CognitionCentered Constructivistic Program of Instruction C3PI for Combat Mission Preparation Presen - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 24
About This Presentation
Title:

CognitionCentered Constructivistic Program of Instruction C3PI for Combat Mission Preparation Presen

Description:

Dr. Shawn Burke (Consultant) Dr. ... Dr. Bob Nullmeyer. 4. Background ... processing (Morris, Bransford, and Franks, 1977), similarities in the cognitive ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:39
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 25
Provided by: jenniferf152
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: CognitionCentered Constructivistic Program of Instruction C3PI for Combat Mission Preparation Presen


1
Cognition-Centered Constructivistic Program of
Instruction (C3PI)Presentation to the DoD
Human Factors TAG13 May 2003
2
Subtitle Enhancing Adaptive Performance through
the Application of Tactical Standards
3
C3PI Project Team
  • CHI Systems, Inc.
  • Dr. Jerry Owens (Project Manager)
  • Dr. Jennifer Fowlkes (Principal Investigator)
  • Dr. Kelly Neville
  • Mr. Jack Ennis
  • Ms. Susan Eitelman
  • Dr. Shawn Burke (Consultant)
  • Dr. Eduardo Salas (Consultant)
  • TRW
  • Jerry Childs
  • AFRL Warfighter Training Research Division
    (AFRL/HEA)
  • Ms. Anna Castillo
  • Dr. Bob Nullmeyer

4
Background
  • Adaptive performance is required for successful
    mission execution
  • Warfighters operate in complex, ill-structured,
    and time-pressured environments
  • A peer adversary has been replaced by multiple,
    asymmetric threats
  • Opponent tactics are harder to anticipate because
    of the lack of well-defined templates for modern
    adversaries

5
Background
  • Although there is a premium on enhancing adaptive
    performance in warfighting teams, rarely is this
    construct explicitly trained
  • Howeverthere is a growing body of research for
    enhancing adaptive performance that can be used
    to support the development of intelligent,
    interactive training systems
  • Much of this research focuses on activities
    related to planning and preparation

6
C3PI Objective
  • Demonstrate tactical standards using multimedia
    presentations, enabling aircrew to better
    understand and apply their standards across a
    range of tactical situations

Tactical standard Common baseline for air-to-air
operations founded on AFTTP 3-1 and refined at
the squadron level predictable methodology for
enhancing combat teams execution speed,
decision purity, and lethality in time critical
radar missile environments. Disciplined and
focused teamwork ensures mission success and
keeps you alive.
7
Relationship to CRM
  • Adaptive performance epitomizes exceptional team
    coordination
  • Much of crew coordination is encapsulated into
    tactical standards
  • Emphasis on the relation of planning and
    preparation to execution performance

8
Anticipated Uses
  • Educate personnel on squadron standards
  • Bring squadron standards to life, presenting
    air-to-air tactics integrated with
    communications. Scenarios will run in real time,
    showing responses (e.g., comms, commits,
    targeting, sorting, positioning) of each of the
    members of a 4-ship in response to threat
    presentations (or other contingencies such as
    losing a radar).
  • Enhance mission briefings and debriefings
  • Scenarios can be selected and used for briefing
    and debriefing. These can be paused for
    interactive discussions, for example, to
    determine whether aircrews understand their roles
    during the mission, comms that are expected, how
    the game plan can be applied to a particular
    tactical situation, and so forth.
  • Training
  • Training features of C3PI can be used to
    challenge aircrews in their understanding of how
    tactical standards apply to various situations.
    C3PI can show the students response compared to
    other tactically acceptable responses. In
    addition, students can access expert advice to
    enhance their understanding of the rationale
    underlying tactical standards.

9
C3PI Development Tasks
  • System Definition
  • CTA Research
  • Functional Requirements
  • Instructional Content

Systems Engineering
Software Engineering
Software Implementation
Delivery Evaluation
10
Development Approach
11
C3PI Concept
12
(No Transcript)
13
(No Transcript)
14
(No Transcript)
15
(No Transcript)
16
(No Transcript)
17
C3PI Underlying Training Theory
  • Principles for Advanced Learning
  • Acquisition of Acceptable Methods
  • Mental Simulation

18
Principles of Advanced Learning(adapted from
Feltovich et al., 1993)
  • Provide direct challenges to misconceptions
    likely to be held by trainees
  • Do not oversimplify. Utilize means to help
    students deal with the real complexity of things
    more tractably
  • Engage students in an active way. Students
    should be encouraged to manipulate and use the
    knowledge they are acquiring
  • Utilize numerous cases in instruction
  • Emphasize relations among cases and between cases
    and concepts
  • Encourage the adoption of multiple perspectives,
    and the use and representation of knowledge in
    multiple ways

19
CTA Approach
Previous Work
Phase I Limited CTA
SMEs
Identify Misconceptions among Novices
Test for These with Larger Group Item Analysis
Approach
Emphasize Difficult areas in C3PI Training
20
Acquisition of Acceptable Methods
  • Shalin et al. (1997) suggest that in real world,
    dynamic, risky environments, spontaneous human
    adaptability is complemented by the use of
    acceptable methods.
  • Rather than emphasizing the responsiveness of
    human behavior to immediate experience, we
    emphasize the influence of knowledge on the
    execution of actions in these domains in the form
    of pre-determined, accepted methods..

21
Mental Rehearsal
  • Experts naturally use imagery-rich mental
    simulation to support problem solving (Clement,
    1994)
  • Research (Driskell et al. 1994 Perry, 1939)
    suggests that mental rehearsal can be used to
    enhance performance and maintain skill levels,
    especially for cognitive skills
  • According to transfer appropriate processing
    (Morris, Bransford, and Franks, 1977),
    similarities in the cognitive processing required
    through mental simulation with the processing
    required by the actual task should result in
    positive transfer

22
Benefits/Payoffs
  • Enhanced understanding and application of
    tactical standards
  • Permit aircrews to develop accurate expectations
    of one anothers performance
  • Improved team performance in dynamic environments

23
Conclusions
  • Operational Relevance
  • Training Value
  • Theoretical Grounding
  • Research Opportunities

24
Questions
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com