Title: Management Programs to Optimize Reproduction
1Management Programs to Optimize Reproduction
GL Stokka DVM,MS Pfizer Animal Health
2Quality
3Cow Production Costs
Medium Low High Calves weaned 87 83 90
Calf death loss 3.4 2.9 2.4 wean wt/cow
exposed 455 413 455 Costs Cost/cow/cwt
82 145 61 Health costs/cwt 4(5) 6(4) 3.
50(6) Calf breakeven/lb 0.69 1.36 0.41 ROA
2.88 -15.55 18.16
- SPA Northern herds
- Barry Dunn SDSU
4Health Costs
- Health Costs as of total maintenance cost of a
beef cow. - 15.00 to 25.00 (3.5 to 5)
5Cost of Production Targets
- 0.60/lb cost of producing a weaned calf.
- Health program costs 5 - 0.03/lb.
- One dollar difference/head assuming health costs
at 20/hd. 5 of 0.03 .0015.
6Management Decisions that Influence Profitability
Health
7Profitability Health
8Profitability Health
9Failure of passive transfer (FPT)
- Calves with inadequate immunoglobulin
concentrations at 24 hours of age were 3.2-9.5
times more likely to become sick and 5.4 times
more likely to die prior to weaning. - Levels lt800mg of IgG/dl are considered inadequate.
- Wittum TE, Perino LJ AJVR Sep. 1995
10Health and performance effects of inadequate
colostral transfer in beef calves
- Lower perinatal IgG1 levels were significantly
associated with higher morbidity, higher
mortality and lower gain in the preweaning
period. (plt0.5) - Calves with serum IgG1 levels up to 2500 mg/dl
were 1.5X more likely to get sick before weaning
and 2.4X more likely to die before weaning than
calves with higher IgG1 levels. - Calves with IgG1 levels of at least 2700 mg/dl
weighed 7.38 pounds more at 205 days of age than
calves with lower IgG1 levels. - Dewell, RD., Hungerford, LL., Keen, JE.,
Grotelueschen, DM., Rupp, GP., Griffin, DD., 2002
Proceedings AABP
11Risk of Disease
12Risk of Disease
13Vaccinology
14What is a Vaccine??
- Contains material originating from the disease
causing bug that can induce resistance
(immunity) to disease. - Vaccines work by stimulating the body to produce
- Antibodies
- Killer Cells
- Memory Cells
15IMMUNOLOGY PRINCIPLES
- INJECTION VACCINATION
- VACCINATION ? IMMUNIZATION
- IMMUNIZATION REQUIRES.
- a. Effective vaccine
- b. Immunocompetent animal
16IMMUNOLOGY PRINCIPLES
- for VACCINATION IMMUNIZATION, requires an
IMMUNE RESPONSE - IMMUNE REPONSE
- cognition
- activation
- effect
17(No Transcript)
18IMMUNOLOGY PRINCIPLES
- mounting an immune response is complicated
TAKES TIME - Immune response takes 3 to 10 days or longer to
kick in. Longer with naive animals. - Peaks in 2 to 4 weeks.
19Incubation and Protection
-
- IBR 3 days, protection 40 to 96 hours.
- BVD 5 days, protection 21 days .
- M. hemolytica 7 to 10 days, protection 14 days.
- Mycoplasma 12 days, protection 14 days
(doses?). - BRSV 5 days, protection 11 days.
- RBCV - ??
- Multiple references
20IMMUNOLOGY PRINCIPLES
Because of IMMUNOLOGIC MEMORY multiple doses
of vaccine SHORTEN THE TIME RAISE THE
IMMUNITY LEVEL AND INCREASE THE NUMBER OF
IMMUNE ANIMALS
21Challenge Level
High challenge
No or low challenge
Before Vaccination
After Vaccination
Susceptible
Non-Susceptible
With PI
22Individual Vaccination
- Induces protection against disease, i.e. clinical
signs. - Reduce susceptibility of an individual against
infection, infectious dose needed to establish
infection is higher after vaccination. - Reduces infectivity after the occurrence of an
infection.
23Herd Immunity
- Reduced probability of an individual becoming
infected when it is part of a vaccinated
population. - Chance of becoming infected in a population
decreases with increasing density of individuals
being vaccinated. - Prevent transmission of pathogen within the
population to such an extent that the infection
will eventually be controlled or become extinct. - Potgieter L., Immunology of Bovine Virus Diarrhea
Virus. November 1995 VCNA Vol 11 No 3 pp 501-520.
24Reproductive Rate(R)
- The spread of disease depends on the reproductive
rate (R, how many new cases arise on average from
one infectious animal) of an infectious disease
agent. - In general at the herd level, the basic
reproductive rate of the disease in vaccinated
populations should be below 1 to prevent the
spread of infection.
25Reproductive Rate
- The higher the R the greater the number of
animals that must be immune in order to prevent
spread of the infectious agent. If R in a
vaccinated population is larger than one, then
the vaccine cannot totally prevent the spread of
infection and other biosecurity principles must
be employed. - Noordhuizen, JPTM, Frankena, K, C.M. van der
Hoofd, E.A.M. Graat, in Application of
Quantitative Methods in Veterinary Epidemiology
Wageningen Pers, Wageningen, Netherlands 1997
pp249-269. - Hage, et al Vet Micro 53 (1996) 169-180.
26Herd Immunity
- Immunization for herd immunity against BVDV need
be 57 in herds without PIs. - 97 with PIs based on mathematical models.
- For IBR at least 86 of population must be immune
to reduce Ro to less than 1. - For PRV Ro 10. After vaccination 0.5.
- For Mannheimia? 12 marker calves spread to 10
others. - Cherry BR et al Prev Vet Med 1998
- Hage, et al Vet Micro 53 (1996) 169-180.
- De Jong, Kimman Vaccine 1994 761-766.
- Briggs, et al Am J Vet Res 1998 59401-405.
27IMMUNOLOGY PRINCIPLES
- PREEXPOSURE IMMUNIZATION
-
- REALISTIC EXPECTATIONS
- 1. Will rarely make disease rate zero
- 2. If disease rate is low, hard to see effect
28IMMUNOLOGY PRINCIPLES
- Challenge Dose
- Even a normally protective level of immunity can
be overwhelmed
29IMMUNOLOGY PRINCIPLES
- IMMUNIZATION REQUIRES.
- a. Effective vaccine
- b. Immunocompetent animal
30VACCINE MANAGEMENT FACTORS
- Vaccine Handling
- Temperature abuse
- Ultraviolet light (sunlight)
- Disinfectants
31Fetal Protection
32Fetal Protection
- IBR
- BVD
- Lepto
- Vibrio
- Trichomoniasis
- Neopsora
33Vaccinations for Fetal Protection
- Overview
- The anatomy of the bovine cow-fetal connection
(multilayered placenta) precludes antibodies and
other immune cells from crossing the placenta and
providing protection for the developing fetus - Thus the developing bovine fetus is susceptible
to small amounts of infectious agents (less than
1000 viral particles)
34Routes of Persistent Infection
Non-immune pregnant cow exposed to NCP BVDV
Persistently Infected calf
Persistently infected cow giving birth
35(No Transcript)
36BVD Transmission
- PI animals shed large amounts of virus.
- Excreted in smaller amounts from acutely infected
animals for only a few days. - Direct contact with PI most efficient mode.
- One hour of direct contact allowing nose-to-nose
contact was sufficient for transmission. - Direct contact with acutely infected can transmit
though less efficiently.
Houe, Vet Microbiology 1999
37Risk of transmission
- Between Herds
- Most commonly by PI animals introduced to herds.
- If prevalence is 2, risk of purchasing PI animal
in a group of 20 is 33. - P 1- probability of buying non PI animal. P
1 0.98n n number of animals purchased.
Houe, Vet Microbiology 1999
38Fetal protection claims for BVDV Vaccines
39Failure of foetal protection after vaccination
against an experimental infection with bovine
virus diarrhea virus
- Two inactivated BVDV vaccines were applied twice
within a 3 week interval. Challenge virus was
applied 5 months after completion of the
vaccination protocol. - All calves born from unvaccinates were born PI.
Six out of 9 calves were born PI with 1 calf
having pre-colostral antibodies from vaccine A.
Eight out of 15 calves were born PI with 2 calves
having pre-colostral antibodies from vaccine B. - Zimmer, GM., Wentink GH., Bruschke, FJ.,
Westenbrink, J., Brinkhof, J., de Goey, I. Vet
Micro 2002 Vol 89(4)255-265
40Failure of foetal protection after vaccination
against an experimental infection with bovine
virus diarrhea virus
- No relation between virus isolation from blood
and birth of PI calves. - No relation between titers after vaccination, on
day of challenge and birth of PI calves. - Challenge model must allow enough time for fetal
infection to occur, in this study several calves
born with active immunity indicating fetal
infection occurred at least 1 month after
challenge. Infection may have been delayed by
immune response of the vaccination. - Zimmer, GM., Wentink GH., Bruschke, FJ.,
Westenbrink, J., Brinkhof, J., de Goey, I. Vet
Micro 2002 Vol 89(4)255-265
41Foetal cross-protection experiments between type
I and type II bovine diarrhoea virus in pregnant
ewes
- Fetuses from ewes immunized with BVDV-1 were
protected when challenged with BVDV-2. - All fetuses were infected from ewes immunized
with BVDV-2 and challenged with BVDV-1. - Pre-challenge level of neutralizing antibody is
not a reliable indicator of fetal protection. - Paton, DJ., Sharp, G., Ibata, G., Vet Micro 1999
64 185-196.
42Modified live type bovine viral diarrhea virus
(BVDV) provides fetal protection against
challenge with a type 1 2 BVDV
- Type 1 Challenge
- One And two doses of NADL vaccine
- (PregGuard and Bovi-Shield)
- Challenge with 104.8 TCID 50 doses of
noncytopathic Type 1 BVD strain 816317,
administered IN, New York isolate calves taken to
term - 1/38 vaccinates had a PI calf
- 7/10 control calves born PI
- No difference between single or two doses
43Modified live type bovine viral diarrhea virus
(BVDV) provides fetal protection against
challenge with a type 1 2 BVDV
- Type 2 Challenge
- One And two doses of NADL vaccine
- (PregGuard and Bovi-Shield)
- Challenged with 1 X 103.9 TCID 50 doses of
noncytopathic BVD Type 2 virus strain 94B-5359a,
administered IN, Wyoming isolate calves taken to
term - 13/37 vaccinates had a PI calf
- 9/10 control calves born PI
- No difference between one and two doses
44Safety for Administering MLV to Calves Nursing
Previously Vaccinated Pregnant Cows
45Safety for Administering MLV to Calves Nursing
Previously Vaccinated Pregnant Cows
- Field Safety Studies in
- 1rst, 2nd, and 3rd Trimester Pregnant Animals
- Study Animals and Sites
- 1rst trimester pregnant beef cows in Leith,
North Dakota - 2nd trimester pregnant holstein heifers in
Hanford, California - 3rd trimester pregnant beef cows in
Medicine Lodge, Kansas
46Safety for Administering MLV to Calves Nursing
Previously Vaccinated Pregnant Cows
- Field Safety Studies in
- 1rst, 2nd, and 3rd Trimester Pregnant Animals
- Normal Calving Rates
- Study Controls (T1) Vaccinates (T2 T4)
- 1rst Trimester 99.2 (261 / 263) 99.6 (263 /
264) - 2nd Trimester 95.3 (225 / 236) 93.6
(220 / 235) - 3rd Trimester 99.3 (148 / 149) 99.5
(195 / 196) - Total 97.8 (634 / 648) 97.7 (679 /
695)
47Vaccines Fetal Protection
- Complete reproductive protection(BVDV) can not be
obtained from vaccination. IBR protection seems
strong - Do not over promise what vaccination can do.
- Incorporate vaccination with the other control
measures. - Biosecurity testing.
48Summary