A Case Study: - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 22
About This Presentation
Title:

A Case Study:

Description:

Operated by the Walkerton, Ontario, CA PUC. Stan Koebel-general manager, brother Frank was the foreman ... Heavy rains, totaling more than 5 inches. Heaviest ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:28
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 23
Provided by: RCAC
Category:
Tags: case | foreman | study

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: A Case Study:


1
A Case Study
  • THE WALKERTON TRAGEDY

2
You SnoozeYou Lose!!
3
Walkerton Public Water System
  • Operated by the Walkerton, Ontario, CA PUC
  • Stan Koebel-general manager, brother Frank was
    the foreman
  • 3 groundwater sources with chlorine treatment

4
Events..May 8-15, 2000
  • Heavy rains, totaling more than 5 inches
  • Heaviest almost 3 inches
  • Well 5 was the primary source of water
  • May 13,14,15 - Frank Koebel performed daily
    rounds
  • Standard practice of not checking chlorine
  • Fictitious log entries

5
Events.. May 15
  • Stan Koebel returns after one week away
  • turns Well 7 on without chlorination
  • a new chlorinator had been installed
  • 3 bact samples taken by PUC employee
  • labels did not show sample location
  • from PUC workshop?

6
Events..May 15 - 17
  • May 15 - 4 samples taken
  • one from the distribution system
  • 3 from a water main construction site
  • May 16- all samples are received by the lab
  • May 17- lab advises Stan Koebel
  • 3 samples from the construction site are positive
    for total and fecal coliforms (E. coli)
  • other sample suspect
  • 6 days to notify health authorities

7
Events..May 18 - 19
  • First indications of widespread illness
  • members of the public contact the PUC
  • Stan Koebel assures them the water is safe to
    drink
  • More illness, bloody diarrhea, vomiting
  • Doctor contacts Health Unit suspecting E. coli.
  • Health authorities begin an investigation

8
Events..May 19
  • Stan informs the Health Unit that he thinks the
    water is OK
  • does not mention positive samples or that Well 7
    had been operating without chlorination
  • If health authorities were aware of test results
    and Well 7.with no chlorination..
  • Boil Water Notice!!!!

9
Events..May 19 20
  • Stan begins flushing and super chlorinating
  • the residual is elevated in the system and at the
    wellheads a few days later
  • Stool sample from a child tests E.coli positive
  • outbreak is expanding rapidly
  • Stan informs health authorities of the system
    residuals
  • false impression created

10
Events..May 21
  • E.coli is confirmed
  • Health authorities issue boil order over AM/FM
    radio
  • Doctor contacts Mayor requesting further public
    notification-no further steps taken

11
Events..May 21 22
  • Walkerton experiences its first death
  • Health authorities take 20 water samples
  • Hospital receives 270 calls for serious abdominal
    pain diarrhea
  • Child is airlifted to London, Ontario for
    emergency treatment.
  • Stan provides for the first time the May 17 test
    results
  • Directs Frank to change the Well 7 log to imply
    that it had operated with a chlorinator, and
    provides altered logs to health authorities

12
The Fallout..
  • 7 people die
  • 2,300 people became ill
  • Many suffer permanent organ damage
  • It was all preventable!

13
A Community Devastated Loss of Confidence in
Services
  • Suffering friends and family of lost ones
  • Uncertainty about the future will it happen
    again?

14
What Went Wrong?? What Could Have Been Done To
Address This?
15
What Went Wrong?? What Could Have Been Done To
Address This?
  • Chlorine residual turbidity monitoring daily at
    Well 5.
  • Operator training
  • Inadequate chlorine dosages
  • Inadequate monitoring
  • False chlorine residual log entries
  • Poorly documented bacti sampling locations
  • Intentional violation of regulations
  • PUC Board members not well informed and may have
    delegated their responsibilities

16
What Went Wrong?? What Could Have Been Done To
Prevent This??
  • Health authorities needed to be more aggressive
  • Lab should notify health authorities of lab
    results directly
  • Boil Water Notice should have been more broadly
    disseminated
  • Stan misrepresented and concealed information
  • Test results
  • Chlorinator not operating

17
Anatomy of the Physical Causes
  • The Well
  • Shallow
  • Casing extended 15 feet
  • Water table 8 40 feet
  • Nearby surface water influence
  • Fractured rock
  • Pathogenic bacteria quickly moved from the land
    surface to the ground water supply

18
Anatomy of the Physical Causes
  • The Farm
  • Manure spreading, farm owner not faulted
  • The owner of the farm was using best management
    and widely accepted practices

19
Lessons Learned
  • Who is ultimately responsible for the health of
    your customers?
  • What are the weak links in your operations?
  • Does anyone in your utility approach their job
    like the Koebels?
  • In the event of an emergency do you have a plan
    (ERP) in place? Do you know what to do?
  • Could this happen in your community?

20
Stan The Man
21
(No Transcript)
22
Walkerton Not An Isolated Case
  • Milwaukee, Wisconsin
  • Cabool, Missouri
  • New York State Fairgrounds
  • Centers For Disease Control Reporting Waterborne
    Disease Incidents and Investigations
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com