Title: Evidencebased nursing implementation and utilisation
1Evidence-based nursing - implementation and
utilisation
Hilary Jacobsen 2005
2Teaching Aims
- To understand the nature of evidence-based
nursing - To have knowledge about evidence-based nursing
resources - To have knowledge of barriers to the utilisation
of evidence-based nursing - To have knowledge of a method for implementing
evidence-based nursing
3Definition Evidence- based nursing practice
- The conscientious, explicit and judicious use of
theory derived, research-based information in
making decisions about care delivery to
individuals or groups of patients and in
consideration of individual needs and
preferences. - Ingersol, Gail L. Nursing Outlook, 2000 484,
152
4Evidence-based nursing resources
- Evidenced-based journals
- Systematic reviews
- Report series
- Centres for Evidence-based nursing
- Evidence-based practice guidelines
5Knowledge utilisation in practice.
- Instrumental utilisation
- Conceptual utilisation
- Personal competence
- Evaluation competence
- Utilisation competence
6Barriers preventing the use of evidence-based
nursing
- Insufficient authority
- Insufficient time
- Unfamiliar with relevant research
- Doctors will not co-operate
- Lack of support
- Difficulty in understanding research results
7A model for evidence utilisationadapted from
Tove Aminda Hanssen 2001. Rubin et.al in 1998
- Step 1 Ask a question from clinical practice
- Step 2 Look for the best knowledge
- Step 3 Evaluate the relevance, validity and
evidence level of the knowledge - Step 4 Utilisation of the best available
knowledge in decisions about patient care
8Step 1 Ask a question from clinical practice
- Features of a good question
- Which people or situations are involved
- Which interventions we are interested in
- Which results or effects are of interest (Hanssen
2001)
9Central questions in health care(Bjørndal in
Hanssen 2001)
- Why some people become ill whilst others remain
well (this is related to the cause) - How we can determine if someone is ill (this is
related to diagnosing illness) - What we can do for the ill person (this is
related to prevention, treatment, care and
rehabilitation) - How the illness can develop (this is related to
the prognosis) - How illness is experienced (this is connected to
the patients experience)
10Step 2 Look for the best knowledge
11Step 3 Evaluate the knowledges relevance,
validity and evidence level
- reliability - how many studies of the phenomenon
have been carried out, is the method used
suitable with regards the research question, how
big was the sample, how was the data collected,
when was the research carried out - whether the results can be transferred to the
specific practice situation in question, is the
context so similar that this is possible - does the evidence have sufficient weight to be
trustworthy, do the advantages outweigh the
disadvantages/costs, are the values of the
patients in questions taken into account?
12Level of evidence(from Jennings 2001, adapted
after Stetler et.al. 1998)
- I Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
- II Individual experimental study
- III Quasi-experimental study
- IV Non-experimental study (f.ex. descriptive,
qualitative, case studies) - V Systematically obtained, verifiable quality
improvement program evaluation or case report
data - VI Opinions of nationally known authorities based
on their experience or the opinions of an expert
committee, including the interpretation of
non-research-based information regulatory or
legal opinions
13Weight of the evidence(from Hanssen 2001)
- A At least one randomized controlled trial (level
I II) - B Good clinical studies (level III IV)
- C Expert committee or authoritative opinions
(level V VI) when good clinical studies are not
available.
14Step 4 Utilisation of the best available
knowledge in decisions about patient care.
- Develop a concrete proposal for changing practice
- Set objectives
- Identify barriers to change
- Link interventions to obstacles
- Develop and implement the plan
- Evaluate the result
15Literature