Celestial Mechanics II - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 23
About This Presentation
Title:

Celestial Mechanics II

Description:

Coupled system of equations: all bodies affect each other! ... 33% of runs resulted in ice giant ejection, the rest in (satellite-conserving) close encounters ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:34
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 24
Provided by: bjornda
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Celestial Mechanics II


1
Celestial Mechanics II
2
This Lecture
  • N-body problem
  • General Equation of Motion
  • Example of numerical solutions
  • perturbed motion
  • Research papers

3
Why is this important?
  • Accurate ephemerides
  • Long-term orbital evolution studies
  • Scientifically interesting problems can be
    studied
  • Predict future behaviour of PHAs

Bild http//www.cfa.harvard.edu/iau/Animations/An
imations.html
4
N-body Equation of Motion
  • Coupled system of equations all bodies affect
    each other!
  • ? In inertial Cartesian system, arbitrarily
    placed origo
  • With respect to the Sun ?

5
N-body Equation of Motion
Separate Sun from other bodies and simplify
notations!
6
A Note on Calculation Cost
  • All bodies influence each other!
  • With 103 asteroids and 8 planets, we have 1008
    coupled differential equations.
  • But asteroids do not affect the planets or each
    other measurably waste of time.
  • Only apply this equation for the planets and
    treat each asteroid as a massless particle in the
    combined planetary gravity field!

7
Massless particle
Calculate planetary r(t) and use it as source
function when solving this equation for each
asteroid, individually. Thus we Have 8 coupled,
and 1000 uncoupled differential equations.
8
Perturbations
Force function
Perturbation function
9
Relativistic Equation of Motion
10
Numerical integration
Minor changes in orbital elements during a 50
year integration Short-period perturbations Need
for osculating or mean elements
11
Numerical integration
104 yr integration Changes in e, ?, ?
substantial
12
Numerical integration
105 yr integration
Long-periodic perturbation
Secular perturbations ? 15000 yr ? 27000 yr
13
Tsiganis et al. (2005)
  • Eccentricities of Jupiter (0.06), Saturn (0.09)
    and Uranus (0.08) and a 2º difference in
    inclination difficult to explain
  • Nice model Gas giants form within 18 AU from
    Sun, surrounded by a 30-50 Earth-mass disk
  • Migration due to interaction with disk (angular
    momentum conservation) leads to present
    semi-major axes J,S,U,N5.2, 9.5, 19.2, 30.1
    and eccentricities
  • Jupiter and Saturn briefly in 12 resonance

14
Tsiganis et al. (2005)
Bild Figur 1, Tsiganis et al (2005)
33 of runs resulted in ice giant ejection, the
rest in (satellite-conserving) close encounters
15
Gomes et al. (2005)
  • Late Heavy Bombardment 700 million years after
    Solar System formation
  • Moon struck by 61018 kg material, forming the
    lunar basins (Maria)
  • Various simulations with different initial
    interplanetary distances, disk cut-offs, disk
    mass etc ? 12 resonance reached 0.2-1.1 Gyr
    into the simulation
  • Severe depletion of disk, sending large numbers
    of comets towards terrestrial planets

16
Gomes et al. (2005)
t100 Myr
t879 Myr
Bild Figur 2, Gomes et al. (2005)
t1082 Myr (3 of disk is left)
t882 Myr
17
Gomes et al. (2005)
  • About right amount of mass hits moon
  • 50 arrives in first 3.7 Myr, and 90 in first 29
    Myr
  • Earth hit by 1.81020 kg comets. Water content
    6 of current ocean mass
  • Asteroid belt depleted by factor 10, many
    impacting terrestrial planets within 150 Myr
    after 12 resonance

18
Levison Duncan (1997)
  • Empirical data Physical theory Numerical
    simulations Comparative analysis ? Extraction
    of Knowledge

Initial conditions 1300 test particles, 0.01?e?0.
03 ilt1º, 4 Gyr simulation Neptune-encountering p
articles with e0.05 and ilt15º selected. 2200
clones
Bild Figur 1, Levison Duncan (1997)
19
Levison Duncan (1997)
  • Sun and four giant planets
  • 1 Gyr simulation time
  • Removal of egt1 objects
  • Removal of agt1000 AU objects
  • Removal of object colliding with Sun/planet
  • Visible if qlt2.5 AU

20
Orbit element distribution
JFC 2lt T lt 3 HTC T lt 2
Bild Figur 2, Levison Duncan (1997)
Edgeworth-Kuiper belt (EKB) likely source of JFCs
but unlikely source of HTCs Why few real
simulated objects with T 2?
21
Evolutionary path
Bild Figur 3a, Levison Duncan (1997)
  • a39.4 AU, e0.25 ? TN2.86, qgt17.7 AU (handover
    to Uranus)
  • TU2.86, qgt9.0 AU (handover to Saturn)
  • TS2.94, qgt3.8 AU (handover to Jupiter)
  • TJ2.82
  • Handover requires T just below 3!

22
Statistics
  • 31 become visible comets (all but two JFC)
  • These later become ejected (97) or impact
  • 69 never within 2.5 AU.
  • Of non-visible objects
  • 25 ejected (egt1)
  • 68 removed (agt1000 AU)
  • 2 impact Sun/planet
  • 5 survives simulation in EKB

23
Impact rates
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com