon bond prices, or
  • volatilities of implied forward interest rates.

19
Zero-coupon bond prices
  • We can value a bond by considering separately
    each path the interest rate can take.
  • Each path implies a realized discount factor.
  • We then compute the expected discount factor,
    using risk-neutral probabilities.
  • All bond valuation models implicitly calculate
    the following equation
  • (23.44)
  • where E is the expected discount factor and ri
    represents the time-i rate.

20
Zero-coupon bond prices
  • The volatility of the bond price is different
    from the behavior of a stock.
  • With a stock, uncertainty about the future stock
    price increases with horizon.
  • With a bond, volatility of the bond price
    initially grows with time. However, as the bond
    approaches maturity, volatility declines because
    of the boundary condition that the bond price
    approached 1.

21
Yields and expected interest rates
  • Uncertainty causes bond yields to be lower than
    the expected average interest rate.
  • The discrepancy between yields and average
    interest rates increases with volatility.
  • Therefore, we cannot price a bond by using the
    expected interest rate.

22
Option pricing
  • Using the binomial tree to price a bond option
    works the same way as bond pricing.
  • Suppose we have a call option with strike price K
    on a (T ? t)-year zero-coupon bond, with the
    option expiring in t ? t0 periods.
  • The expiration value of the option is
  • O (t, j) max 0, Pt(t, T j) K (23.46)
  • To price the option we can work recursively
    backward through the tree using risk-neutral
    pricing, as with an option on a stock..
  • The value one period earlier at the node j is
  • O (t ? h, j) Pt ? h (t ? h, t j)
  • ? p ? O (t, 2 ? j 1) (1 ? p) ? O (m, 2 ?
    j) (23.47)

23
Option pricing
  • In the same way, we can value an option on a
    yield, or an option on any instrument that is a
    function of the interest rate.
  • Delta-hedging works for the bond option just as
    for a stock option.
  • The underlying asset is a zero-coupon bond
    maturing at T, since that will be a (T ?
    t)-period bond in period t.
  • Each period, the delta-hedged portfolio of the
    option and underlying asset is financed by the
    short-term bond, paying whatever one-period
    interest rate prevails at that node.

24
The Black-Derman-Toy Model
  • The models we have examined are arbitrage-free in
    a world consistent with their assumptions. In the
    real world, however, they will generate apparent
    arbitrage opportunities, i.e., observed prices
    will not match theoretical prices.
  • Matching a model to fit the data is called
    calibration.
  • This calibration ensures that it matches observed
    yields and volatilities, but not necessarily the
    evolution of the yield curve.
  • The Black-Derman-Toy (BDT) tree is a binomial
    interest rate tree calibrated to match
    zero-coupon yields and a particular set of
    volatilities.

25
The Black-Derman-Toy Model
  • The basic idea of the BDT model is to compute a
    binomial tree of short-term interest rates, with
    a flexible enough structure to match the data.
  • Consider market information about bonds that we
    would like to match

26
The Black-Derman-Toy Model
  • Black, Derman, and Toy describe their tree as
    driven by the short-term rate, which they assume
    is lognormally distributed.

27
The Black-Derman-Toy Model
  • For each period in the tree, there are two
    parameters
  • Rih can be though of as a rate level parameter at
    a given time and
  • ?i can be though of as a volatility parameter.
  • These parameters can be used to match the tree
    with the data.

28
The Black-Derman-Toy Model
  • The volatilities are measured in the tree as
    follows
  • Let the time-h price of a zero-coupon bond
    maturing at T when the time-t short-term rate is
    r(h) be Ph, T, r(h).
  • The yield of the bond is
  • yh, T, r(h) Ph, T, r(h)?1/(T ? h) ? 1
  • At time h, the short-term rate can take on the
    two values ru and rd. The annualized lognormal
    yield volatility is then
  • (23.48)

29
The Black-Derman-Toy Model
  • The BDT tree, which depicts 1-year effective
    annual rates, is constructed using the above
    market data

30
The Black-Derman-Toy Model
  • The tree behaves differently from binomial trees.
  • Unlike a stock-price tree, the nodes are not
    necessarily centered on the previous periods
    nodes.
  • This is because the tree is constructed to match
    the data.

31
The Black-Derman-Toy Model
  • Verifying that the tree is consistent with the
    data
  • To verify that the tree matches the yield curve,
    we need to compute the prices of zero-coupon
    bonds with maturities of 1, 2, 3, and 4 years.
  • To verify the volatilities, we need to compute
    the prices of 1-, 2-, and 3-year zero-coupon
    bonds at year 1, and then compute the yield
    volatilities of those bonds.

32
The Black-Derman-Toy Model
  • The tree of 1-year bond prices implied by the BDT
    interest rate tree

33
The Black-Derman-Toy Model
  • Verifying yields

34
The Black-Derman-Toy Model
  • Verifying volatilities
  • For each bond, we need to compute implied bond
    yields in year 1 and then compute the volatility.
  • Using equation (23.48), the yield volatility
  • for the 2-year bond (1-year bond in year 1) is
  • for the 3-year bond in year 1 is

35
Constructing a Black-Derman-Toy tree
  • Given the data, how do we generate the tree?
  • We start at early nodes and work to the later
    nodes, building the tree outward.
  • The first node is given by the prevailing 1-year
    rate. The 1-year bond price is
  • 0.9091 1 / (1R0) (23.49)
  • Thus, R0 0.10.

36
Constructing a Black-Derman-Toy tree
  • For the second node, the year-1 price of a 1-year
    bond is P(1, 2, ru) or P(1, 2, rd). We require
    that two conditions be satisfied
  • (23.50)
  • (23.51)
  • The second equation gives us ? 0.1, which
    enables us to solve the first equation to obtain
    R1 0.1082.
  • In the same way, it is possible to solve for the
    parameters for each subsequent period.

37
Black-Derman-Toy examples
  • Caplets and caps
  • An interest rate cap pays the difference between
    the realized interest rate in a period and the
    interest cap rate, if the difference is positive.
  • The payments in each node in a tree are the
    present value of the cap payments for the
    interest rate at that node.

38
Black-Derman-Toy examples
  • Forward rate agreements (FRA)
  • The standard FRA calls for settlement at maturity
    of the loan, when the interest payment is made.
  • If r(3, 4) is the 1-year rate in year 3, the
    payoff to a standard FRA 4 years from today is
  • (23.54)
  • We can compute by taking the discounted
    expectation along a binomial tree of r(3, 4) paid
    in year 4 and dividing by P(0, 4).

39
Black-Derman-Toy examples
  • Forward rate agreements (FRA)
  • Eurodollar-style settlement, calls for payment at
    the time the loan is made.
  • If a FRA settles on the borrowing date in year
    3, then
  • (23.55)
  • We can compute by taking the discounted
    expectation along a binomial tree of r(3, 4) paid
    in year 3, and dividing by P(0, 3).
  • There is no marking-to-market prior to
    settlement, but the timing of settlement is
    mismatched with the timing of interest payments.
  • Thus, the two settlement procedures generate
    different fair forward interest rates.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)