2005%20NDIA/AAC%20Air%20Armament%20Symposium

1
2005 NDIA/AAC Air Armament Symposium
Long Range Strike Industry Panel Brief October 5,
2005
2
Long Range Strike Industry Panel
LibertyWorksTM
3
Panel Membership
Panel Chair Carl Avila Co-Chair Ed
Whalen Co-Chair Bob Nelson
Panel Advisors Marya Bard AAC/XR Ed
Jackanowski ASN/RDA

• Alliant Tech Systems
• Robert Blake
• Douglas Lewis
• Gordon Snurr
• Aerojet
• Mark Director
• Pat Hewitt
• Boeing
• Carl Avila
• Bob Marinan
• Carl Miller
• Steve Morrow
• Ron Mutzleburg
• John Reilly
• Glenn Vogel
• Steve Vukelich

• General Electric
• Bill Dwyer
• Honeywell
• Dan Shockley
• Liberty Works
• John Arvin
• Lockheed Martin
• Barry Brown
• Jim Enault
• Bob Hartmann
• Richard Mitchell
• Ed Whalen
• Northrop Grumman
• Gail Allen
• Russ Prechtl
• Dave Rosenblatt

• Orbital Sciences
• Kevin Richardson
• Pratt Whitney
• Richard Kazmar
• Raytheon
• Dave Andrews
• Louis Galto
• Robert Nelson
• Charles Stevens
• Rockwell Collins
• Nick Holoviak
• Ken Kato
• Williams International
• Mike Bak
• Scott Cruzen
• Carl Schiller

4
Long Range Strike Capability
USAF Next Generation Long Range Strike Study

• Objective
• Capability To Achieve Desired Effects Rapidly,
  Persistently, On Any Target, In any Environment,
  Anywhere, At Any Time
• Requirements
• Phase 1 Bomber Forces Upgrade
• Link -16 Connectivity, Stand Off, Precision,
  Radar, Targeting
• Phase 2 Field Mid-Term Strike Capability
• Range, Persistence, L/O, Speed, GIG
• Phase 3 Field Long Range Strike Capability
• Long Range, Persistence, L/O, Speed, GIG,
  Transformational Technologies

5
Potential missions/targets TCS, Relocatable
Targets, Fixed Targets, Counter-WMD, GWOT, HDBT,
SUW,
Global Strike Weapon(High Speed Weapon)
High Speed
Hypersonic
JCIDS
Mach Number
AoA
6
2
10
What it is A Weapon SYSTEM, NOT just a
speed/propulsion

• Target Set
• Launch Platform
• PK
• C4ISR ConOps
• Cost Analysis
• TRL Assessment

JOINTNESS/Funding
Potential launch platforms TacAir, Surface
Ships, Submarines, Bombers,
JCIDS
AoA
Notional Schedule
Milestone B
IOC?
MS B
Studies
RFP
SourceSel
//
FY
05
06
07
08
09
13
14
It all depends on the CAPABILITIES Required
6
Notional TCS Capabilities Triad
Sea Strike
Prompt Global Strike Weapons

• Long Range gt3000 nm
• Type Conventional ICBM / IRBM
• Large Warhead gt1000 lbs
• GW gt3000 lbs

Launch Platforms Silos, Heavy Bombers, SSGN
Platforms Subsonic/LOE Weapons
JHS Strike Tactical Weapon

• Stealth / Standoff Platforms
• Long Range (w/ tanking/support)
• Various POR/Cruise Weapons
• Various conventional payloads

• Medium Range XXX - XXX nm
• Speed Mach X
• Warhead XXX - XXX lbs
• GW XXXX lbs

Launch Platforms TACAIR, SSGN, SSN, CG/DDG
Launch Platforms B-2 F-117 Next-Gen
High-Speed Bombers CG/DDG SSN SSGN TACAIR
Fills Time Critical Warfighter Gap /
Multi-Mission Capable Allows Long Range Strike
in Direct Attack Timelines
7
LRS and HSW are System of Systems(Not Just a
Range or Speed)
POTENTIAL MISSIONS/TARGETS TIME CRITICAL,
RELOCATABLE, FIXED, COUNTER-WMD, GWOT, HDBT, SUW,
- -
POTENTIAL LAUNCH PLATFORMS TACAIR, MARITIME
PATROL, SURFACE SHIPS, SUBMARINES, BOMBERS, - -
SENSOR TO SHOOTER DELAY TIME
C4ISR
PLATFORMS
TIME OF FLIGHT
CURRENT AND FUTURE CARRIAGE CONSTRAINTS
DATALINK CONNECTIVITY
WEAPONS
UNIVERSAL ARMAMENT INTERFACE
IT ALL DEPENDS ON THE CAPABILITIES REQUIRED
8
Warfighters Stand OffTime Critical Requirement
9
Customers Desired Capabilities
USAF
USN

• Time Critical Strike
• Integrated Defense
• Theatre Ballistic Missiles
• Mobile/Moving Surface Targets.
• Limited "Deep" GS Against HVT
• CBRNE Defense
• Maritime CAS
• Fixed Targets
• Close Air Support
• Underground Facility

• Time Critical Strike
• Relocatable Targets
• GWOT/High Value Targets
• Counter-WMD
• Surface Warfare (SUW)
• Fixed Targets
• Naval Surface Fire Support
• Hard/Buried Targets

10
Analysis Process Derived System Characteristics
System Characteristics/TPM
System Attributes or Key Performance Parameters
Capability Needs Constraints
Payload Type/Size
Target Set
Lethality
Range
Compatibility
Launch Platforms
Block Speed
Effectiveness
C4ISR Targeting Performance
Probability of Survival
Survivability
Accuracy
Defensive Threat
Reliability
Reliability
Cost
Affordability
Acquisition Cost
Need Date
TRL
Technical Risk
11
Vehicle SizingPlatform and Configuration
Constraints
Propulsion Subsystem Candidates

• Solid Rocket
• Turbine
• Pulse Detonation
• Liquid Fuel Ramjet
• Solid Fuel Ramjet
• Variable Flow
• Ducted Rocket
• Dual Combustion
• Ramjet
• Scramjet

LAUNCH PLATFORM SIZE CONSTRAINTS

• TACTICAL FIGHTER AIR LAUNCH (F/A-18 E/F, JSF,
  F-16, F/A-22, F-15E)
• 194 IN. CONTAINER LENGTH FOR CV MAGAZINE
  ELEVATOR
• 1965 LB F/A-18 E/F ASYMMETRIC RECOVERY LIMIT
• - POTENTIALLY 2320 LB
• BOMBER, VLS/CLS (SSN, CG, DDG, SSGN)
• 22 IN. BY 22 IN. MK-41 VLS CANISTER CROSS
  SECTION
• 250 IN. LENGTH OVER ALL (WITH BOOSTER) BOMBER
• 3300 LB MISSILE WEIGHT LIMIT (USING MK-41 VLS
  CANISTER)
• 5000 LB FOR BOMBERS

• TACTICAL FIGHTER AIR LAUNCH (F/A-18 E/F, JSF,
  F-16, F/A-22, F-15E)
• 194 IN. CONTAINER LENGTH FOR CV MAGAZINE
  ELEVATOR
• 1965 LB F/A-18 E/F ASYMMETRIC RECOVERY LIMIT
• - POTENTIALLY 2320 LB
• BOMBER, VLS/CLS (SSN, CG, DDG, SSGN)
• 22 IN. BY 22 IN. MK-41 VLS CANISTER CROSS
  SECTION
• 250 IN. LENGTH OVER ALL (WITH BOOSTER) BOMBER
• 3300 LB MISSILE WEIGHT LIMIT (USING MK-41 VLS
  CANISTER)
• 5000 LB FOR BOMBERS

• TACTICAL FIGHTER AIR LAUNCH (F/A-18 E/F, JSF,
  F-16, F/A-22, F-15E)
• 194 IN. CONTAINER LENGTH FOR CV MAGAZINE
  ELEVATOR
• 1965 LB F/A-18 E/F ASYMMETRIC RECOVERY LIMIT
• - POTENTIALLY 2320 LB
• BOMBER, VLS/CLS (SSN, CG, DDG, SSGN)
• 22 IN. BY 22 IN. MK-41 VLS CANISTER CROSS
  SECTION
• 250 IN. LENGTH OVER ALL (WITH BOOSTER) BOMBER
• 3300 LB MISSILE WEIGHT LIMIT (USING MK-41 VLS
  CANISTER)
• 5000 LB FOR BOMBERS

• Subsystem Constraints
• Booster Required for Air Launch
• (All Require Boosters For Surface Launch)

Concept 1 190 Length 2320 lbs
Maximum Weight 20.4 Diameter Concept 2 250
Length 2320 -5500 lbs
20.4 Diameter
12
Target Set Considerations
LRS And HSW Must Address Traditional, Time
Critical and High Value Targets

• Traditional fixed targets
• Time Critical Targets
• Mobile Targets
• Moving Targets
• WMD, Chem, Bio
• HDBT

• No single vehicle/ordnance pairing does it all
• Delivery Vehicle Must Accommodate
• Ordnance Blast Frag, Submunitions,
• Penetrator, CBRNE
• Delivery accuracy

Payload and Range Requirements for Different
Target Sets Drive Vehicle Configurations
13
Payload and Accuracy
Target Type Payload HDBT MVR Hard
Med Soft 250 500 750 1000 DE SubMn Cluste
r
HDBT CBRNE, C2
SubMn 1000 750 500 250
Hard Bunker, Shelter
Med Runway, Bridge Armor
Soft Personnel, POL
CEP
SKR LLDL
GPS INS
HLDL
Good
Poor
Moderate
Todays Guidance Capability Satisfies Accuracy
Needs
Most Target Types At Risk With Smaller Warhead
14
Strike BattlespaceDefined by Missile Range vs
Time-of-Flight
Mach 3
Mach 4
Mach 5
Mach 6
Mach 6
Mach 6
1800
Mach 2
1400
Range To Target (nmi)
1000
Mach 1
600
Current Air/Surface Launch Tactical Strike
Capability
200
Time of Flight (min)
30
60
15
Long Range High-Speed Missile Improves Time-Range
Battlespace
Mach 3
Mach 4
Mach 5
Mach 6
1800
Mach 2
1400
Range To Target (nmi)
1000
Art of the Possible Air/Surface Launch
Long-Range Strike Capability
Mach 1
600
Current Air/Surface Launch Tactical Strike
Capability
200
Time of Flight (min)
30
60
16
High-Speed Missile System Range vs
Time-of-Flight Battlespace
Fly out designed for fuel load, speed, and
thermal
Mach 3
Mach 4
Mach 5
Mach 6
Mid-Term Technology
1800
Mach 2
1400
Near-Term Technology
Range To Target (nmi)
1000
Mach 1
600
In-Service Technology
200
Time of Flight (min)
30
60
17
Low Risk Vehicle Design Points Provide
Substantially Improved Battlespace
Mach 3
Mach 4
Mach 5
Mach 6
1800
Mach 2
1400
Range To Target (nmi)
1000
Near-Term Air/Surface Launch 2320-5500 lb
(Concept 2)
600
Near-Term Air/Surface Launch 2320 lb (Concept 1)
200
Time of Flight (min)
30
60
18
Warfighter Sensitivity to Speed
Initial Standoff Strike - Near-Peer Adversary
Asset Laydown
125
WeaponBlock Speed
100
75
5,000 ft/sec
Normalized Targets Engagable
2,500 ft/sec
Capabilities-Based Analysis
50
1,000 ft/sec
25
0
15
30
Sensor-to-Shooter Delay (min)
More Targets Reachable Before Hide Using
High-speed Long-range Weapon
19
Operations Research Models Long Range High-Speed
Strike Weapons Benefits
TCTs Time Critical Targets HSW High-Speed Weapon

Case 2
Baseline HSW
vs
.
Stationary TCTs

Case 1


Range 600
nm
Baseline

JDAM
Targets Stationary
TCTs


JSOW A
Platform Surface Launch


JSOW B

Paveway


Case 3
Maverick

Baseline HSW
vs
.
Stationary TCTs
JASSM


Range 600
nm

Tomahawk

Targets Stationary
TCTs


ERGM

Platform Surface LaunchAIR
Supersonic missile added to a baseline weapon set
to examine campaign level effect
20
High-Speed Long-Range Capabilities Achieve
Objectives Sooner
800
3. HSW, Stationary Targets, Air Surface
Platforms
600
400
Cumulative TCT Kills
2. High-Speed Weapon (HSW) Stationary
Target Surface Platform
200
1. Current Weapons
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Days of Campaign

• Air-launched Fast Weapons Showed The Most Benefit
  Due To High Sortie Rate
• Benefit Achieved Is A Shorter Campaign

21
Survivability is Altitude, Speed and Observable
Dependent
High
Excellent PS
Altitude
Stealth Driven Improvement
Low PS
Moderate PS
Good PS
Low
High
Low
Speed
22
Operational Availability

• Long Range Strike Weapons Will Be Highly Reliable
• Reliability Designed In and Verified in
  Development
• Wooden Round
• Reliability As a Key Performance Parameter
• Minimum Support Infrastructure

23
Technology Readiness Level (TRL) Flight Vehicle
Subsystems Focus
Generic Vehicle Architecture
BLUE Design/Development Materials/Processes
Readily Available Across Industry GREEN Focus
Investment to Attain TRL gt6/7 Target Set/Mach
Number Dependent

• System Integration
• Airframe
• - Structure
• - Control Surfaces
• - Thermal protection
• Guidance, Navigation, and Control
• - Guidance and Control Unit IMU Data Link
• - Actuators
• - Seeker/Radome/IR Dome as required
• Payload
• - Penetrator/Blast Frag /Thermobaric /Fuzing/
  Submunitions/Advanced Payloads
• Propulsion
• - Inlet/Flow Path
• - Fuel Liquid/Solid
• - Combustor/Turbine/Fuel Control

24
Propulsion Technology Readiness Levels
Fiscal Year
Concept 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18
Solid Rocket 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9
Supersonic Turbojet 6 6 6 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7
Liquid Fueled Ramjet 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9
Variable Flow Ducted Rocket 8 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9
Dual Combustion Ramjet 6 6 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7
Solid Fueled Ramjet 5 5 5 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6
SCRAMJET 6 6 6 6 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7
Pulse Detonation Engine 4 4 4 5 6 6 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7
LRS/HSW Considerations
Low ISP, Sizing Not Suitable
Many Examples of Operational Solid Rockets
RATTLRS/VAATE Adding Maturity
RATTLRS Flight Testing (M3-4)
VAATE Ground Testing (M4)
Mature, in Production
MA-31 Operational Use (M2.5-3.5)
Mature, in Production
GQM-163A Flights (M2.5) In Production
HyFly Adding Maturity
HyFly Flight Demo Program (M4-6)
No Govt. Funded Plans to Mature
Funding Limited Schedule to Mature
SED Flight Tests (M4.5-6.5)
NASA Wind Tunnel Tests
No Govt. Funded Plans to Mature
Propulsion Technology Supports FY-08 Program Start
25
Vehicle Concepts
SCRAMJET
Variable Flow Ducted Rocket
Dual Combustion RAMJET
Supersonic Turbo Jet
Liquid Fuel RAMJET
26
Notional Acquisition Program

• Constant Base Year 2005 Dollars
• SDD Period of Performance Oct 2007 thru Sept
  2012
• 50 Equivalent Test Units Delivered
• Production Quantity Assumed to be 4,000 Units
• Excludes Pre-SDD Concept / Technology Development
  Cost
• Assumes All Up Round no GFE Required for
  Production
• Excludes Government Program Office, Test
  Facility, and Support Costs
• Integration on one USAF and One USN platform

2016
2017
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2005
2006
2007
MS B
MS A
MS C
IOC
Ongoing Risk Reduction
System Design Development
DT / OT
Low Rate Production
Full Production
SDD Program 800-900 M AUPP 500-800 K
27
Summary and Recommendations
Summary

• High Speed, Long Range Weapons Have The Potential
  To Be A Significant Force Multiplier
• Technology Readiness of Critical Subsystems
  Supports FY-08 Program Start
• USAF and USN Studies are Addressing the Same
  Requirement
• Development Cost Consistent with Current
  Generation Weapons
• Strong, Competitive Industrial Base
• Establish Joint Requirements (JCIDS)
• Coordinate Government Planned AoAs in FY-06 (USAF
  USN)
• Conduct Program Cost Estimates to Support FY-08
  POM

Recommendations