Technology Infrastructure - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 25
About This Presentation
Title:

Technology Infrastructure

Description:

GERD / GDP: around %0.64. R&D expenditures by sector: ` in universities 0 in private sector ... Number of registered patents: around 1,200 (less than 100 of ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:109
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 26
Provided by: hanz151
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Technology Infrastructure


1
Technology Infrastructure
  • SCIENCE TECHNOLOGY PARKS
  • IN TURKEY
  • MUSTAFA ATILLA
  • CEO, Ankara Cyberpark, Turkey
  • Knowledge Economy Forum IV
  • March 22-24, 2004
  • Istanbul, Turkey

2
TURKEY RD CAPACITY
  • GERD / GDP around 0.64
  • RD expenditures by sector
  • 60 in universities
  • 30 in private sector
  • 10 in public sector
  • Number of registered patents around 1,200
    (less than 100 of which are native patents)
  • Number of scientific publications more than
    10,000

Number of people in RD by Sector  
(SSI, 2004)
3
TURKEY RD CAPACITY
Source OECD MSTI database, Nov. 2003
4
SOME RD RELATED PROBLEMS OF TURKEY
  • Legislation (particularly inefficient and
    insufficient incentive mechanisms) was the
    biggest barrier in front of RD activities for
    many years.
  • An important portion of RD investment is made by
    governmental institutions or universities
  • Insufficient financial resources and bureacuracy
    in access to existing financial resources
  • Absence of incentive mechanisms for RD
    commercialization
  • Weak innovation culture and poor RD
    infrastructure
  • IT related products and software form an
    important import category. There is a big
    negative imbalance in IT exports/imports.
  • The imbalance between the number of scientific
    publications and patents is an important
    indicator showing Turkeys inability to convert
    the scientific research studies into applicable
    knowledge and technological products.

5
HOW STPs EMERGED IN TURKEY?
  • Technopark concept taken in the agenda of Turkey
    only in the mid 90s (40 years after
    establishment of Silicon Valley!)
  • Like many developing countries, such as India,
    China, Malaysia, Singapore, Taiwan, Thailand
    Turkey also started to use STPs as its primary
    strategy for
  • promoting research and development, and
    technology transfer,
  • reducing brain drain by providing employment for
    high-skilled IT and RD workers
  • attracting foreign direct investment and
    generating foreign exchange from selling software
    and RD products for export
  • generating sustainable economic growth and local
    know how

6
TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT ZONES LAW (LAW NO4691),
TURKEY
  • To promote the establishment of science and
    technology parks under the guidance and lead of
    universities some legislations were made by
    Ministry of Industry and Trade
  • Technology Development Zones (TDZ) Law (Law
    No4691), which came into force on 06.07.2001,
    and
  • Application Regulation of this Law, which came
    into force on 19.06.2002.
  • With this law, companies are encouraged to invest
    more in RD and software development, through tax
    incentives.
  • Any kind of software development activity is
    considered as an RD activity according to the
    law.
  • In establishing a STP, involvement of an higher
    education or a research institution as a founder
    is a mandatory requirement in the law

7
TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT ZONES LAW (LAW NO4691),
TURKEY
  • The aim of the law is
  • to increase synergy between universities,
    research institutes and industry,
  • to increase international competitiveness and
    export potential of industry by
    adapting/developing high/advanced technologies,
  • to facilitate more innovations,
  • to increase the quality of technological
    products,
  • to increase productivity,
  • to commercialize technological knowledge,
  • to support technology based entrepreneurship,
  • to enable SMEs to adapt to new and advanced
    technologies,
  • to create investment opportunities in technology
    intensive areas,
  • to create employment opportunities for
    researchers and qualified persons,
  • to help technology transfer,
  • to provide technological infrastructure
    attracting foreign capital and international
    firms providing high/advanced technologies.

8
TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT ZONES LAW (LAW NO4691),
TURKEY
  • Tax Exemptions and Incentives provided with
    the law (till the end of 2013)
  • Income and corporate tax exemptions for the
    operating company
  • Income and corporate tax exemptions for the
    incomes generated from software development and
    RD activities of the companies operating in
    these zones
  • Income tax exemptions for the salaries of the
    researchers, software development staff and RD
    personnel working in these zones
  • VAT exemptions for the sofware development
    activities
  • Sponsored aid and donations for the individuals
    and institutions having RD activities in the
    zone
  • Right of recruitment of individuals from
    government research organizations or universities
    in the zone with the approval of their
    organizations. (The income obtained in the zone
    by academicians or research personnel are
    exempted from the university revolving fund
    deductions)
  • Legal permission for academicians to establish
    firms or become a partner of existing firms in
    the zones to commercialize their academic works
    (with the approval of their university)

9
Similar RD Tax Incentives in USA and Europe
10
TDZs in TURKEY(As of March 2005)
  • Ankara Cyberpark (Bilkent University, Ankara)
  • METU Technopolis (METU, Ankara)
  • Hacettepe Technopolis (Hacettepe University,
    Ankara)
  • GOSB Technopark (Sabanci University and Kocaeli
    University,Kocaeli)
  • TÜBITAK MAM (TÜBITAK MAM, Kocaeli)
  • Istanbul Teknik University ARI Technopolis (ITÜ,
    Istanbul)
  • Izmir TDZ (Izmir YTE, 9 Eylül Univ., Ege Univ.,
    Izmir)
  • Yildiz Teknik Üniversitesi TDZ (YTÜ, Istanbul)
  • Kocaeli Üniversitesi TDZ (Kocaeli University,
    Kocaeli)
  • Eskisehir TDZ (Anadolu Univ., Yunus Emre Univ.,
    Eskisehir)
  • Istanbul University TDZ (Istanbul University,
    Istanbul)
  • Selçuk University TDZ (Selçuk University, Konya)
  • Bati Akdeniz Univ. TDZ (Bati Akdeniz University,
    Antalya)
  • Karadeniz Teknik Univ. TDZ (Karadeniz Tek. Univ.,
    Trabzon)
  • Erciyes University TDZ (Erciyes University,
    Kayseri)
  • Çukurova University TDZ (Çukurova University,
    Adana)

11
TDZS in TURKEY(As of March 2005)
Active Technoparks 1.Cyberpark 2.METU 3.Hacettepe
4.GOSB 5.TÜBITAK MAM 6.ITU ARI Technoparks
atInitial Dev. Stage 7. Izmir 8. Yildiz 9.
Kocaeli 10. Eskisehir 11. Istanbul 12.
Selçuk 13. Bati Akdeniz 14. Karadeniz Teknik
15. Erciyes 16. Çukurova
8
6
11
9
5
4
14
1
3
2
10
12
15
7
16
13
12
TDZS in TURKEY
  • Number of Companies more than 300
  • Number of RD personnel around 2500
  • Number of support personnel around 1100

13
HOW STPs ARE INTEGRATED WITH THE OTHER COMPONENTS
OF NATIONAL INNOVATION SYSTEM OF TURKEY?
  • RD support infrastructure in Turkey have been
    comprised of some institutions providing RD
    financing, while these supports are usually very
    limited and diffucult to obtain.
  • After the Technology Development Zones Law
    providing important incentives for companies
    located in STPs, STPs have been important
    components added to our national innovation
    system.
  • A new RD loan In 2005, more than 300 million
    USD RD loan is allocated from the governmental
    budget, which will be distributed through TÜBITAK.

14
INSTITUTIONS PROVIDING RD FINANCING
  • 1. TTGV - Technology Development Foundation of
    Turkey
  • Technology Development Financing - Support RD
    activities on marketable product and process
    development / improvement
  • Venture Capital
  • Technoparks -Innovation Centers Start-ups
  • Training, Tech. Assist. and other activities
  • Sources of Fund
  • Treasury-World Bank funded RD Programs
  • UFT Undersecreteriat of Foreign Trade funded RD
    Program
  • Own resources

15
INSTITUTIONS PROVIDING RD FINANCING
  • 2. TÜBITAK-TIDEB / Scientific and Technical
    Research Council Of Turkey-Technology Monitoring
    and Evaluation Board
  • As of 2004, total support of around 160 M for
    2000 RD projects
  • Support on grant basis
  • From concept development to trial production
    stages, exclusively the costs of the research
    activities
  • Sources of Fund
  • UFT Undersecreteriat of Foreign Trade Fund
    (DEFIF-Support and Price Stabilization Fund)
  • New RD Loan gt 300 million USD for 2005 (support
    mechanisms will be determined soon)

16
INSTITUTIONS PROVIDING RD FINANCING
  • 3. KOSGEB - Ministry of Industry and Trade /
    Small and Medium Size Industry Development
    Organization
  • Technology RD Support
  • Supports on Repayable Basis
  • Supports on Grant Basis
  • Source of Fund State Budget
  • 4. International Resources, like 6th Framework
    Program

17
HOW BEING LOCATED IN A STP PROVIDES AN ADVANTAGE?
  • Some research findings (UKSPA 2003) show that
    STPs have a positive affect on economic
    development of a region / country. Accordingly,
    STP based companies
  • Have higher growth rates than similar companies
    at other locations in terms of employment,
    business potential and physical area.
  • Have better overall commercial performance than
    similar firms located elsewhere.
  • Have higher proportion of qualified scientists
    and engineers than off-park companies.
  • Have easier access to finance, like venture
    capital and governmental grants on RD.
  • Believe that STPs are prestigeous places to work
    on.
  • Believe that the joint facilities create a better
    working and living environment.

18
SOME PERFORMANCE INDICATORS OF STPs in TURKEY
  • Research among different Turkish STPs showed
    that
  • Through tax incentives, companies are encouraged
    to invest more in RD and software development,
    so RD expenditure of the on-park companies have
    generally increased.
  • IT related activities and the establishment of
    new companies working on software development
    increased
  • Since the cost of RD personnel have decreased,
    employment of qualified staff has increased among
    on-park companies, as well as increased
    employment through newly established companies
  • Positive effects to universities increased
    image, additional income, increased joint RD
    projects with private sector
  • Increased usage of university resources
    (academics, students, laboratories, social
    facilities etc.) by on-park companies

19
FACTORS AFFECTING THE SUCCESS OF STPs
  • Legislation, particularly related to incentives
    and tax exemptions
  • Existence of qualified human resources and
    scientific know-how in the region
  • Existence of supporting research and higher
    education institutions
  • Sufficient financial resources to make the
    necessary investment
  • Entrepreneurship and business know-how in the
    region to convert the scientific studies into
    commercial products and services
  • Geographical factors such as the location of the
    park, as well as the local communitys social,
    cultural and economic status
  • Supporting governmental and non-governmental
    organizations
  • Demand for high technology and technological
    products in the region
  • Overall macro-economic situation of the
    country/region

20
FINANCIAL SUPPORT MECHANISMS FOR TECHNOPARKS AND
INCUBATORS IN TURKEY
  • Governmental aids through Ministry of Industry
    and Trade, for land acquisition, infrastructure
    and management building construction costs
  • World Bank credit to STPs by Industrial
    Technology Project through TTGV (only to
    Cyberpark, ARI technopark)
  • Other international credits and funds like World
    Bank InfoDev Incubator Initiative (Cyberpark
    Technology Incubator)
  • KOSGEBs support for TEKMERs

21
INCUBATORS IN TURKEY
  • Parallel to the poor entrepreneurial culture,
    incubation culture is too poor as well.
  • Currently available incubators (12) in Turkey,
    called TEKMERs (Technology Development Centers),
    are managed by KOSGEB (SME Development
    Organization), a governmental agency.
  • There is no private or PPP incubator except
    Cyberpark Technology Incubator which has been
    granted with 250,000 USD WB grant through InfoDev
    Incubator Initiative Program.
  • Only two TEKMERs are located in STPs and have tax
    incentive advantages.
  • Grants available for incubatees for many
    purposes, however access is relatively
    bureaucratic and limited.
  • Services provided by KOSGEB in TEKMERs are
    rapidly improving, but still an effective private
    or PPP model incubation is required.

22
MAIN CHALLENGES RECOMMENDATIONS
  • Insufficient know-how and best practices in STP
    management
  • Insufficient financial resources for land and
    institutional development (limited governmental
    support, need for international loans with
    favorable conditions, like from WB, EIB, etc.)
  • Need for support mechanism for private incubators
    (Knowledge Economy Project may reserve some funds
    for supporting private incubators.)
  • Need for effective RD finance mechanisms like
    seed or venture capital funds
  • Establishment of most of the STPs as land
    development projects
  • Poor Institutionalization, insufficient technical
    infrastructure and support services in existing
    STPs (absence of technology and business support
    mechanisms, incubators, consultancy on IPR,
    access to financial resources, etc.)
  • Need for being a Business Park before being a STP

23
MAIN CHALLENGES RECOMMENDATIONS
  • Wrong location selection for some STPs (absence
    of required RD and industrial capacity,
    insufficient scientific, technological, cultural
    and social infrastructure in the selected zone)
  • Need of more emphasis to modify the existing
    education system - education of academics to have
    more entrepreneurial skills
  • Requirement of an NGO to provide a platform for
    cooperation and best practice sharing (Turkish
    Science and Technology Parks Association)
  • Too much focus on ICT, need for attracting other
    technologies to have crosssectoral RD.
  • Need for other attraction elements, other than
    tax advantages, providing the permanent success
  • Need for implementing auto control mechanisms
    incentives are open to abuse!

24
MAIN CHALLENGES RECOMMENDATIONS
  • Requirement for special purpose STPs by
    considering regional capacities and priorities
    (Agroparks, mediparks, etc.)
  • Lacking synergies among different STPs and host
    universities (Most of the universities impose
    barriers for their academics to work in other
    universities science parks)
  • Need for funding of commercialization of RD
    studies
  • Need for promotion of collaborative studies
    international cooperations especially to direct
    funds to more relevant activities (like FP6)
  • Requirement for additional tax incentives to some
    crucial support organizations like venture
    capital funds
  • Importance of international recognition and
    attraction of FDI.

25
  • THANK YOU !

Cyberpark / Contact Information Tel (312) 265
00 40 Fax (312) 265 00 48 Address
Cyberpark Cyberplaza B Blok Kat 1 Bilkent
06800 ANKARA Web www.cyberpark.com.tr E-mail
info_at_cyberpark.com.tr
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com