Reading Research a guide to Writing Research - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 12
About This Presentation
Title:

Reading Research a guide to Writing Research

Description:

Knowing how to read a scholarly research article helps you as a writer. ... must win authority by skillfully reconstructing data, contextual features, and ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:21
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 13
Provided by: claire103
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Reading Research a guide to Writing Research


1
Reading Research - a guide to Writing Research
  • Prof Claire Woods
  • School of Communication

2
Reading a scholarly research article as a writer
  • Knowing how to read a scholarly research article
    helps you as a writer.
  • Always read an article as a writer.
  • An effective article or text considers the reader
    over the researchers shoulder.
  • You need to know what to look for - and therefore
    what to provide for your reader.

3
Research is
  • Research is a disciplined form of inquiry, the
    process of systematic investigation. Researchers
    study phenomena in a planned, step-by-step manner
    and report it so that other inquirers can
    replicate the process if they choose.(Frey,
    Botan, Friedman and Kreps,19923)

4
Introduction
  • Is the purpose of the article and of the
    research clearly explained?
  • Was the goal of the research to explore,
    describe, critique etc? Was the goal appropriate
    and justified?
  • Was the significance of the research made clear?
    How useful and to whom was the research?
  • (The points in these slides are drawn from Frey
    et al Interpreting Communication Research A Case
    Study Approach,Englewood Cliffs, N.J Prentice
    Hall,1992)

5
Review of Literature
  • Summarise what is known, unknown and perhaps
    controversial theoretical perspective current
    research gaps.
  • What theoretical perspectives? Was the theory
    explained appropriately?
  • Was the research reviewed adequate to give a good
    understanding of the topic? ( Enough details?
    Shows how the studies relate?)
  • Was the Lit review well organised -
    chronological, topic based,problem- solution ?
  • How is this an extension of previous research -
    does it fill a gap?

6
Research Questions or Hypotheses
  • Are these clearly expressed and appropriate to
    the topic?
  • Do the R Q or Hypotheses emerge logically from
    the review of literature?

7
Methods
  • Who or what has been studied and How?
  • Has the method - methodology and data gathering
    processes - been justified?
  • Is it appropriate? Is it systematic? Does it seem
    credible?reliable?

8
Results/Data/Findings
  • Straightforward reporting of findings- (little or
    no interpretation)
  • Were the data appropriate for answering the
    research questions?
  • Were the results presented in a clear and
    organised way? (Charts?Tables?)

9
Discussion- Conclusion
  • Interpretation of meaning and significance of the
    findings.
  • 4 goals to accomplish in this section -
  • Summarise and examine the results in light of
    research questions/theory/findings from previous
    research identify problems or limitationspropose
    the significance of the findings propose
    directions for further research.

10
Discussion - evaluating questions
  • Do the conclusions seem valid/credible?Has the
    case been argued well?
  • Have potential problems/limitations been
    identified/
  • Has the significance of the study been
    explained?How can the findings be used/applied?
  • Has the research proposed further
    directions/research?(The heuristic function)

11
Convincing the reader
  • The researcher must win authority by skillfully
    reconstructing data, contextual features, and his
    or her own observing- and experiencing self. The
    goal is to convince readers that what the study
    purports to be is in fact what it is. (T Lindlof,
    Qualitative Communication Research Methods, SAGE
    Publications, Newbury Park 1995 250)

12
The Goal a confident account
  • how to turn a littered research trail into a
    confident, authoritative narrative that tells
    what happened and what it means. (T Lindlof,
    Qualitative Communication Research Methods, SAGE
    Publications, Newbury Park 1995 145)
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com