Thank You for turning off cell phones - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 51
About This Presentation
Title:

Thank You for turning off cell phones

Description:

Think of evaluation as asking questions for the purpose of learning about our ... Ferrer, M. Jacob, S., Ferraru, T.M. (2001, Oct.) Two (or more) heads are better ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:34
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 52
Provided by: david358
Category:
Tags: cell | ferrer | phones | thank | turning

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Thank You for turning off cell phones


1
Thank You for turning off cell phones
  • gt Its good for us!

2
Excelling at Practical Program Evaluation
  • gt And loving it!

Joseph L. Donaldson Extension Specialist
3
Today we will
  • Improve evaluation techniques
  • Match response scales to outcomes
  • Use two tools for post-then-pre-test
  • Explore an online survey builder approach

4
What is evaluation?
  • Think of evaluation as asking questions for the
    purpose of learning about our program so we can
    continually improve and communicate program
    outcomes to our clients and stakeholders.

5
What should I evaluate?
  • Planned
  • Most contact hours since thats where we have the
    most impact
  • Likely to be offered again
  • Measurable outcomes
  • Important to your stakeholders

6
Evaluation Plans
  • Watch them Observation
  • Examine what they did or said Records
  • Ask them Interviews or questionnaires

7
Improve Evaluation Techniques
  • Observation
  • Records
  • Interviews and Questionnaires

8
Observation
  • What are you aiming for?
  • Have criteria written down
  • Checklist is an observation

9
EXAMPLE Checklist for Prevention of Cross
Contamination Between Meats and Ready to Eat
Foods
? Uses separately labeled or color-coded cutting
boards ? Changes disposable gloves between
tasks ? Washes hands before and after, when
working with raw foods ? Cleans and sanitizes
food contact surfaces that touch contaminated
food before they come in contact with cooked or
ready to eat food ? Stores raw or contaminated
food below cooked or ready to eat foods to
prevent them from touching or dripping fluids
10
EXAMPLE Checklist for Clean Healthy Homes
  • Of the 10 program participants, I have observed
    the following making changes
  • ___ Number who now dust at least weekly.
  • ___ Number who vacuum at least weekly.
  • ___ Number who dispose of trash properly.
  • ___ Number who change air filters monthly.

11
Examine Records
  • Benchmarks
  • But, records are often not available
  • So, make your own
  • Record/diary/checklist

12
Focus Group Interviews
  • 5-7 people
  • Ask them what happened as a result of the program
  • Ask follow-up questions
  • Record the answers
  • Data can be hard to analyze, but its rich

13
Surveys
  • Match question to scale
  • Dont have bunches of scales and different
    questions
  • As simple as possible
  • Stick to what you have to know

14
Response Scales
  • Another name is answer categories
  • Match the responses to what you are measuring
    (outcomes)
  • Measuring behavior or practice change
  • Measuring attitudes or opinions
  • Measuring skill improvements

15
Measuring Behavior or Practice Change
  • 0Never
  • 1-2 Once or Twice
  • 3-5 3-5 times
  • 6 6 or More Times

16
Aspirations
  • Do you expect to
  • As a result of this program
  • Definitely No
  • Probably No
  • Probably Yes
  • Definitely Yes

17
Attitudes/Opinions
  • Strongly Oppose
  • Oppose
  • Neutral
  • Favorable
  • Strongly Favorable

18
How do you feel about a ban on smoking in all
restaurants?
  • 50 __ 1. Strongly Oppose
  • 0 __ 2. Oppose
  • 0 __ 3. Neutral
  • 0 __ 4. Favorable
  • 50 __ 5. Extremely Favorable
  • Mean 3.0 Neutral

19
How do you feel about a ban on smoking in all
restaurants?
  • 30 ___ 1. Strongly Oppose
  • 20 ___ 2. Oppose
  • 0 ___ 3. Neutral
  • 20 ___ 4. Favorable
  • 30 ___ 5. Extremely Favorable
  • Mean 3.0 Neutral

20
How do we report means?
  • Five part knowledge scale
  • Pre-test mean of 3.5 Post-test of 4.5
  • 4.5 minus 3.5 1
  • 5 divided by 1 20
  • Report that there was a 20 gain in knowledge

21
Pre-Test and Post-Test
  • No need to say pre-test or post-test to your
    participants
  • Its time to begin. First, you will complete a
    very short exercise that will help you prepare
    for our program.
  • The last part of our workshop will allow you to
    review what we did today.

22
Post-Then-Pre Common Example
Please think about your healthy indoor air
practices now and before this program. Please
check which, if any practices you do now (left)
and then check which, if any, practices you were
doing before this program (right).
NOW BEFORE THIS PROGRAM ____ 1. I use a
plastic mattress cover. ____ ____ 2. I dust
weekly. ____ ____ 3. I change air filters
monthly. ____ ____ 4. I open a bathroom window
to reduce moisture. ____ ____ 5. I vacuum
weekly. ____
23
How important is indoor air quality to you?
  • Some people feel that indoor air quality is no
    big deal. Others are concerned. What is true for
    you? Please place a B on one step to show how
    important you thought indoor air quality was
    before our series. Please place an N on the
    step that shows how important you think indoor
    air quality is now.

Very Important
Not Important
24
Tally Results
  • N 88
  • Four step increase 50 people
  • Three step increase 18 people
  • Two step increase 10 people
  • One step increase 9 people
  • Same or Decrease 1 person

25
Changing Attitudes for Better Health
  • UT Extension participants reported that they
    changed attitudes about the importance of indoor
    air quality for better health! 88 participants
    completed an attitude scale that described how
    important they felt indoor air quality was for
    better health. The scale measured their feeling
    both before and after the program, and the scale
    ranged from no change to a four level change.
    After the four-month program, 98 reported that
    they now view air quality as more important for
    their total health.
  • The majority of participants (50 people 56)
    increased four levels on the air quality attitude
    scale.

26
Using Results of Open-Ended Questions
  • Turn outcome into a question
  • Obtain answers
  • Later, write down answer categories
  • Now list the participants answers
  • Put answers in categories

27
Turn your outcome
  • Participants will
  • Understand rule 1018,
  • Understand rule 406, and
  • Understand health effects of lead exposure.

28
into a Question
  • Did you learn anything new about lead poisoning
    prevention?
  • Yes, No, Dont Know
  • If yes, what did you learn?

29
Write down answer categories
  • The Outcomes
  • Understand rule 1018,
  • Understand rule 406, and
  • Understand health effects of lead exposure

30
List the participants answers
  • Rules for realtors (406)
  • No answer
  • Lead exposure slows learning ability (health
    effects)
  • How lead exposure affects brain development
    (health effects)

31
Figure Percentages
  • Health Effects 20 of 50 40
  • Rule 1018 10 of 50 20
  • Rule 406 10 of 50 20
  • No answer 5 of 50 10
  • All other 5 of 50 10

32
Measuring Barriers to Change Example A
  • Not interested in ___________________
  • Program did not motivate me to get started
  • Have not had enough time to get started
  • No money to get started
  • Found the directions totally confusing
  • Dont do things like that
  • Dont believe what I learned
  • Other reason (please list___________)

33
Measuring Barriers to Change Example B
  • In your opinion, why do more people not take
    their used oil and antifreeze to a service
    station or recycling center?
  • What could be done here in _______
  • County to make it easier for people to take
    their used oil and antifreeze to a service
    station or recycling center?

34
Assessment
  • Considerations
  • True/False
  • Multiple Choice
  • Short Answer, etc.

35
True/False
  • Fast and easy
  • Appropriate if objectives are identify, select,
    or recognize
  • 50 is a weakness
  • All, always, never, none and only - tend to be in
    false statements
  • For clarity, avoid large, long time, regularly,
    some and usually

36
Short Answer/Completion
  • Appropriate if objectives recall, remember,
    label, list, select, define
  • Only one blank per question
  • If answer is a number, indicate the unit of
    measure inches, gallons, , etc.
  • Blanks near end of the sentence and same length
  • Answers should be key terms

37
Multiple Choice
  • Objectives recognize, distinguish between,
    select, estimate, infer, predict, relate,
    categorize
  • Less likely to obtain the correct answer by
    guessing
  • Reading level and reading speed

38
Typical MC Questions
  • Which would be another name for
  • Which is an example of
  • What would happen if
  • What is the best (worst, most important, least
    important)
  • Which of the following would have the greatest
  • Which of the following best describes

39
Format
  • 1. What is the best-selling potted plant in
    Tennessee every December?
  • A. Amaryllis
  • B. Chrysanthemum
  • C. Kalanchoe
  • D. Poinsettia

40
Per Question
  • True/False 15-30 seconds
  • Multiple Choice (brief)
  • 30-60 seconds
  • Multiple Choice 60-90 seconds
  • Short Answer 30-60 seconds
  • Matching five items to 6 responses 2-4 minutes

41
Evaluation Tool
  • Tennessee 4-H Life Skills Evaluation System
    (LSES)
  • Go to
  • http//www.utextension.utk.edu/4H/lifeSkills/eval/
    demo/

42
LSES is a database
  • Website
  • Agents select from valid, reliable surveys
  • Enter results online
  • Instant, aggregated data
  • Measure life skills gained by youth through 4-H
    programs

43
(No Transcript)
44
(No Transcript)
45
Create/Print Survey
Print This Survey
46
Enter Data
15 10 25 60 50
47
View Survey Results
10 10 10 10 60
5 5 25 25 40
10 20 20 10 40
0 0 0 0 100
0 0 10 10 80
Mean for the instrument 4.2
48
Thank You!
49
References
  • Barkman, S.J. (2002). A field guide to designing
    quantitative instruments to measure program
    impact. West Lafayette, IN Purdue Extension.
  • Bennett, C. Rockwell. K. (1995). Targeting
    outcomes of programs (TOP) An integrated
    approach to planning and evaluation. Retrieved
    August 29, 2003, from University of Nebraska TOP
    Web site http//citnews.unl.edu/TOP/english/index
    .html.
  • Boser, J. (2004). Curriculum, research and
    evaluation 560 Student assessment. Unpublished
    course materials. University of Tennessee.
  • Diem, K.G. (2002, Dec.) Using research methods to
    evaluate your extension program. Journal of
    Extension, 40(6). Retrieved from
    http///www.joe.org/joe/2003december/a1.shtml.
  • Diem, K.G. (2003, Feb.) Program development in a
    political world its all about impact. Journal
    of Extension, 41(1). Retrieved from
    http//www.joe.org/joe/2003february/a6.shtml.

50
References
  • Ferrer, M. Jacob, S., Ferraru, T.M. (2001, Oct.)
    Two (or more) heads are better than one An
    application of group process to developing
    extension evaluation tools. Journal of Extension,
    39(5). Retrieved from http//www.joe.org/joe/2001
    october/a2.html
  • Kiernan, N.E. (2001). Measuring barriers to
    change Tipsheet 27. University Park, PA Penn
    satte Cooperative Extension. Available
    http//www.extension.psu.edu/evaluation/tipsheets/
    measuring barrierstochange.pdf. Kiernan, N.E.
    (2001). How many answer categories are correct?
    Tipsheet 38. University Park, PA Penn State
    Cooperative Extension. Available at
    http//www.extension.psu.edu/evaluation/tipsheets/
    howmanyanswercategoriesarecorrect.pdf.
  • Kiernan, N.E. (2002). Calculating and displaying
    findings from a stepscale Tipsheet 47
    University Park, PA Penn State Cooperative
    Extension. Available at http//www.extension.psu.
    edu/evaluation/tipsheets/calculatinganddisplayingf
    indingsfromstepscale.pdf

51
References
  • Kiernan, N.E. (2002). How to use evaluation data
    to write different types of impact statements
    Tipsheet 66. University Park, PA Penn State
    Cooperative Extension. Available at
    http//www.extension.psu.edu/evaluation/tipsheets/
    howtouseevaluationdatatowritedifferenttypesofimpac
    tstatements.pdf
  • Taylor-Powell, E. (2002). Program development in
    UW-Extension. Retrieved August 28, 2003, from
    University of Wisconsin-Extension-Cooperative
    Extension, Program Development and Evaluation
    Unit Web site http//www1.uwex.edu/ces/pubs/pdf
    /G3658_1.PDF
  • UW-Extension. (n.d.) Program development in
    UW-Extension Getting started in Extension
    programming. University of Wisconsin Distance
    Education/Digital Media Unit.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com