Class 13: Perpetuities, then Co-ownership - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 22
About This Presentation
Title:

Class 13: Perpetuities, then Co-ownership

Description:

Unlike a Joint Tenancy, cannot be severed except by divorce or agreement between H and W. ... in common, but decrees that A's share of the whole is while B ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:54
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 23
Provided by: LLS1
Learn more at: https://webdb.lls.edu
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Class 13: Perpetuities, then Co-ownership


1
Class 13 Perpetuities, then Co-ownership
  • Property Law
  • Fall 2006
  • Professor Petherbridge

2
Overview
  • The Rule Against Perpetuities
  • Co-ownership and Concurrent Interests

Petherbridge
3
RAP Reform
  • Cy Pres (reformation)
  • Wait and see
  • Uniform Statutory Rule Against Perpetuities
    (USRAP)
  • Use most favorable of
  • RAP
  • Wait and see if actual vesting occurs within some
    defined period of time

Petherbridge
4
Rule Against Perpetuities
  • No interest is good unless it must vest, if at
    all, not later than twenty-one years after some
    life in being at the creation of the interest.

Petherbridge
5
Rule Against Perpetuities
  • No interest is good unless it must vest, if at
    all, not later than twenty-one years after some
    life in being at the creation of the interest.

Petherbridge
6
No interest is good . . .
  • Rule Against Perpetuities Applies to . . .
  • Contingent Remainders
  • Vested Remainders subject to open (to partial
    divestment i.e., class gifts)
  • Executory Interests

Petherbridge
7
Rule Against Perpetuities
  • No interest is good unless it must vest, if at
    all, not later than twenty-one years after some
    life in being at the creation of the interest.

Petherbridge
8
. . . must vest, if at all . . .
  • Generally, to vest usually means to become
    possessory. An exception may lie when there are
    two consecutive contingent remainders.
  • Contingent Remainders must vest or fail to vest
  • Executory interests must become possessory
  • Vested remainders subject to open must close (the
    class) or completely vest.

Petherbridge
9
Rule Against Perpetuities
  • No interest is good unless it must vest, if at
    all, not later than twenty-one years after some
    life in being at the creation of the interest.

Petherbridge
10
. . . not later than twenty-one years after some
life in being at the creation of the interest.
  • The future interest must VEST or FAIL TO VEST
    (usu. must become possessory), within a period
    calculated by adding twenty-one years to the end
    of the lives of the people alive (lives in
    being) at the creation of the interest.
  • If the interest does not necessarily VEST or FAIL
    TO VEST within this period, the interest is VOID.
  • Where the interest is VOID, it is eliminated from
    the conveyance.

Petherbridge
11
O conveys to Homer for life, then to Homers
first child to reach the age of 21 and his/her
heirs. Homer has three children, Bart 13, Lisa
11, and Maggie 2.
  • State the Title
  • H has a life estate Hs first child to reach the
    age of 21 has a contingent remainder in fee
    simple absolute O has a reversion.
  • RAP?
  • Apply to contingent remainder. Interest is
    VALID.
  • Create, Kill, Count
  • Create Homerson, an afterborn child who could
    take the interest.
  • Kill, Homer, Bart, Lisa, and Maggie
  • Count 21 years. Is it possible that Homersons
    interest could vest after 21 years?
  • No.
  • Homer is the validating life Homers death
    causes the vesting of the interest.

Petherbridge
12
Robert conveys to Colin for life, then to
Colins children for their lives, then to the
children of Lazarus then living. Lazarus has a
son aged 20 and a daughter aged 10.
  • State the Title
  • C has a life estate Cs children have a
    contingent remainder in life estate the children
    of Lazarus then living have a contingent
    remainder in fee simple absolute.
  • RAP?
  • First remainder, VALID
  • Second remainder, VOID
  • Create, Kill, Count
  • X a child of C and Y a child of L
  • Kill everyone
  • Count 21 years. Is it possible that Ys interest
    could vest after 21 years?
  • Yes. X could die after 21 years from when we
    killed everyone, in which case Ys interest would
    vest too late.

Petherbridge
13
Tammy testatrix devises to Alfred for life, then
to Alfreds grandchildren.
  • State the Title
  • Alfred has a life estate Alfreds grandchildren
    have a contingent remainder in fee simple
    absolute Ts estate has a reversion.
  • RAP?
  • VOID.
  • Create, Kill, Count.
  • X a child of A Y a child of X (an afterborn
    grandchild)
  • Kill everyone
  • Count 21 years. Is it possible that Ys interest
    could vest after 21 years?
  • Yes. X could die after 21 years from when we
    killed everyone, in which case Ys class would be
    open until too late (i.e., X could have more
    grandchildren after 21 years).

Petherbridge
14
Co-ownership
  • In this section, we will concern ourselves with
    three forms of concurrent interests
  • The Tenancy in Common
  • The Joint Tenancy
  • The Tenancy by the Entirety

Petherbridge
15
Prob 1, page 278. O conveys Blackacre to A, B,
and C as joint tenants. Subsequently, A conveys
his interest to D. Then B dies intestate,
leaving H as an heir.
  • What is the state of the title?
  • After As conveyance, D is a tenant in common
    with B and C, who remain joint tenants.
  • D has an undivided 1/3 interest as a tenant in
    common with B and C
  • B and C are joint tenants of an undivided 2/3
    interest as joint tenants
  • After Bs death?
  • D has an undivided 1/3 interest as a tenant in
    common with C, and C owns an undivided 2/3
    interest as a tenant in common with D.
  • What if B instead died leaving a will devising
    his interest to H?
  • Will conveys no interest. In law, Bs interest
    dies (disappears) with B. Only the survivors
    interest (here C) remains.

Petherbridge
16
Tenancy in Common
  • General Features
  • Separate but undivided shares in the property
  • Each owner has a distinct share
  • Each owner has a right to possess the whole
    property
  • The interest is transferable, devisable,
    inheritable
  • E.g., O conveys Blackacre to A and B and their
    heirs.
  • A and B are tenants in common in fee simple
    absolute.
  • If A sells his share to C, then C and B are
    tenants in common.
  • If B then dies intestate, leaving an heir, H. C
    and H are tenants in common.

Petherbridge
17
Joint Tenancy
  • General features
  • Primary feature is the right of survivorship
  • Each owner owns a distinct share, but also owns
    an undivided whole
  • Each owner has the right to possess the whole
    property
  • The interest is transferable, (with consequences,
    but not devisable or inheritable)
  • E.g., O conveys Blackacre to A and B and their
    heirs as joint tenants, not tenants in common.
  • A and B are joint tenants in fee simple absolute.
  • If B dies intestate, leaving an heir, H. A alone
    owns a fee simple absolute
  • Alternatively, if B sells his share to C, then C
    and A become tenants in common.

Petherbridge
18
Tenancy by the Entirety
  • General Features
  • Like a Joint Tenancy, but between a H and W.
  • Unlike a Joint Tenancy, cannot be severed except
    by divorce or agreement between H and W.
  • Cannot be conveyed by either H or W except
    together by H and W.
  • Neither can seek partition.

Petherbridge
19
Prob 2, page 278. T devises Blackacre to A and
B as joint tenants for their joint lives,
remainder to the survivor.
  • State the Title?
  • A and B have joint life estates the survivor has
    a contingent remainder in fee simple.
  • Are A and B joint tenants or tenants in common?
  • Tenants in common there is no right of
    survivorship the estate ends with the death of
    either A or B.
  • In a joint tenancy, A or B could destroy the
    right of survivorship unilaterally, by conveying
    their interest to a third party. Here that
    cannot be done.

Petherbridge
20
Prob. 3, page 278. A and B are planning to be
married. Two weeks before the ceremony, they buy
a house taking title in A and B as tenants by
the entirety. Several years after the marriage,
A leaves, conveying his interest to his brother
C. C brings an action to partition. What
result?
  • Did the conveyance create a tenancy by the
    entirety?
  • No. Too early.
  • Is the interest a joint tenancy or tenancy in
    common?
  • Probably a JT, the use of tenants by entirety
    shows the intent to create a right of
    survivorship
  • However, C will still be able to get partition.

Petherbridge
21
O conveys to A, B, and C as joint tenants with a
right of survivorship, and not as tenants in
common, but decrees that As share of the whole
is ½ while B and C each have ¼ shares. Is a
joint tenancy created?
  • At common law, no. No unity of interest.
  • Rule for this class Nowadays, a majority of
    jurisdictions will allow this at the creation of
    the interest. Everyone has the right of
    survivorship, but in the event of partition, the
    property is divided up according to the shares.

22
END
Petherbridge
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com