Regulatory Considerations for - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 36
About This Presentation
Title:

Regulatory Considerations for

Description:

textCopyright (c) 1998 Hewlett-Packard Companydesc*sRGB IEC61966-2.1*sRGB ... Reference Viewing Condition in IEC61966-2.1,Reference Viewing Condition in ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:48
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 37
Provided by: simon142
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Regulatory Considerations for


1
Regulatory Considerations for Unconventional
Resource Development Ron Stefik, AScT Resource
Conservation Branch April 17 2009
2
Veteran of Government Service!
3
Overview
  • Horn River Regional Field Devonian shale gas
  • the play
  • Experimental Schemes
  • OGC Development Order
  • water disposal
  • Heritage Regional Field Triassic Montney tight
    gas
  • the play
  • OGC Development Order (proposed)
  • Unconventional Gas Regulatory Challenges

4
Horn River Basin Simplified Cross-section
SouthEast
NorthWest
T 135 C (275 F) Pi 38 MPa (5500 psi)
T 175 C (347 F) Pi 50 MPa (7250 psi)
Bank edge
higher silica
more calcareous
Slave Point Carbonate
Muskwa/Otter Park Shale
100 m
Depth 2500 m TVD
k 250 nD
0 - 50 m
Middle Devonian Carbonate
Keg River/ Pine Point Carbonate
50 m
Klua/Evie Shale
Carbonate platform (wet)
TOC 5.7 OGIP gt 500 Tcf (including Cordova
Embayment)
5
Horn River Basin
6
Horn River Experimental Schemes
  • Experimental Scheme approval allows
  • evaluation of production techniques.
  • methods that are untried and unproven in the
    particular
  • application.
  • OGC will introduce a detailed guide for making
    application.
  • approval area limited in size to near-term
    activity.

7
Horn River Experimental Schemes
  • 3-year confidentiality for all well data,
  • including production.
  • annual Progress Reports submitted.
  • a total of 64 Experimental approvals (many
    inactive)
  • 21 Horn River formation -
  • (Muskwa/Otter Park and/or Klua/Evie)
    shale.
  • 8 Maxhamish Lake/Liard Basin area -
  • Exshaw shale.

8
Unconventional Gas Resource Development
  • Premise
  • Central pad locations - multiple horizontal
    wells.
  • High well density.
  • Reservoir quality variation is gradational over
    long distances.
  • Significant core sampling.

9
Horn River Basin Development Scheme Approval
  • The OGC has worked with the industry Horn River
    Producers Group proposed order that covers
    multiple sub-surface issues.
  • minimum data gathering requirements.
  • area based on OGC field outline, updated
    quarterly.
  • applies to wells with objective of Muskwa/Otter
    Park
  • and/or Klua/Evie.
  • normal Well Authorization application and
    approval
  • process still applies.

10
Horn River Basin Development Scheme Approval
  • Drilling Samples
  • 1st well on pad
  • 5 m intervals from 50 m above shallowest
    reservoir,
  • usually Debolt - vertical well to TD, or
  • - horizontal well to
    KOP.
  • 10 m intervals in build and horizontal section.
  • Subsequent wells on a pad
  • sampling required on one well in each
    stratigraphic unit,
  • in each dominant direction.
  • exempt from sampling above KOP.
  • from KOP to TD at 10 m intervals.
  • submit proposed program to OGC,
  • contacted only if modification required.

11
Horn River Basin Development Scheme Approval
  • Logging
  • 1st well on pad, full OH logs
  • vertical well, to TD.
  • horizontal well, to point of resistance ( 60
    degrees).
  • neutron log to within 25 m of surface.
  • horizontal well, gamma ray log to TD.
  • Subsequent wells on a pad exempt, except for
  • minimum of gamma ray log (MWD / OH / cased hole)
  • from base of surface casing to TD.
  • submit proposed program to OGC,
  • contacted only if modification required.

12
Horn River Basin Development Scheme Approval
Example pad minimum data requirements
  • First well on pad
  • samples 5 m intervals, 10 m in build hz
  • full OH logs (point of resistance if hz)
  • neutron to 25m from surface
  • GR to TD
  • All other wells on pad
  • exempt from samples
  • full GR logs
  • (OH/cased/MWD)
  • One well in opposite direction
  • samples only below KOP
  • full gamma log (OH/cased/MWD)

13
Horn River Basin Development Scheme Approval
  • Reservoir pressure tests
  • Pi - minimum of 1 test per 4 km radius (measured
    from well head).
  • Exempt from annual pool testing.
  • Gas well deliverability tests
  • Exempt from absolute open flow (AOF) potential
    testing.
  • Gas analysis
  • samples from minimum of 2 wells/pad, during
    initial production year.
  • Note any additional tests or analyses require
  • report submission.

14
Horn River Basin Development Scheme Approval
Example pad minimum data requirements
  • Initial reservoir pressure
  • 1 test per 4 km radius, each formation

4 km
  • Gas analysis
  • 2 wells/pad, each formation
  • Annual reservoir pressure
  • all wells exempt
  • AOF test
  • all wells exempt

15
Horn River Basin Development Scheme Approval
  • Production
  • Muskwa/Otter Park Klua/Evie formations may be
    commingled.
  • written notification to OGC
  • intervals (separate UWIs for each formation).
  • production allocation factors (may base on h
    value).
  • BC-11 form for each UWI, when commence
    production.

16
Horn River Basin Development Scheme Approval
  • Good Engineering Practice (GEP)
  • As development expands beyond Experimental
    Schemes,
  • operators are expected to apply for GEP
    approvals.
  • removes well spacing and target area
    restrictions for
  • a specific area.
  • streamlined application requirements -
    ownership or
  • consent from registered owner of petroleum
    and
  • natural gas rights essential.
  • gas target buffer distance of 100 m (normal is
    250 m).
  • notice of application posted OGC website for
    3-week period,
  • allow possible objections to be filed.

17
Horn River Field Water Disposal
  • Application required for Produced Water Disposal
    to an
  • underground formation.
  • Normally for by-product salt water disposal
    (SWD).
  • Approvals issued under Section 94 of the
    Drilling and Production
  • Regulation include by definition produced
    water or recovered
  • fluids from a well completion or workover.
  • Slick water fracs, significant volumes of
    flow-back water.
  • OGC encourages re-use of this water where
    possible.

18
Horn River Field - Water
water disposal ( source?) well
production well
Current water source surface lakes
ground level
Fresh water lt1,000 PPM TDS
Possible Quaternary gravel channel sources?
Debolt formation (water saturated)
400 m depth
20,000 PPM TDS
Deep formation water 30,000 100,000 PPM
TDS (seawater 35,000 PPM)
Horn River shale
2500 m depth
19
Horn River Field Water Disposal
  • Application required for initial injection test,
    OGC guideline.
  • Conditional Injection Test approval (if zone
    favourable)
  • specify test injection volume.
  • production test, verify no hydrocarbon
    potential.
  • OGC posts public notice (web site) to begin
    objection period.
  • if injection test successful, and 3 week
    objection
  • period concluded without valid concern, final
    approval.

20
Heritage Regional Field Montney A Simplified
Cross-section
West (Groundbirch)
East (Swan Lake)
36 miles
Doig ss Doig Phosphate shale
(variable presence and prouctivequality)
increasing pressure gradient to west
Pi 21 MPa
Pi 38 MPa
130 m
Upper Montney
Avg Depth 2400 m TVD
generally poorer quality to west
fine silt / shale
fine sand / silt
(overpressured)
170m
Lower Montney
Belloy carbonate
OGIP 87 Tcf ( 250 Tcf in fairway?)
21
Heritage Montney A
875 miles2 OGIP 87 Tcf
Good Engineering Practice (GEP) approvals. - No
inter-well spacing or horizontal drilling
restrictions.
22
Heritage Montney Production
23
Heritage Montney Development Scheme Approval
  • OGC has drafted an area based order, similar to
    Horn River sub-surface issues.
  • minimum data gathering requirements.
  • defined area Heritage regional field, updated
    quarterly.
  • wells with objective of, or completion within,
    Triassic
  • Montney formation.
  • normal Well Authorization application and
    approval process
  • still applies.

24
Heritage Montney Development Scheme Approval
Sneak Preview
25
Heritage Montney Development Scheme Approval
  • Drilling Samples
  • 1st well on pad
  • 5 m intervals from 50 m above shallowest
  • anticipated reservoir - vertical well to TD, or
  • - horizontal
    well to KOP.
  • 10 m intervals in build and horizontal section.
  • Subsequent wells on a pad
  • sampling required on one well in each
    stratigraphic unit,
  • in each dominant direction.
  • exempt from sampling above KOP.
  • below KOP at 10 m intervals.
  • submit proposed program to OGC,
  • contacted only if modification required.

26
Heritage Montney Development Scheme Approval
  • Logging
  • 1st well on pad, full OH logs
  • vertical well, to TD.
  • horizontal well, to point of resistance ( 60
    degrees).
  • this may be waived where adequate logged
    wells
  • within 250 m!
  • neutron log to within 25 m of surface.
  • horizontal well, gamma ray log to TD.
  • Subsequent wells on a pad exempt, except for
  • minimum of gamma ray log (MWD / OH / cased hole)
  • from base of surface casing to TD.
  • submit proposed program to OGC,
  • contacted only if modification required.

27
Heritage Montney Development Scheme Approval
  • Reservoir pressure tests
  • Pi - minimum of 1 test per 4 km radius (measured
    from well head).
  • Exempt from annual pool testing.
  • Gas well deliverability tests
  • Exempt from absolute open flow (AOF) potential
    testing.
  • Gas analysis
  • sample from minimum of 2 wells/pad, during
    initial production year.
  • Note any additional tests or analyses performed
  • require report submission.

28
Heritage Montney Development Scheme Approval
  • Production
  • Montney is treated as a single formation for the
    purpose
  • of production reporting.
  • commingling approval/notification not required
  • for Upper/Middle/Lower Montney zones.
  • not separate UWIs for each completion event.
  • single BC-11 form when commence production.

29
Heritage Montney Development Scheme Approval
  • Good Engineering Practice (GEP)
  • Numerous GEP approvals have been granted,
  • to multiple operators.
  • removes well spacing and target area
    restrictions for
  • a specific area.
  • streamlined application requirements -
    ownership or
  • consent from registered owner of petroleum
    and
  • natural gas rights essential.

30
Heritage Montney Development Scheme Approval
  • Good Engineering Practice (GEP)
  • gas target buffer distance of 150 m (normal is
    250 m).
  • buffer distance may be reduced lt 150 m where
  • consent from off-setting rights owners
    submitted.
  • where GEP has not yet been approved, 150 m
  • target area buffer applies to individual gas
  • spacing areas.
  • Notice of application posted OGC website for
    3-week
  • period, to allow possible objections to be
    filed.

31
Regulatory Challenges Optimal Well Spacing
  • Impact of well spacing and sequence of
    stimulation/production on ultimate recovery.
  • Ideal distance (lateral and vertical) between
    horizontal
  • well bores for drainage?
  • In-fill drilling and stimulation possible if
    intersect fractures
  • from off-setting producing well?
  • Regulator to require specific density and
  • order of operations?

32
Regulatory Challenges Acid Gas Disposal
  • Horn River gas C02 10
  • Montney gas H2S 0.0 - 0.3
  • Large production volumes large disposal
    requirements!
  • Acid gas disposal wells
  • Heritage Montney gt Belloy aquifer
  • 1 approved
  • max rate of 62 103m3/d.
  • observation well required.
  • 2 other applications received.
  • Horn River gt Devonian aquifer?

33
Regulatory Challenges - Trespass
  • Fracture stimulation consideration?
  • Regulation currently addresses horizontal
    trespass of
  • a wellbore (spacing areas).
  • Large frac treatments, possible to connect to
    formations
  • above or below title interest.
  • Regulator to limit horizontal well placement?
  • X meters from top or base of zone?
  • formula limiting frac size, based on distance
    from
  • top or base of zone?
  • Off-target production penalty formula is based
    on
  • interpretation of pay section.
  • In unconventional gas, what is pay?

34
Regulatory Challenges Microseismic Data
  • Seismic data, or enhanced completion data?
  • Not seismic data/reports for land tenure
    purposes.
  • If completion data,
  • must submit to regulator,
  • released 3 months to 3 years from rig release
  • date, depending on well classification.
  • File data with the well being observed/fraced,
  • not the well in which signals are received.

35
Summary
  • Two proposed Development Approvals for
    unconventional resources
  • capture the right amount of data for
  • evaluation and development
  • streamlining for industry and the regulator
  • challenges/opportunities remain

36
Victoria Housing Market - Now More Affordable
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com