Project Impact - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 39
About This Presentation
Title:

Project Impact

Description:

Project Impact – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:29
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 40
Provided by: david2264
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Project Impact


1
Project Impact
  • Making Medical Technology And Services
    Affordable And Available To The Economies Of
    Developing Countries

2
4 Billion at Bottom of Pyramid
  • Per capita less than 1,500
  • A billion people have per capita income less than
    1/day.
  • Income gap between rich and poor is growing
    richest 20 account for 85 of income
  • Extreme inequity of wealth distribution
    reinforces view that poor cannot participate in
    global economy
  • Could swell to more than 6 billion people next 40
    years
  • Bottom 4 billion of humanity represent
    multi-trillion market

3
Social Objectives
  • Focus on pricing disparity where goods and
    services that provide for basic human needs, such
    as sight or hearing (or life itself!), are
    receding further and further from the reach of
    the poor.
  • Demystify costs, gain control of means for
    production and pricing to make products
    affordable to poorer two thirds of humanity
  • Create service delivery models to provide
    affordable and high quality products and services
    where price and quality become driving forces to
    convert need into demand

4
Aravind Eye Hospital
  • 220,000 eye surgeries per year (10 of surgery in
    US)
  • 2 million patients/year examined/treated
  • 47 pay nothing, 18 pay two-thirds cost, 35 pay
    well above cost
  • For every 1 spent, 1.60 is earned
  • Able to be self sustaining and grow while staying
    true to social mission of serving poor
  • Replicated in Nepal, India, Egypt, Malawi, Kenya,
    Guatemala, El Salvador, others

5
Dr. Venkataswamy
6
(No Transcript)
7
Surgery at Aravind
8
Financial Viability
Through a unique fee system effective
management, Aravind provides free eye care to 2/3
of its patients. For each 1 spent, 1.60 is
earned
9
(No Transcript)
10
Revenue
Expenses
Profit
11
(No Transcript)
12
(No Transcript)
13
(No Transcript)
14
Al Noor/Magrabi Eye Hospital, Cairo
15
Principles of Cost Recovery
  • Understanding the local paying capacity
  • Pricing for affordability
  • Pricing for all economic strata-multi-tiered
    pricing
  • Improving efficiency to decrease costs
  • Improve quality to create market demand
  • Satisfying customers/being accountable
  • Consumers become program planners
  • Increase volume to lower unit costs and prices
  • Choice to use profit production capacity to
    serve poor
  • Nestle control in hands of those doing the work
  • Shift of resources from operating costs to start
    up costs for new programs

16
Why is medical technology not affordable?
  • WTO keeps drug prices high under Agreement on
    Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property
    Rights (TRIPS). Patents on life-saving drugs are
    treated the same way as patents on ice-cream
    machines.
  • Bureaucratic Imperative of Medical Industry The
    ethical responsibility of maximizing return
    on investment to share-holders reduces the
    accessibility and affordability of technology
    oriented medical care in developing countries
  • Western companies do not simplify and make
    appropriate for developing countries

17
Aurolab
  • Established in 1992 as non-profit business trust
  • Organizational mandate to maximize product
    availability and affordability to the poor
  • Proven track record in the manufacture of IOLs,
    suture, drugs, eye glasses
  • Associated with Aravind Eye Hospital
  • One of largest IOL manufacturer in world 600,000
    per year sold to 86 countries
  • FDA and CE Mark regulatory fulfillment
  • Uses profit and production capacity to serve
    the poor and build capacity

18
Reinventing Pricing
  • Pricing is the Issue, Not Cost
  • Intraocular lenses 100 vs. 4.5
  • Suture 200 vs 30
  • Pharmaceuticals 60 vs. .91
  • Hearing aid 1500 vs. 50

19
Aurolab Financial Sustainability
  • 4.3 million in Annual Sales
  • 52 Margin (2.2M Net Income)
  • Sustained Growth, little marketing costs

20
Cornea
IOL Implantation into the lens bag
Iris
Lens bag
IOL
21
Clean Room Final Quality Control
22
Next Generation IOL
  • Hydrophobic Acrylic Foldable IOL
  • Alcon has 50 and AMO 20 of IOL market with this
    material
  • 13M IOLs sold WW in 2002 1.4M in USA
  • Foldable IOLS account for 96 of US Market
  • 1.6B US Market
  • Developed novel biocompatible material exceeding
    material properties of competition
  • Production in less than a year
  • Give IP and know how to Aurolab for social
    mission and license to others for Project Impact
    financial return to support new technology
    development

23
Suture Cold Forming Needles
24
Suture Micro grinding needle tip
25
Dr. P. Balakrishnan Managing Director Aurolab
26
How Affordable Technology Drives Sustainability
  • Availability of affordable intraocular lenses
    have enabled eye care programs worldwide to
    provide better quality visual outcomes
  • Vision with IOL attracts surgical patients at
    early stage when more still work and can
    contribute toward cost
  • Programs become market driving to increase
    market demand which has led to financial
    sustainability

27
Playing the Game
  • Beg others to help you or gain control of
    technology, production, distribution and pricing
  • Transform corporate behavior by playing the
    corporate game and being competitive
  • Difficult to change corporate behavior by
    pronouncement better to compete on their ground
    to get them to change how they price their
    product for poorer markets
  • Effect of Aurolab pricing lowers prices worldwide

28
Tech Transfer Modus Operandi
  • Starting assumption things dont really cost
    that much to make
  • Demystify cost and technology
  • Find RD people who have worked in leading
    companies with large RD budgets
  • Gain control of technology, production,
    distribution and pricing
  • Scale costs to result in affordable pricing to
    end user
  • Transform the market place by being price
    competitive

29
What can medical companies do to put me out of
business?
  • Grand gestures instead of small gestures
  • Find ways to sell products in poor countries at
    lower prices in a way that does not compromise
    profitability in developed country markets
  • Develop distribution that minimizes leakage into
    higher priced developed country markets
  • Put more money into developing country diseases
  • Practice generosity

30
The Global Challenge of Hearing Impairment
  • WHO estimates 250 million disabling hearing
    impairment
  • Average Price in 2003 was US 1,500
  • Hearing aid companies are oriented to high
    profit margins and low volume
  • Only 6 million sold /year but only 12 go to
    developing countries
  • Need is at least 32 million units/yr.
  • Poor quality low-priced hearing aids create
    client dissatisfaction
  • Lack of cost-effective, financially
    self-sustaining service delivery models for the
    lower economic groups

31
Affordable Hearing Aid
32
Affordable Hearing Aid
  • Digitally programmable hearing aid usually priced
    at 1500 is being sold for 0 to 200
  • Manufacturing operational January 2003
  • Per unit cost under 50
  • US FDA approval CE Mark Certification
  • Clinical trials completed at U. of Washington
    with successful results
  • Sustainable service delivery models developed
    that deliver hearing aids to all economic strata
  • Multi-tiered pricing implemented locally
    globally
  • 2nd generation high powered digital almost
    complete
  • Partnerships developed with Lions, PDA, Al Noor,
    and other social enterprise distributors

33
Affordable AIDs Drugs?
  • 42 million HIV positive
  • 4 get antiretroviral treatment in poor countries
  • Feasibility study
  • US 40/yr/patient drug cost?
  • Legally possible to produce with violating trade
    agreements?
  • Create market driving service delivery model
    (bottom up) to create market demand instead of
    top down?

34
Compassionate Capitalism
  • Choice to use profit and production capacity to
    serve poor
  • Philanthropy that by-passes the middle man
  • Pricing for affordability to poor generating
    sufficient revenue to grow and flourish
  • Selling the product for the least amount of money
    rather than the most
  • Profit is a means to an end and not the end
    itself
  • Return on investment to the community
    (beneficiaries) and not to shareholders

35
Financing Dilemma
  • Under capitalization
  • Lack of adequate financing mechanism for social
    enterprise
  • Traditional donors do not want to invest in
    anything with appearance of risk
  • VCs want to know exit strategy and how much they
    will get
  • Donors /investors convolute approach of social
    enterprise
  • Inefficient capital market for social enterprise

36
Non profit Merger and Acquisition
  • Northwest Lions Foundation for Sight and Hearing
    (NLFSH) and Project Impact developing a
    non-profit partnership largest eye bank
  • NW will buy over time, the assets of AHAP
  • NLFSH shares responsibility for financing and
    executing AHAPs core functions product
    development, distribution of hearing aids through
    non-profit channels, outreach to audiologists,
    and product fulfillment and service activities.
  • Project Impact to continue playing role in
    raising funds, developing international
    distribution channels, and technology development
    for AHAP.

37
What Project Impact Gets
  • Assurance of sufficient capitalization and
    managerial wherewithal
  • Financial strength
  • Guaranteed financing for 4 years for new Project
    Impact technology development ventures
  • Part owner of commercial asset-future upside
  • Assurance of adherence to social mission
  • Exit strategy that allows AHAP to be placed in
    competent hands and allows us to stick with core
    competencies
  • Sleep well and wake up happy

38
How Ashoka has Helped
  • Pro bono legal support of Fried Frank Shriver
    Harris and Jacobson
  • Donor / investor network
  • Collegiality with other Ashoka fellows
  • Declaration that the frog is really a prince
  • Psychological benefit of stipend to support risk
    taking behavior
  • Involvement with Ashoka to develop Social
    Financial Sector

39
David Green Formula for Getting By
  • Make do with very little
  • Perseverance
  • Embrace the possibility of failure
  • Act in spite fear and uncertainty
  • Plan for sustainability to get out of dependency
  • Boot strapping on a shoestring necessary in
    beginning but should be followed by proper
    capitalization, once certain risks have been
    reduced-- to reduce stress and have a life!
  • Thinking makes it so
  • Everyone has the same nerve endings
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com