Title: Beams%20for%20European
1Beams for European Neutrino Experiments
(BENE) subtitle A Network aiming at a
consensual road map for accelerator based
neutrino programs in Europe
International Scoping Study of a future Neutrino
Factory and Superbeam facility (ISS)
FP7 Design Study of next European Accelerator
Neutrino Facility Euro? in world wide
collaboration IDS
A complex multi-parameter problem
2Beams for European Neutrino Experiments
(BENE) subtitle A Network aiming at a
consensual road map for accelerator based
neutrino programs in Europe
International Design Studies of future Neutrino
facilities (IDS)
FP7RD program(s) of next European Accelerator
Neutrino Facility Euro? in world wide
collaboration IDS
A complex multi-parameter problem
32002 2003 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012
Accelerator RD Accelerator RD Accelerator RD Accelerator RD Accelerator RD Accelerator RD Accelerator RD Accelerator RD Accelerator RD Accelerator RD Accelerator RD Accelerator RD Accelerator RD
CARE Multipurpose (e,p,n) Multipurpose (e,p,n) Multipurpose (e,p,n) Multipurpose (e,p,n) Multipurpose (e,p,n) Multipurpose (e,p,n) ? ? ? ?
CARE SRF SRF SRF SRF SRF
CARE PHIN PHIN PHIN PHIN PHIN
CARE HIPPI HIPPI HIPPI
CARE NED
EUROTEV DS ILCCLIC DS ILCCLIC DS ILCCLIC ? ? ? ? ?
EURISOL DS Neutrino b-beam DS Neutrino b-beam DS Neutrino b-beam DS Neutrino b-beam ? ? ? ?
DS nFact Scoping study Scoping study ? DS n ? DS n Fact ? ?
EUROLEAP e in plasma? e in plasma? e in plasma?
Major Strategic decisions
4The matrix of neutrino transition probability
Pee1- ..
Pem
Pet
Pmm1- ..
Pme
P mt
Ptt1- ..
Pte .
Ptm ..
5Charting the matrix of neutrino transition
probability
Solar (SuperK,SNO) LBL Reactors (Kamland)
Pee1- ..
- Pem - 4 Re Jem12sin2D12
- - 4 Re Jem13sin2D13
- - 4 Re Jem23sin2D23
- 8J sinD12sinD23sinD13
- Pet - 4 Re Jet12sin2D12
- - 4 Re Jet13sin2D13
- - 4 Re Jet23sin2D23
- 8J sinD12sinD23sinD13
atmo
?e? ?µ crucial
Pmm1- ..
- P mt - 4 Re Jm t12sin2D12
- - 4 Re Jm t13sin2D13
- - 4 Re Jm t23sin2D23
- 8J sinD12sinD23sinD13
Atmo K2K, NuMI, CNGS
T CP violating term e-id
universal
Ptt1- ..
Pte .
Ptm ..
.. experiments ahead of us, for decades .. a
global endeavour
6Three years of BENE in a nutshell
CARE-Report-04-034-BENE.doc CARE-Report-05-021-BEN
E.doc
- 2004 BENE established on the EU scene
- MMW workshop May 2004 the MMW frontier
Villars SPSC meeting Sep 04, where we cashed - renewed attention to a Eu ? program
(RD) - emergence of a ? construction window
!!!!!!!!!!! - Betabeam DS approved !
- 2005 BENE consolidated on the EU international
scene - NNN05 in April and NuFact05 in June
- physics case further established in the two
workshops - RD advancing HARPMUSCAT data out, MERITMICE
approved, -
- making the ? case
- in the
strategic discussion ahead -
ISS launched, aiming resolutely to DS Proposal
7- 2006 BENE proved a driving force
- of the International
Scoping Study - with USJapanIndia
and more - published in Jan-May a
comprehensive -
Midterm Scientific Report -
CERN Yellow 2006-005 22 May 2006 -
- scored in July a
formal CERN Council recognition of -
its physics case -
its RD recommendations - is now diving into an
intense period of - preparation of FP7
proposals - Design Study
already in April 07 - will do so in its
natural international context - the
International Design Stud(ies)
8BENE the longer term plan
2005 06 07 08 09 10
11 19
Construction window
Int. Scoping Study()
Feasibility, NFSB
Design Study
Physics
Feasibility TPW
CDR at the time of end of LHC payment first
LHC results ILC decision be ready to catch any
construction window
HIPPI, HARP
MERIT
MICE
PRISM, EMMA
NB Betabeam CDR0 End 2009 !
9Milestones Deliverables BENE III period Jan 06
- Jun07
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Nov Dec Jan Fe
b Mar Apr May Jun
BENESG gt 1/ month
LOIs
LOIs
NNN06, Seattle
NBI, CERN
Open SG, CERN
ISS/IDS, 19-21
10NuFact06NuFact high energy stategy.1 Mton
magnetic detector few 1000 Km
USNF ...... UKNF ..
NNN06Betabeam/SuperBeam low energy
strategy0.5-1.0 Megaton Water(HyperK, UNO,
Memphys).1 Megaton Li-Ar
T2HK, DUSEL .. Frejus
Gran Sasso Annex
11(No Transcript)
12European Regional Outlook
- V. Palladino
- NuFact06
- UC Irvine, Tue Aug 29, 2006
13what have we got in Europe? how much
is that worth?
the CNGS
OPERA
Icarus
BENE and HIPPI
Betabeam DS
ISS Groups
SPL CDR2
HARP
MICE
MERIT
Laguna
The CERN Council Strategy Document
14The CNGS has started
15µ/p just about right
Preliminary Courtesy P. Sala and E. Gschwendtner
High intensity mid october
Thanks, Malika Konrad et al. !
16OPERA it is worth silver (t detection)
?µ/?e ??t t
17ICARUS beyond . worth platinum
?µ??e
18BENE/CARE 2004-2008 rooted in the Muon Study
Groups, active since 1998
CERN
worth travel money hopefully the embryo of a
real continental collaboration
France CEA, CNRS-IN2P3
Germany TUM, GSI, FZJ
Spain CSIC Universities
Italy INFN Labs Universities
the UKNF includes new Cockroft Adams
Institutes!
UK CCLRC Universities
B Louvain
CH PSI Universities
NB HIPPI is worth a lot 3.6 M from EC
only
19A new accelerator neutrino facility?
CARE Coordinated Accelerator RD in
Europe
Within CARE (ECFA) 3 Networks BENE
2004-2008
and 4 JRAs HIPPI
20 stronger BENE SG
- PHYSICS Mezzetto (Padua) Donini (Madrid)
- DRIVER Zito (CEA)
- TARGET Densham (RAL)
- COLLECTION Dracos (IN2P3)
- NOVEL BEAMS MUFRONT Long (IC London)
- MUEND Meot (CEA/IN2P3)
BETABEAM Lindroos (CERN)
21Betabeam Design Study 2005-2008 worth several M
(1 from EU, within Eurisol)
echo of progress at Nufact06 with Fabichs
plenary talk and
22Nobel class contribution superior production
of Li B parents
C. Rubbia
23ISS Detector Group worth gold? Blondel, Soler
?e ? ?µ
Super Minos, INO .. Hyper-CDHS
24ISS Physics Group
very solid Long .. Donini, Gomez-Cadenas,
Hernandez, Huber, King, Lindner, Mezzetto,
Winter many more boosted the
work of comparison, systematics included
having it in place is a major asset
ISS Accelerator Group
EU effort not yet adequate UKNF, CEA
we need the CERN divisions
25Superconducting Proton Linac (SPL) CDR2
a 4 MMW Backbone
5 GeV appear possible
26At last, large angle data from HARP
27Muon Ionization Cooling experiment at RAL
Muon Ionization Cooling Experiment at RAL
28(No Transcript)
29Pivot Target Collection CERN PS Experiment
can we digest the MMW?
30(No Transcript)
31(No Transcript)
32The CERN Council Strategy Process
Almost one year long Two CERN task forces PAF
proton accelerators for the future POFPA
physics opportunities of future proton
accelerators many other input from all
sectors in Europe Orsay Preparatory Open
Symposium Jan 30-Feb1 Zeuthen Closed Meeting of
the strategy group May 2-6
Special session of Council in Lisbon Jul 14
33BENEs document to Council
outline and plea for a timely RD program
CERN Yellow Report 2006-05 available at
http//bene.web.cern.ch/bene/
34(No Transcript)
35High power?
HIPPI FETS
36the real task and challenge
creation of a continental collaboration
with a leading CERN kernel
with regular and adequate
participation funding from each national
lab
and national
agency
richness of options makes consensus more
laborious NB legitimate different scientific
interests do exist
need an unprecedented level of coherence good
will otherwise .. LHC upgrade,
ILC, CLIC .
37ISS (and IDS) in a nutshell
- Physics boosted comparison unprecedently,
- including systematics GLOBES !!!!!!!!! M.
Lindner - Accelerator updated NuFact Baseline,
- defined RD priorities
- started exploring sinergies with Superbeams
- Detector
- rejuvenated simulations, established
baselines - for the few main options, defined RD
priorities
38(No Transcript)
39(No Transcript)
40(No Transcript)
41Set one up in Europe!
OK !!!
FP7 EU ? Collaboration
42a European Neutrino Oversight Body
A very high priority aim
for BENE and future initiatives to report to
to bring about the indispensable consensus
PAF shows the way MMW Driver, Target,
Collectors ..
everybody needs them
need advice help of
CARE ESGARD
43BENE efforts for FP7 Please contact us and join
to help NuFactSuperbeam Design Study Rob
Edgecock(RAL) and Marcos Dracos(IN2P3) have taken
the responsibility to start a WG assembling a
first skeleton of proposal to be presented at
CARE06 in Frascati (Nov14-17). This was given
good priority by ESGARD and is at the moment the
most promising immediate option that we
have. Betabeam Design Study A DS study is
already in progress in the Eurisol framework.
Mats Lindroos (CERN) has taken the task to
explore within the present DS a first skeleton of
a second phase proposal. At the moment, however,
it appears that we will have to delay this to the
later FP7 DS call. Mats will present his present
thinking at CARE06 Several Joint Research
Activities (JRA), IA1- European proton
accelerator RD high power option for
a proton driver sector JRA M. Zito/CEA
and J. Pozimski /RAL will follow it
target sector (a WP in a larger JRA? )
C. Densham/RAL and M. Dracos/IN2P3 have taken the
charge of establishing contacts A
Networking Activity (NA) containing a fraction of
BENE areas of interest could be accommodated in
this IA. IA2-Novel accelerating
techniques Strengthening "our"
new RAL muon facility could be part of it too. A
MICE JRA is being prepared by K. Kyberd and A.
Blondel. A JRA on FFAGs.
Francois Meot (IN2P3/CEA) has accepted the task,
in collaboration with R. Edgecock, S. Machida
No discussion on any Networking
Activity (NA) nor Transnational Access has yet
taken place in this IA. IA3 Superconducting RF
(SCRF) accelerators RD Rebecca
Saviour of Lancaster has accepted to be BENEs RF
expert that will foster BENE interests in this
IA.
44Immediate plans
Design Study Proposal(s) NOW
December 1 Extended draft of Design Study
description(s)
Visit to all interested laboratories in Europe
Up to Feb 19
Feb 19-21 CERN
International Meeting on ISS to IDSs transition
harmonising FP7 and IDSs
Mid April?
DS Proposal(s) in
IA Proposal(s) immediately later
45Next 18 months
46THE END
47BENE efforts for FP7 Please contact us and join
to help FP7 is finally starting. A first FP7
call, for Design studies, is expected before the
end of the year. Proposals will be due in April,
a few months later. Approval could bring first
funding at the beginnining of 2008 or so. A
second call, for Integrating Activities, is
expected Nov 07, with Mar 08 as a deadline, with
first funding early 2009. This must contain NAs,
TAs, JRAs, see below Next relevant calls 2009 !!!
We should not be stalling for two more years
!! We need the largest possible consensus and
coherence. It will clearly not be easy to
assemble all the conditions, support from CERN
and National agencies and Laboratories, for
successful bids. According to the recent
ESGARD/CARE preliminary plan, see
http//bene.web.cern.ch/bene/Working-groups_mandat
e.doc, BENE could file bids for Two Design
Studies (DS) DSs are studies of feasibility, to
be carried out by a European collaboration,
funded (presumably for about 1/3?) by EU and
working in collaboration with international
partners. Recent news are that the contribution
from EC could be larger than originally
indicated, as large as 5 M Euros, and RD work
could be included in addition to feasibility
studied. NuFactSuperbeam Design Study Rob
Edgecock(RAL) and Marcos Dracos(IN2P3) have taken
the responsibility to start a WG assembling a
first skeleton of proposal to be presented at
CARE06 in Frascati (Nov14-17). This was given
good priority by ESGARD and is at the moment the
most promising immediate option that we have.
Betabeam Design Study A DS study is already in
progress in the Eurisol framework. Mats Lindroos
(CERN) has taken the task to explore within the
present DS a first skeleton of a second phase
proposal. At the moment, however, it appears that
we will have to delay this to the later FP7 DS
call. Mats will present his present thinking at
CARE06 in Frascati (Nov14-17). Several Joint
Research Activities (JRA), JRAs are technical
RD projects on realization of key prototypes,
demonstrations of performance and the like, to
be carried out by a European collaboration ,
funded (presumably for about 1/3?) by EU and
working in collaboration with international
partners. Bids for JRAs should take place
within the framework of one of the Integrating
Activities that ESGARD intends to promote. Many
LOIs have been received by ESGARD and more are
coming. The task is now the one to select the
ones to be actually proposed as JRAs within
Ias. At the moment, three IAs are envisaged,
but a different format is not excluded. A first
meeting of the task force preparing these
proposals took place at CERN on Oct 30. A brief
summary of the state of each follows
Presentations from the three coordinators will
be presented at CARE06 on Thu Nov 16 afternoon.
IA1- European proton accelerator RD
R. Garoby is coordinating the preparation of this
proposal. The general theme is proton
accelerator RD, strengthening LHC and the CERN
p complex. The total cost of related LOIs is
well above 60 M, a reasonable goal is applying
for 15 M from EU, with 45 M as total budget.
Activities relevant for future neutrino beams
would take place in the high power proton driver
sector (a JRA being proposed in this area under
the responsability of Garoby and collaborators).
M. Zito/CEA and J. Pozimski /RAL and others will
follow this for BENE exploring also
opportunities in the sector of Rapid Cycling
Synchrothrons for neutrino applications (NB we
need them to be truly rapid, 50 Hz eventually,
and therefore NC!).) and target sector (where a
WP on high power targetry collection can be
envisaged within a JRA on high power and
radiation deposition in materials, chiefly
motivated by the RD for a high quality
collimators for LHC). C. Densham/RAL and M.
Dracos/IN2P3 have taken the charge of
establishing contacts with all EU experts, in and
out of the particle physics community, in
particular the CERN CNGS and ISOLDE experts, and
to try to define the content of such a WP.
CARE06 in Frascati should help these contacts.
A Networking Activity (NA) containing a fraction
of BENE areas of interest could be accommodated
in this IA. Transnational Access
options have not yet been seriously considered
yet. IA2-Novel accelerating techniques
E. Jensen is coordinating the
preparation of this proposal. This is much less
advanced than IA1 The total
cost of related LOIs is 85 M. It has to be
reduced dramatically. The leitmotif of the IA is
strenghtening CTF3. But
strengthening "our" new RAL muon facility could
be part of it too. A MICE JRA is being prepared
by K. Kyberd and A. Blondel.
A JRA on FFAGs appears negotiable, if downsized.
Francois Meot (IN2P3/CEA) has accepted the task,
in collaboration with R. Edgecock, S.
Machida and other experts of pushing this within
the team preparing this IA proposal.
Discussion at CARE06 should prove very
instrumental. No discussion on any
Networking Activity (NA) or Transnational Access
has yet taken place in this IA. IA3
Superconducting RF (SCRF) accelerators RD
O. Napoly is coordinating the preparation of
this proposal. This is also less advanced than
IA1. The total cost of
related LOIs is 31 M, with more big ones still
coming. One is a JRA for a big RF testing
facility. A JRA on 200 Mhz
muon acceleration cavities could be accommodated
in this. RD on p acceleration cavity may
instead go to WG1, will see Rebecca
Saviour of Lancaster has accepted to be BENEs RF
expert that will foster BENE interests in this
IA. Discussion at CARE06 should again
prove very instrumental. No discussion
on Transnational Access has yet taken place in
this IA. Olivier has in mind a single large SCRF
NA. Finally, outside the framework of CARE, we
intend to propose also a neutrino detector test
facility at CERN. Paul Soler will be in charge
of fostering this in connection with the BENE
steering group. The right FP7 framework will
have to identified, while contacts begin,
starting with the (few !) neutrino physicists
left at CERN. Timeline At CARE06 we will plan
work on all of this. Design Studies being the
most urgent priority. Deadline is April,
remember! A detailed calendar will be issued. We
already know that one next major appointment will
be a meeting on the transition from the
International Scoping Study (ISS) to the
International Design studi(es), the IDSs. This
will be Feb 19-21 at CERN. This will focus on our
plans in the frame of our international
collaboration with pur US, Japanese, Indian
collaborators. That clearly we need to harmonise
with our FP7 plans.
48Reserves
49A complete Euro-Neutrino Design Study physics,
accelerators, detectors, baselines
is next natural step for accelerator ?
ISS IDS/FP7 DS
- ISS International Scoping Study American and
Asian collaborations as full partners - June 2005 to late 2006 mostly neutrino
factory superbeams - define priorities and ways of Design Study
- consolidate regional international
collaboration - us in EU, gain support of Council and ECFA
- IDS International Design Study (neutrino
factory superbeams betabeam) - start late 2006 or early 2007
- achieve higher funding, start design effort
- us in EU,
prepare FP7 Proposal (March 2007, it seems) - structure EU collaboration, get CERN involved
as much as possible - FP7 DS EC (support for EU effort in the) Design
Study CNGS beyond - aiming at first EC funds Jan 1, 2008
- inter-twined with IDS
- keeping
American and Asian collaborations as full
partners . T2K , Nova
CDHS CHARM I/II CHORUS NOMAD OPERA ICARUS
BENE
50guessing the Content of the Design Study
conceptual feasibility study of the following
components a high power proton driver of at
least 4-5 GeV the engineering of the handling,
containment and safety aspects of a hi power
target collection station a performing and
cost effective muon phase rotation and cooling
channel non-scaling FFAGs for acceleration of
muons (and possibly protons) an optimised
storage ring for muons higher intensity and
higher gamma beta beams technical preparatory
(RD) projects, aiming at demonstrating the
existence of at least one adequate choice of
target an extended lifetime of the horn
prototypes at high rate and radiation muon
ionization cooling, by completion of the MICE
experimental program operation of a non-scaling
FFAG RF cavities and kicker magnets for fast
manipulation of muon beams specific detector
RD and design efforts on photo detector
development for very large far detectors developme
nts of the liquid argon technique including the
presence of magnetic field study and tests of a
magnetic calorimeter susceptible to be built with
a mass of up to 100 kton. detectors dedicated
for tau detection such as the emulsion cloud
chamber last but not least the necessary near
detector concepts and beam instrumentation
pre-submitting it now to ECFA/ESGARD scrutiny
51(No Transcript)
52(No Transcript)
53Agenda of the BENE day at RAL gtgt Fri Apr 28
Morning general introduction gtgt gtgt 900
Status and prospect of the ISS, towards the IDS
(Dornan) gtgt 910 Address from ESFRI Chair (J.
Wood) gtgt 940 News from EC (R. Aleksan, tbc) gtgt
1000 FP7 (DS, JRA's) and general outlook in EU
(Edgecock) gtgt 1030 US contributions to the IDS
(A.Bross) gtgt gtgt 1040 Break gtgt gtgt 1100 Japan
contribution to the IDS (Kuno) gtgt 1120 Other
contributions to the IDS (Mondal, tbc) gtgt gtgt
1200 General Discussion until lunch gtgt gtgt
gtgt Fri Apr 28 Afternoon EU contributions to
the IDS() gt gtgt 1) Initiative in the Physics
studies sector (Mezzetto/Donini 20') gtgt 2)
Initiative in the Proton driver sector(Cavata
10') gtgt 3) Initiative in the Target sector
(Bennett 10') gtgt 4) Initiative in the Collection
sector (Dracos 10') gtgt 5) Initiative in the Muon
Front End sector (Long 10') gtgt 6) Initiative in
the Muon Back End sector (Meot 10') gtgt 7)
Initiative in the Betabeam sector (Lindroos
15-20') gtgt 8) Initiative in the Neutrino
detector sector (Blondel 20') General
Discussion on EU contributions to the IDS
(introduced chaired by R.
Garoby) () NB this will be match very closely
our requests to FP7
54proud to have gotten this far
- Matching our two crucial 2005 milestones
-
- Physics case developped as far as possible today
- in the most international context possible
- becoming a polished BENE Interim Report
- Design Study road traced by ISS
in spite of outstanding difficulties smaller
size of our community its core of active
people CERN contribution being resurrected
only now (very slowly) richness of options
that makes consensus more laborious NB
legitimate different scientific interests do
exist collapse of FP6 calls
and
more
55(No Transcript)
56(No Transcript)
57After a few nice forward jumps1 step back and ½
step forward
2 0 0 3 - 2 0 0 4
approval of BENE NA within I3 (CARE)
MMW Workshop
Villars beyond
Nov 04 Niet!
Mar 05 Niet!
I3??
FP6 Design Study?
1 year ISS
Mar 05
Jun 05-Aug 06
FP7WDS Design Study
Mar 07?
58Two main physics strategies
use of the high neutrino rate (gt1020/year) and
energy (10-50 GeV) of Neutrino Factory
LMD (Hyper-MINOS)
detector of large but not huge mass
(50-100 Kt),
necessarily magnetic
(a dense magnetized Iron
detector,
or, possibly,
Li-Argon),
a few 1000 Km away.
m ? ?e ?m
use of the lower neutrino rate (1018-19/year) and
energy (sub-GeV) of Betabeam Megaton
(Hyper-Kamioka) low
density detector of very large mass (0.5-1 Mt)
and volume
(0.5-1 Mm3)
non magnetic
(a Water Cerenkov detector,
or possibly, again Li-Argon),
a few 100 Km away.
b ? ?e
59EU Neutrino Complex
Garoby Haseroth Lindroos
BetaRing
Muon Complex
G.Sasso LMD 0.1 Mton
Proton complex
Frejus 1 Mton Water C
60Superbeam (high power conventional beams)
p ? ?m
is less performing, per se
but does have technical synergy with the
NuFact
largely coincides with the front end
of a Factory
solving the technical challenges of a
several MegaWatt
proton driver and target
collection system,
on the way to build a
factory,
yields a superbeam facility
essentially for free
(not its detector, however!)
and does have scientific synergy with the
Betabeam
can use the same detector
combination has some truely unique features
1) oscillation signal is ?e??µ in the first,
?µ??e. in the
second,
one calibrates the signal (and
background) of the other !
2) T-reversal and
CPT asymmetries can be measured
likely to be integrated in both strategies
61Esample of comparison of physics reach ?13 and
CP violating phase
Figure 7 99CL d sensitivity of the beta-beam,
of the SPL-SuperBeam, and of their combination,
see text. Dotted line is the combined
Superbeambeta-beam sensitivity computed for
sign(Dm2)-1. Sensitivities are compared with a
50 GeV Neutrino Factory producing 21020m
decays/straight section/year, and two 40 kton
detectors at 3000 and 7000 km
Comparable merits NuFact
somewhat better and more versatile for ?
oscillations Megaton offers sinergy
with N decay and more
!!!
NB conclusions highly preliminary
based on still not well agreed
yardsticks must now be
re-scrutinized much more in depth (ISS)
62A general remark
Betabeam Megaton
NuFact LMD
and
are complementary
!!!!!!!!!!! each has merits
unaccesible to the other (matter
effects, CP, T , CPT violation, p decay, astroph.
cosmology .. )
!
!
by means of truely international collaboration
we could and should aim at having both facilities
we must push both very actively catch
opportunities wherever they emerge seriously aim
at building one in Europe in the construction
window
63Further caveat
Intermediate solutions also emerging !
Higher energy and higher rate betabeams
heading to detectors at intermediate distances
thou technically more difficult (
beta acceleration in new higher energy SPS
or LHC !)
do deserve very careful attention
64HyperK UNO Memphys
100 participants
65 All aspects of Megaton physics revised and
updated
state of the art material for full
elaboration of BENE physics case
66Strong reinforcement of international cooperation
achieved
67 200 participants
All aspects of future ? physics revised and
updated
state of the art material for full elaboration
of BENE physics case
68NuFact Scientific Program
69Sunday June 26 900-1300
WW RD Session
1) Physics Studies Status priorities
1) Accelerator RD Status priorities
2) Neutrino Detectors Status priorities
PANEL OPEN DISCUSSION
Launch International Scoping Study to report at
NuFact06
70A Summer School accompanied the workshop 22
students, 12 lecturers
71The International Scoping Study (ISS) on
Neutrino Factories and Superbeams
that must advance to same level of progress as
Betabeams
A joint venture, jointly set up by the
coordinators of
the US Neutrino Factory Collaboration
the Japanese NuFact-J Work
Group the Eu BENE Network
and the host
(RAL) UKNF Collaboration
S. Geer Y. Kuno V. Palladino K. Peach
to lay the foundation of a full blown
International Design Study
72All aspects included, except accelerator Betabeam
studies
started in March-April by RAL
73International Scoping Study agenda for one
year
Matching funds
- 22-24 Sep CERN a success !!!
- Late January KEK
- Mid April RAL
- Late August NuFact06 in Irvine
- hopefully, NuFact06 will
- launch International Design
Study
topical intermediate workshops
Physics, London, 14-21 Nov.
and FP7 Eu Design Study
74Physics compare performance of various options
on equal footing of parameters and
conventions and agreed standards of resolutions,
simulation etc. identify tools needed to do so
(e.g. Globes upgraded?) propose best values
of baselines, beam energies etc..
(Y. Nagashima)
The three sectors of SS (andDS)
NB BetaBeam included
Detectors (NEW!) Water Cherenkov
(1000kton) Magnetized Iron Calorimeter
(50kton) Low Z scintillator (100 kton) Liquid
Argon TPC (100 kton) Hybrid Emulsion (4
kton) Near detectors (and instrumentation)
(A.Blondel)
P. Dornan
Accelerator -- proton driver (energy, time
structure and consequences) -- target and capture
(chose target and capture system) -- phase
rotation and cooling -- acceleration and
storage evaluate economic interplays and
risks include a measure of costing and safety
assessment
(M. Zisman)
75BENE the longer term plan
2005 06 07 08 09 10
11 19
Construction window
Int. Scoping Study()
feasibility
Design Study
Physics
Feasibility TPW
CDR at the time of end of LHC payment first
LHC results ILC decision be ready to catch any
construction window
HIPPI, HARP
MERIT
MICE
PRISM, EMMA
NB Betabeam CDR End 2009 !
76The HARP experiment
TPC
Total Acceptance
Scan CERN PS energy range RCS is an option
Forward Spectrometer
77The MERIT ( nTof 11) experiment
holds the key to any superbeam !!! tests the
single shot behavior at MMW driver of target and
collection (solenoid, horn?)
can we master the MMW?
should make that more known
better supported and manned
should evolve that into a MMW target
and collector Test Area?
The most crucial experiment for the future of the
?
78Liquid jet target in 15T mag. field
79MICE . crucial demonstration esperiment
for the
feasibility of a Neutrino Factory muon
ionisation cooling
Phase I completely funded by now- Datataking
starts April 1 2007
80(No Transcript)
81Emma
82One crucial task of BENE in the ISS year
assemble a real EDS (Eu DesignStudy)
collaboration !!!!! that
will sign and provide the
manpower largest part of the funds,
matching funds, for
a FP7 bid able to have
the blessing
of ECFA and
good odds of approval in Brussels.
find the synthesis of so far not obviously
converging interests CERN, INFN, CCLRC,
IN2P3, CEA, PPARC, CSIC, Germany?,
Belgium, NIKHEF, everybody
CERN positive attitude towards the ISS and
BENEs initiative willingness to
assemble a small ISS task force
will no doubt greatly help
a
few fractions of FTE can make an impact
83Plans for the year ahead
Interim BENE Scientific Report, based on
NNN05,NuFact05, ISS
Draft http//people.na.infn.it/palladin/BENEScien
tificInterimReport
input to the strategic discussion in
progress FPA, POFPA
Akesson/Peach Strategy group (Orsay Jan 30)
Conclude Scoping Study (NuFact06) define the
content of WDS and FP7 DS
Assemble FP7 Collaboration prepare FP7
proposal bridge over Aug 06 to FP7 funding
(1Jan2008?)
84Milestones Deliverables BENE III period Jan 06
- Jun07
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Nov Dec Jan Fe
b Mar Apr May Jun
BENESG 1/ month
85Since CARESG Apr 11
- Joint BENE 3rd ISS meeting RAL 24-25 Apr
-
- 28 April LOI !!!! BENE Midterm Report gets
yellow in May
Open BENE SG 4 Jul CERN (FP7) CERN Council
Strategy Document 4th meeting of the ISS at UCI
(21-23 Aug) NuFact06 (24-30)
End of the ISS, next steps