Approach to Experimental Design and Analysis: Propagation of Errors and Uncertainties ERR_PROP'ppt - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 25
About This Presentation
Title:

Approach to Experimental Design and Analysis: Propagation of Errors and Uncertainties ERR_PROP'ppt

Description:

Key concept: errors & uncertainties are inevitable in measurements due to both ... Hot, 1 kg/s. In, 95 C. Out, 75 C. Cold, 2 kg/s. In, 20 C. Out, 28 C. Questions ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:80
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 26
Provided by: chemEng4
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Approach to Experimental Design and Analysis: Propagation of Errors and Uncertainties ERR_PROP'ppt


1
Approach to Experimental Design and Analysis
Propagation of Errors and UncertaintiesERR_PROP
.ppt
2
Contents
  • Key concept errors uncertainties are
    inevitable in measurements due to both
    fluctuations in readings basic instrument
    readings they propagate through to final results
  • Example mass balance involving addition,
    subtraction, multiplication, division.
  • Problem for us to do right now.

3
Treatment of Experimental Data
  • (read together with the document VARIANCE.doc)
  • Primary treatment
  • errors and uncertainties associated with
    measurements
  • how these errors combine
  • Secondary treatment
  • analysis of variance
  • ANOVA discussed in ANOVA.ppt

4
Primary Treatment
  • can be done with any/all data
  • systematic and random errors (uncertainties)
  • few measurements are used on their own need to
    analyse combinations of these errors

5
Kinds of Errors and Uncertainties
  • Systematic errors
  • calibration errors check by standard tests
  • e.g. water boils at 100oC temperature
    measurement device should read 100oC

6
Kinds of Errors and Uncertainties (cont.)
  • Random errors
  • from unpredictable (but not unquantifiable)
    fluctuations in experimental situation
  • sometimes called uncertainty

7
Propagation of Errors and Uncertainties
EXAMPLE
  • Cooling Tower
  • Suppose that you have done one experiment with
    the Departments cooling tower equipment, giving
    the following results-

8
Equipment
Outlet air humidity, 0.0088 kg water / kg dry air
Make-up water, 1.8 x 10-6 kg/s
Inlet air flowrate, 0.018 kg total/s
Inlet air humidity, 0.0080 kg water / kg dry air
9
Important Question to Answer
  • Do these results show that the water make-up
    flowrate is within experimental uncertainties of
    being equal to the moisture leaving the column in
    the air?
  • This question is important because the mass
    balance tells you and the reader of your report
    how reliable your results are.

10
Another View
  • When you say that your discrepancy is small,
    how small is small? Small means different things
    to different people.
  • Here, small means small relative to the
    probable/possible discrepancy resulting from all
    the uncertainties in all the measurements.
  • To work out the overall discrepancy, we need to
    propagate through all the individual
    uncertainties into the uncertainty in the final
    result.
  • This is what we are doing here.

11
Addition/Subtraction Use Absolute Errors
12
Multiplication/Division Use Relative Errors
13
Fundamentals
  • ?A ?B are maxima of
  • uncertainty in reading instrument (half of
    minimum scale division or half of instrument
    resolution)
  • uncertainty due to fluctuations in readings.
  • ?A ?B are like standard deviations cannot be
    added directly.
  • (?A)2 (?B)2 are like variances these can be
    added.

14
Answer Step 1 Calculate Dry Gas Flowrate (F)
  • Required because humidity is expressed on a dry
    basis we have measured total dry flowrate and
    humidity at the inlet
  • F FW /(1 Yi)
  • (0.018 0.004) kg total s-1 /
  • (1 0.0080 0.0001) kg total / kg dry gas
  • 0.0179 kg dry gas s-1
  • 0.018 kg dry gas s-1

15
  • Most of the uncertainty is contributed by the gas
    flowrate.

16
Step 2 Calculate Rate of Moisture Loss from
Tower in Air
  • Rate of loss
  • F (Yo - Yi)
  • (0.018 0.004) kg dry gas s-1 x
  • (0.0088 0.0001 - 0.0080 0.0001) kg water /
    kg dry gas
  • (0.018 0.004) kg dry gas s-1 x
  • (0.0008 0.00014 ) kg water / kg dry gas
  • (1.4 0.4) x 10-5 kg water s-1

17
  • Most of this uncertainty (78 of it) comes from
    the gas flowrate

18
Step 3 Compare
  • Compare rate of moisture loss from tower in air
    with water make-up flowrate.
  • Rate of loss - make-up flowrate
  • (1.4 0.4) x 10-5 kg water s-1
  • - (1.8 0.2) x 10-5 kg water s-1
  • (-0.4 0.5) x 10-5 kg water s-1

19
Significance
  • Uncertainty in the discrepancy is greater than
    discrepancy itself, so the discrepancy could
    possibly be zero within the uncertainties in the
    measurements.
  • If uncertainty in the discrepancy was smaller
    than the discrepancy, then some other cause
    (apart from random measurement uncertainty) would
    need to be sought for the discrepancy.

20
So?
  • In the lab, you must not only measure the actual
    values (e.g. a temperature of 55oC), but also
    estimate the uncertainty (e.g. ?2oC).
  • You must then use these estimates of uncertainty
    in your propagation of error analysis.

21
How to Estimate Uncertainties?
  • How much does a measurement fluctuate?
  • What is the smallest scale division?
  • Uncertainty maximum value of (measurement
    fluctuation, half smallest scale division).
  • Uncertainty previous literature experience.

22
Exercise
  • In the spiral heat exchanger lab, you measure a
    hot water flowrate of 1 kg s-1 a cold water
    flowrate of 2 kg s-1.
  • Literature experience suggests that the
    uncertainty in these flowrates is 5.
  • Hot water inlet, outlet Ts 95oC, 75oC.
  • Cold water inlet, outlet Ts 20oC, 28oC.
  • Uncertainties in Ts 1oC.
  • Cp (water) 4.2 kJ kg-1 K-1. No uncertainty.

23
Equipment
In, 20 C
Cold, 2 kg/s
In, 95 C
Hot, 1 kg/s
Out, 75 C
Out, 28 C
24
Questions
  • What is the heat balance?
  • Do we have a small discrepancy in this heat
    balance?

25
Conclusions
  • Errors uncertainties are inevitable in
    measurements due to both fluctuations in readings
    basic instrument readings.
  • They propagate through to final results in both
    mass energy balances (e.g. heat-transfer
    coefficients) Not just for mass energy
    balances.
  • Addition, subtraction, multiplication, division.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com