Priming and Framing in the Public Agenda - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 11
About This Presentation
Title:

Priming and Framing in the Public Agenda

Description:

Last time: more Veto power models. Today: priming, framing and the public agenda ... in equilibrium, Congress overrides all vetoes ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:69
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 12
Provided by: brs6
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Priming and Framing in the Public Agenda


1
Priming and Framing in the Public Agenda
  • Last time more Veto power models
  • Today priming, framing and the public agenda

2
Odysseus and the Sirens
  • Model 2 presidential commitment
  • Hypothesis that president can credibly pre-commit
    to vetoing a bill, even if signing makes him
    better off
  • reduces asymmetry, but not subgame perfect in
    single-shot games
  • in equilibrium, Congress overrides all vetoes
  • suppose president and Congress can send signals
    to the audience the Going Public variant
    (president has asymmetric ability to prime/frame
    issues for the public, thereby affecting
    legislators induced preferences)

3
More veto models
  • Prez commitment model reduces asymmetry Cong.
    compelled to give prez more of what he wants,
    even when he is structurally disadvantaged how
    plausible?
  • Incomplete info models MCs have to guess what
    prez would accept
  • vetoes sometimes happen, and are never overridden
    in eq.
  • but MCs never intend to be vetoed
  • Blame Game bargaining before a moderate
    audience
  • assume president wishes to appear more moderate
    than his true preferences MCs want him to appear
    extreme actions entail audience costs
  • Cong Prez know each others prefs, but voters
    dont
  • Groseclose and McCarty model prez approval
  • prez taste for voter approval gives Congress
    leverage to do better than in the standard setter
    model when reversionary policy is bad, but
    favors the prez

4
Positive agenda power
  • can the president set the legislative table
    directly or indirectly?
  • Where does the president have unilateral ability
    to initiate policy change?
  • What shapes legislators policy agendas? I.e.,
    how are issues primed? Can the president affect
    the set of salient issues?
  • How do specific proposals get considered? I.e.,
    how are issues framed? Can the president affect
    the set of alternatives considered?

5
Constitutional authorities
  • Negotiate treaties (needs advise and consent of
    2/3 of senate)
  • Receive ambassadors
  • Commander in chief
  • Nominate judges, ministers, ambassadors,
    officers, high officials (needs majority of
    senate to appoint) and all other officials not
    otherwise provided for by law Fill vacancies
    during Senate recesses (temporary appointments)
  • Other action-forcing authorities
  • Require written opinions from principal officers
    of executive departments
  • Call Special Sessions of Congress Adjourn
    Congress when H and S cant agree on an
    adjournment date
  • Reprieves and Pardons for offenses against the
    U.S. not involving impeachment
  • Other constitutional authorities
  • Give periodic reports to Congress on State of
    Union
  • Take care that the laws are faithfully executed

6
Delegated authorities
  • Contingency funds
  • Reporting requirements (other than State o
    Union), e.g., the budget
  • Trade agreement authorities
  • Reorganization authorities
  • Impoundments recission authorities

7
What do legislators want? How can they get what
they want?
  • Goals
  • reelection
  • good public policy
  • career advancement
  • cost minimization
  • Strategies
  • advertising
  • position-taking
  • credit-claiming

8
When can the president set the legislative table
directly?
  • Legislators face a collective dilemma of who will
    do the hard work of writing policy proposals and
    trying to pull together a support coalition
  • Legislators face a further collective dilemma in
    how to solve distributive problems
  • Presidents have incentives to try to solve these
    dilemmas by offering entrepreneurial services
  • first-mover advantages when entrepreneurship and
    amendments are costly prez may get policy closer
    to what he most wants
  • credit-claiming and position-taking
    opportunities audience effects

9
Bicameral bargaining and presidents
  • Bicameral legislatures create the possibility of
    bargaining failures
  • 2-player bargaining games
  • relative bargaining strengths?
  • are there obvious solutions (Schelling focal
    point solutions)?

10
Presidential persuasion
  • Going public (external lobbying)
  • priming
  • framing
  • Insider lobbying
  • patronage campaigning support
  • persuasion

11
Can the president prime issues?
  • Jeffery Cohen article on State of the Union
    addresses
  • presidential mentions of an issue area are
    related to increased mentions of those issues by
    survey respondents (a priming effect)
  • prez popularity seems unrelated
  • leadership effects decay faster in domestic than
    in foreign policy arenas
  • no evidence of framing effects
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com