Title: REDUCING EMISSIONS FROM
1REDUCING EMISSIONS FROM DEFORESTATION and
Degradation (REDD) IN DEVELOPING COUNTRIES
Background and status of UNFCCC Policy Process
2Acronyms
- UNFCCC United Nations Framework Convention on
Climate Change - COP Conference of the Parties
- RED(D) Reducing Emissions from Deforestation
(and Degradation) - SBSTA Subsidiary Body for Scientific and
Technological Advice - CDM Clean Development Mechanism
3Submission by the Governments ofPapua New
Guinea Costa RicaReducing Emissions from
Deforestation in Developing CountriesApproaches
to Stimulate ActionEleventh Conference of the
Parties to the UNFCCC Agenda Item 6
Enter RED... Montreal, Nov 2005
4REDD in the UNFCCC process
- 2005
- December - Montreal RED is placed on the UNFCCC
agenda with 2 year recommendations deadline - 2006-2007
- 2 SBSTA workshops on scientific, technical, and
policy issues of REDD - December 2007
- Bali 2 year deadline reached SBSTA recommends
inclusion of degradation Bali Action Plan
includes REDD as a potential option to reach
climate goals
5Issue Scale
- National vs Project-level approach
- National accounting approach
- avoids many problems with leakage that kept REDD
out of CDM - could drive deeper Annex I commitments
- Supports development of cross-sectoral policies
to address drivers of deforestation - Subnational accounting approach
- May allow broader initial participation
- Quicker start
- Promotes private sector financing
6Issue Baselines
- National historical reference period based on
emissions - Forward-looking baseline modeling future
business as usual emissions - Baseline of carbon stocks
- Global average emissions baseline
- Hybrid approach
- Using combination of historical emissions and
carbon stocks
7Issue Scope
- Include degradation?
- Include maintenance of carbon stocks?
- Include regrowth/increase in carbon stocks?
- What about countries that have not yet
deforested? Perverse incentive? - Costa Rica declining deforestation
- Congo Basin limited degradation
- Brazil extensive historical deforestation
- Ghana high deforestation rates
8Issue Financing Mechanism
- Market
- Credits created for emissions reduced, which can
be sold in carbon market and used for countries
to meet emission reduction targets - Non-market approach
- Annex I countries contribute voluntarily to large
fund not linked to market - Levy on emissions trading to fund REDD
- Hybrid approaches
- Separate market for REDD credits
- And many others....
9All approaches advantage some countries and
disadvantage others
- National level accounting favors countries with
strong measurement and monitoring capacity, and
government infrastructure for tracking and
accounting - Historical baselines favors countries with high
levels of historical deforestation - Scope including deforestation only favors
countries with high deforestation rates
including degradation favors countries with
logging and fuelwood gathering as primary forest
emissions
10Advantage/Disadvantage contd
- Scope contd - including maintenance and
regrowth of carbon stocks favors countries with
low historical emissions and high carbon stocks,
as well as countries with net carbon gain in
forests - Financial mechanism depends on structure
11Next steps for REDD
- Dec 2008 Poland Conference of the Parties
- Dec 2009 Deadline for establishing Kyoto
Protocol successor Copenhagen Protocol? - Success of REDD is heavily dependent on consensus
on comprehensive climate agreement to follow
Kyoto Protocols 2012 expiration
12Thanks for your attention
Tracy Johns The Woods Hole Research
Center tjohns_at_whrc.org
13Compensated Reduction
- Amazon Institute of Environmental Research,
Environmental Defense, The Woods Hole Research
Center - Scale - National level accounting
- Baseline National historical baseline
- Scope - Could include degradation maintenance or
regrowth of carbon stocks not included - Financing Mechanism - Market-based approach
14PNG Proposal
- Scale National level accounting
- Baseline national historical reference period
at least 5 years - Scope can include degradation separate fund
for maintenance and growth of carbon stocks - Financing mechanism market-based approach
- Includes Development Adjustment Factor applied
to baseline to reflect national circumstances
15Stock-Flow Approach
- The Woods Hole Research Center based partly on
Strassburg Global Baseline Approach - Scale National-level acounting
- Baseline Global historical baseline
- Scope can include degradation based on both
emissions and carbon stocks - Financial mechanism could be market or
fund-based
16Nested Approach
- Climate Focus, CATIE, Colombia
- Scale combination of subnational and national
accounting - Baseline project baselines nested into future
national baseline - Scope includes degradation does not include
maintenance or regrowth - Financing mechanism market-based approach
17Strassburg Global Baseline Approach
- Bernardo Strassburg, University of East Anglia,
UK - Scale national-level accounting
- Baseline global historical baseline
- Scope can include degradation does not include
maintenance or regrowth of carbon stocks - Financial mechanism could be market or
fund-based
18Carbon Stock Approach
- Climate Focus, Center for International
Environmental Law similar approach favored by
India - Scale national-level accounting
- Baseline based on current carbon stocks, not
emissions - Scope because based on stocks, includes
deforestation, degradation, maintenance and
regrowth of carbon stocks - Financing Mechanism market-based approach
19Dual Markets Approach
- Center for Clean Air Policy Greenpeace favors a
similar approach - Scale national-level accounting
- Baseline national historical baseline
- Scope Includes degradation does not include
maintenance or regrowth of carbon stocks - Financial mechanism market/fund hybrid
separate market for REDD credits
20Brazil Proposal
- Scope National-level accounting
- Baseline modified national historical
reference emission rate - Scale Focus on deforestation does not include
maintenance or regrowth of carbon stocks - Financing Mechanism competitive Fund-based
approach