3D, nonhydrostatic numerical simulation of nonlinear internal wave generation in the South China Sea - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 37
About This Presentation
Title:

3D, nonhydrostatic numerical simulation of nonlinear internal wave generation in the South China Sea

Description:

3D, nonhydrostatic numerical simulation of nonlinear internal wave generation in the South China Sea – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:58
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 38
Provided by: oliverf
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: 3D, nonhydrostatic numerical simulation of nonlinear internal wave generation in the South China Sea


1
3D, nonhydrostatic numerical simulation of
nonlinear internal wave generation in the South
China SeaOliver FringerCollaborator Steve
Ramp (MBARI) Ph.D. Student Zhonghua Zhang
Environmental Fluid Mechanics Laboratory
Stanford University, Stanford, CA10 June 2009
Support ONR grant N00014-05-1-0294
TexPoint fonts used in EMF. Read the TexPoint
manual before you delete this box. ??A?????
2
SCS NLIWI with SUNTANS
  • Resolution
  • 1 5 km horizontal
  • 10 150 m vertical
  • 12 million grid cells
  • Initial conditions
  • quiescent velocity
  • horiz. uniform stratificationfrom observations
  • Boundary conditions
  • Tidal currents from OTIS TPXO6.2
  • Bathymetry
  • 1800 m resolution Ocean Data Bank of the National
    Center for Ocean Research, Taiwan.
  • Simulation time
  • 14 days real 7 days wall on 64 procs11,000 cpu
    hours on ARL JVN/MJM

China
Taiwan
B1
500 x 300 km
3
Temperature field at a depth of 60 m (17-30 June
2005)
4
Free-surface signature
A
B
5
(No Transcript)
6
(No Transcript)
7
(No Transcript)
8
(No Transcript)
9
(No Transcript)
10
(No Transcript)
11
(No Transcript)
12
A
B
13
(No Transcript)
14
(No Transcript)
15
(No Transcript)
16
(No Transcript)
17
(No Transcript)
18
(No Transcript)
19
(No Transcript)
20
A
B
21
(No Transcript)
22
(No Transcript)
23
(No Transcript)
24
(No Transcript)
25
(No Transcript)
26
(No Transcript)
27
A
28
(No Transcript)
29
(No Transcript)
30
B1
31
A waves at B1
Observation (S. Ramp, MBARI)
Prediction
  • Good phase prediction, bad amplitude prediction
  • Bathymetry
  • Grid resolution

32
28 June 2005, 1220
27 June 2005, 1130
28 June 2005
B
A
30 June 2005, 1401
29 June 2005, 1311
Generation is strongly influenced by
three- dimensional topography.
Apparent sources inferred from wave fronts are
not aligned with sills in Luzon. A-wave
source is at 120.5oE.
33
Generation through superposition
34
Is the nonhydrostatic pressure necessary?
Nonhydrostatic code
Isotherms 16, 20, 24, 28 degrees C
Simulation time 2X
Hydrostatic code
Simulation time X
35
Nonhydrostatic effects
Hydrostatic
Nonhydrostatic
both at 1230 am on 25 Jun 2005
  • Nonhydrostatic simulation produces more realistic
    results because of the influence of
    nonhydrostatic dispersion which has a
    regularizing effect.

36
Comparison to SAR imagery
37
Summary
  • Apparent sources of waves may be a result of
    superposition of multiple wave fronts.
  • Phase is predicted well but this is due to
    accurate prediction of mostly linear phenomenon
    of internal tidal propagation in deep basin.
  • Onshelf propagation is more nonlinear and
    nonhydrostatic, and hence nonhydrostatic code
    produces more realistic dispersive behavior of
    waves on shelf.
  • Hydrostatic code will produce steeper waves that
    decay faster and hence have smaller amplitude
    may alter phase prediction by O(hours).
  • To predict peak amplitude of waves at B1 and
    onshelf, resolution of O(100 m) and better
    bathymetry are required.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com