MQMS: Diabetes, 19922001 - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 16
About This Presentation
Title:

MQMS: Diabetes, 19922001

Description:

1992-2001. Sylvia Kuo, Ph.D. (MPR) Barbara Fleming, M.D., Ph.D. (VA) ... Angela Merrill, PhD (MPR) June 2004. Importance of Monitoring. Diabetes in Medicare ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:28
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 17
Provided by: AHS66
Category:
Tags: mqms | diabetes | mpr

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: MQMS: Diabetes, 19922001


1
MQMS Diabetes, 1992-2001
  • Sylvia Kuo, Ph.D. (MPR)
  • Barbara Fleming, M.D., Ph.D. (VA)
  • Neil Gittings, M.A. (CMS)
  • Lein Han, Ph.D. (CMS)
  • Linda Geiss, M.A. (CDC)
  • Michael Engelgau, M.D., M.S. (CDC)
  • Sheila Roman, M.D., M.P.H. (CMS)
  • Presented by
  • Angela Merrill, PhD (MPR)
  • June 2004

2
Importance of Monitoring Diabetes in Medicare
  • Rising economic cost and prevalence of diabetes
  • 98 billion in 1997 to 132 billion in 2002
  • Diabetes can lead to severe and costly outcomes
  • Healthy People 2010 has targets specific to
    diabetes
  • Disproportionate cost of diabetes borne by
    Medicare

3
Study Questions
  • How has quality of diabetes care in Medicare
    changed over time?
  • Is there evidence of subgroup disparities?
  • What areas of concern might there be for
    policymakers?

4
Data
  • Annual cross-sections from 1992-2001
  • 5 Standard Analytic Files
  • Inclusion criteria
  • Full year Medicare FFS participant
  • Principal or secondary diagnosis of diabetes on
    at least 1 hospitalization/ED visit OR 2
    ambulatory encounters
  • Exclude if gestational diabetes or ESRD

5
Process and Outcome Measures
  • Preventive care practices
  • HbA1c test
  • Lipid profiling
  • Eye exam
  • Self-monitoring of glucose
  • Short-term acute complications
  • Hospitalization for ketoacidosis
  • ED visit for metabolic crisis
  • Long-term complications
  • Nephropathy
  • Lower limb amputation
  • Blindness retinopathy
  • Hospitalization for AMI, heart failure, stroke

6
National Trends in Preventive Service Receipt,
1992-2001
Per 100 Medicare Beneficiaries with Diabetes
95 confidence intervals within /- 0.37 per 100
for all measures and years.
7
National Trends in Short-term Complications,
1992-2001
Per 1,000 Medicare Beneficiaries with Diabetes
95 confidence intervals within /- 0.55 per
1,000 for all measures and years.
8
National Trends in Long-term Complications,
1992-2001
Per 1,000 Medicare Beneficiaries with Diabetes
95 confidence intervals within /- 0.62 per
1,000 for all measures and years.
9
National Trends in Long-term Complications,
1992-2001
Per 1,000 Medicare Beneficiaries with Diabetes
95 confidence intervals within /- 0.62 per
1,000 for all measures and years.
10
National Trends in Long-term Complications,
1992-2001
Per 1,000 Medicare Beneficiaries with Diabetes
95 confidence intervals within /- 1.12 per
1,000 for all measures and years.
11
Disparities Among Patient Subgroups
  • Some subgroups have
  • Lower preventive service rates
  • Higher complication rates
  • These subgroups are
  • Non-whites (vs. whites)
  • Dual eligibles (vs. non-dually eligible)
  • Oldest of the old 85
  • Under 65

12
Example Disparities in Preventive Service Rates
by Race
Difference between subgroup and all other
subgroups statistically significant at the 5
level.
13
Comparison with Healthy People 2010 Goals
14
Summary
  • Improvements
  • ? preventive care practices
  • ? short-term complications
  • ? amputations, cardiovascular conditions
  • Challenges
  • ? nephropathy, eye complications
  • Disparities in care for nonwhite, dual eligible,
    lt65, 85
  • Progress towards Healthy People 2010 goals

15
Limitations
  • Subject to changes in billing and coding
    practices
  • Underestimate overall prevalence
  • May reflect improved detection of complications,
    not increasing prevalence

16
Implications for Policy and Clinical Practice
  • MQMS identifies areas of improvements in diabetes
    quality of care
  • Identifies where opportunities remain
  • Stimulates research on disparities for vulnerable
    populations
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com