Labeling Theory - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 8
About This Presentation
Title:

Labeling Theory

Description:

Labeling Theory. Basic issue: if definitions of situations are determined by ... (the purpose of a trial where the law is a blunt instrument with few options) ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:43
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 9
Provided by: douglas59
Category:
Tags: blunt | labeling | theory

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Labeling Theory


1
Labeling Theory
  • Basic issue if definitions of situations are
    determined by language and interaction, why not
    definitions of individuals and groups?
  • Stigma (Erving Goffman)
  • mostly informal situations
  • people are categorized as not quite human
  • socially isolate ostracized
  • A form of labeling
  • Formal labeling also exists

2
Labeling theory
  • The self is formed and reformed via interactions
    with a community
  • Labeling may affect the self
  • It may become true
  • Edwin Lemert it may become really true
  • Primary deviance
  • Secondary deviance
  • Thomas Scheff It may become true for all
    practical purposes (contra Walter Gove)

3
Labeling theory how could a label become
true?NOTE we did not cover this slide in
class, but Stark covers Liska in the textbook
  • Allen E. Liska deviant labels may
  • Limit legitimate economic/occupational
    opportunities
  • Limit interpersonal relations
  • Affect self-conceptions

4
Official labeling
  • done via an organized system of laws and/or
    procedures
  • always categorizes people into one of a handful
    of contrasting categories
  • peoples individual beliefs no longer matter
  • effects are typically extremely important for the
    persons life

5
Edwin Schur, The Labeling of Deviance general
processes when acquiring a label
  • NOTE we did not cover this slide, so ignore it.
  • negotiation
  • stereotyping
  • retrospective interpretation
  • role engulfment

6
Why is it a special issue in law enforcement
social control?
  • Need for categorization (the purpose of a
    trialwhere the law is a blunt instrument with
    few options)
  • The stakes are high
  • The situation is often uncertain and ambiguous

7
Uncertainty why?
  • There is often little direct evidence
  • Witnesses lie, or are mistaken, or cover up, or
    arent credible
  • Evidence may be merely suggestive, not conclusive
  • Money, personnel, and time are always tight
    there is not the luxury to deal with every last
    bit of evidence (unlike on CSI)

8
High stakes?
  • At issue Life, death, property, safety, and
    careers
  • Families want justice
  • There is political pressure (and punishment)
    for failure to convict, especially in high
    profile cases, but also over time.
  • Pressure extends to witnesses (both personal and
    professional pressures)
  • One must suppress uncertainty and never show it
    to outsiders (party line)
  • There is no reward for acquitting an innocent
    person (theres still an uncleared crime on the
    books)
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com