HCAL Readout and DAQ using the ECAL Readout Boards - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 17
About This Presentation
Title:

HCAL Readout and DAQ using the ECAL Readout Boards

Description:

Aim for single crate (or at least a single DAQ PC) if possible ... Particularly if single VME crate ... VME slots in the crate for beam monitoring readout. Use ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:27
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 18
Provided by: pauld182
Category:
Tags: daq | ecal | hcal | boards | crate | readout | using

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: HCAL Readout and DAQ using the ECAL Readout Boards


1
HCAL Readout and DAQ using the ECAL Readout Boards
  • Paul Dauncey
  • Imperial College London, UK

2
ECAL readout electronics overview
  • CALICE ECAL has 30 layers, 18?18 channels/layer,
    9720 total
  • Each gives analogue signal, 14-bit dynamic range
  • Very-front-end (VFE) ASIC (Orsay) multiplexes 18
    channels to one output line
  • VFE-PCB handles up to 12 VFEs (216 channels)
  • Cables from VFE-PCBs go directly to UK VME
    readout boards

3
VFE-PCB control and timing
VFE-PCB needs several control and timing signals
  • Analogue 12 differential input, 2 differential
    output from readout board
  • Digital 4 LVDS input, 9 LVDS output from readout
    board, plus 7 uncommitted LVDS spares (could be
    in or out assume out here)

4
Readout board overview
  • Readout board structure
  • Front End (FE) FPGA controls all signals on
    VFE-PCB cable
  • Back End (BE) FPGA gathers and buffers all event
    data from FE and provides interface to VME
  • Trigger logic in BE for timing and backplane
    distribution only active in one board
  • First readout board prototypes this summer, final
    boards end 2003 cost per board 10k

5
Readout board features
  • Board clock 40 MHz
  • Almost all signals edges timed to 25ns periods
  • Sample-and-hold timing needs to be better than
    10ns
  • Effectively the VFE-PCB trigger VFE shaping time
    of 180ns sets maximum trigger latency also
  • Fine-tune rising edge of signal on ?8 clock, 3ns
    steps
  • Each cable can be timed independently
  • Dual 16-bit ADCs and 16-bit DAC
  • DAC fed back for internal as well as VFE
    calibration
  • No data reduction planned in hardware
  • Read out all ECAL channels for every event
  • 2 Bytes ? 1728 channels/board 3.5 kBytes/board
  • 2 Bytes ? 9720 channels 19 kBytes total
  • On-board buffer memory 8 Mbytes
  • Allows up to 2k events for ECAL during beam spill

6
Trigger/DAQ logic
Idea is to implement trigger/DAQ interface for
all subsystems
7
Trigger handling
  • Multiple (4) trigger and activity (background)
    inputs
  • Can be enabled and disabled through VME
  • Need clean events with no pile-up
  • Activity prevents subsequent triggers within
    configurable time period
  • Trigger records following activity read out with
    event
  • Trigger latches off logic, preventing further
    triggers
  • Reset through VME single reset for system so no
    synchronisation issues
  • Trigger is fanned out and sent to backplane
    connector
  • Distribution to other boards in crate using
    custom cable
  • Point-to-point LVDS (probably)
  • Trigger also configurably delayed and output to
    connector
  • For distribution to other systems (beam
    monitoring, HCAL?)
  • Assuming 16 outputs, LVDS we have a LVDS?NIM
    converter available
  • Beam on signal allows buffering during spill,
    readout after spill

8
Motivations for reuse of readout boards
  • We have tried to keep design flexible enough to
    allow readout boards to be used for HCALs also
  • Assuming the on-detector electronics is
    compatible
  • Aim for single crate (or at least a single DAQ
    PC) if possible
  • No need for inter-PC communication
  • Single VME interface reduces amount of code
    needed
  • Makes offline analysis more uniform for different
    HCALs also
  • Trigger use and distribution is more uniform
  • Particularly if single VME crate
  • Common buffering method if not reading every
    event before next trigger
  • One downside may be less flexibility during
    testing before beam
  • (Semi-)custom 9U crate (CMS tracker
    standard)would need to buy specific crate for
    tests 6k
  • Is rate high enough with single VME crate? See
    later

9
Use for analogue HCAL
  • Tile AHCAL has 1500 analogue channels (AFAIK)
  • Each ECAL readout board has 96 ADCs 16 boards,
    need 2 crates
  • Multiplex AHCAL to fit into smaller number of
    boards?
  • E.g. 8-fold multiplexing could fit into two
    readout boards
  • Are systems compatible?
  • Can something like twelve (multiplexed) signals
    be fed into each cable?
  • Is multiplex control compatible with number of
    LVDS signals available?
  • What is maximum allowed trigger latency for
    AHCAL?
  • Are ADC input, DAC output ranges compatible?
  • Trivial if using (slightly modified) VFE chip
  • But who is designing equivalent of VFE-PCB?
  • Otherwise would probably need (non-UK) firmware
    development
  • FE FPGA only rewrite cable signal handling, keep
    BE interface
  • BE and VME would be identical retains common VME
    interface

10
Use for digital HCAL
  • Digital HCAL has 350k channels (AFAIK)
  • Assume zero suppression, as data volume otherwise
    is high (45 kBytes/event), and data concentrator
    on detector
  • Use LVDS lines for clock, trigger, configuration,
    control and data readout of concentrator
  • What is maximum allowed trigger latency for
    DHCAL?
  • Clearly requires FE firmware development, as for
    AHCAL
  • But BE and VME are still uniform across system
  • Are the number of lines compatible with
    concentrator interface?
  • Minimum would be clock, trigger, serial in,
    serial out per concentrator
  • Each cable could handle 4 concentrators, i.e. 12
    outputs, 4 inputs per readout board, so each
    readout board handles 32 concentrators
  • E.g. with 1k channels per concentrator, see talk
    by Gary Drake Feb 6, this requires 11 readout
    boards (What sets number of channels per
    concentrator?)
  • Leaves three free VME slots in the crate for beam
    monitoring readout

11
Transfer rates to readout board
  • ECAL
  • 18 channels multiplexed per line all lines read
    in parallel
  • ADC maximum rate is 500kHz actually needs around
    3ms per channel
  • Total time around 50ms per event
  • Analogue HCAL
  • With multiplexing at or below 18 channels per
    line, will be less than or equal to the above
    (assuming able to multiplex output at 500kHz)
  • Digital HCAL
  • Time set by maximum data volume of all
    concentrators for each event
  • For 4 Bytes/channel, assume average maximum data
    volume per concentrator is 1 kByte 250 channels
    (pessimistic?)
  • With single serial line at 40 MHz, rate is
    40Mbits/s 5 MBytes/s, so time required is 200ms

12
Modes of operation
  • Readout board can run in any of three modes
  • Single trigger readout
  • Read all data between each trigger slow but sure
  • Semi-buffered readout
  • Read minimal information from each board per
    event e.g. trigger number and buffer occupancy
  • Must read any unbuffered electronics for each
    event
  • Buffer rest of data and read later (after beam
    spill)
  • Fully-buffered readout
  • Nothing read from readout boards per trigger
    only unbuffered electronics
  • All readout board data buffered until end of
    spill
  • A missed trigger corrupts whole spill of data
  • Semi-buffered is to avoid the need for a more
    sophisticated fast control and timing system

13
DAQ readout rates
  • Assumptions
  • Average event data ECAL 19 kBytes, DHCAL 5
    kBytes (?) (AHCAL 3 kBytes), other (beam
    monitoring, etc) 2 kBytes (??)
  • Average time for clear/trigger/interrupt from end
    of one event to start of read of next 0.1ms.
    Implies beam rate gt10kHz
  • VME data speeds non-block transfer 4 MBytes/s,
    block transfer 16 MBytes/s
  • Semi-buffered readout of ECAL and HCAL is 400
    Bytes per event total, read out with non-block
    transfer so takes 0.1ms
  • All beam monitoring, etc, data is always
    unbuffered and is read out with non-block
    transfer so takes 0.5ms per event
  • Significantly bigger than data transfer time to
    readout board of 0.2ms
  • Transfer time is not a limiting factor
  • Disk write speed 20 MBytes/s always
    outperforms VME

14
DAQ readout rates (cont)
  • Rates for the different modes
  • Single trigger 24kBytes block transfer 1.5ms,
    total 2.3ms per event rate limited to 430Hz
  • Semi-buffered 400 Bytes takes 0.1ms so 0.9ms per
    event during spill rate limited to 1.1kHz. 1.5ms
    per event outside of spill rate limited to 670Hz
  • Fully-buffered Only time saved is readout of 100
    Bytes, so 0.8ms per event during spill rate
    limited to 1.2kHz. 1.6ms per event outside of
    spill rate limited to 630Hz
  • No significant gain from using fully-buffered
    mode over semi-buffered mode
  • Simpler trigger, better error detection and event
    verification in semi-buffered mode

15
Total data sample sizes
  • Want to save unsuppressed data for noise and
    pedestal studies but also want processed data for
    analysis
  • Raw event size 26 kBytes (assuming no
    significant gzip compression)
  • Processed event size 4 kBytes (assuming DHCAL
    can be reduced?)
  • Total disk space needed per event 30 kBytes
  • Want to run in many configurations
  • Particle type, energy, HCAL, preshower, angle,
    etc 100 configurations
  • Need 106 events per configuration
  • Total event sample 108 events 3 TBytes
  • Just brought 3.2 TBytes for BaBar for 6k
  • We have budgeted 12k for DAQ disk
  • Processed data is 400 GBytes
  • DESY have said they will host data long term

16
What if no zero suppression in DHCAL?
  • How would these numbers change if DHCAL raw bits
    are read out?
  • Event data size is now fixed at 45 kBytes per
    event
  • Transfer time to readout board reduced to 0.03ms
    as now always transfering 1kbit 128 bytes
  • Buffer memories will contain 45 kBytes spread
    over 11 boards, i.e. 4 kBytes per board, so can
    still buffer 2k events
  • VME readout modes single trigger becomes 210Hz,
    semi-buffered and fully buffered become 250Hz out
    of spill but are still above 1kHz during the
    spill
  • The total event size is 66 kBytes per event,
    giving a total data sample size of 7 Tbytes
    processed data size is unaffected
  • Could always do zero suppression in DAQ software
    so disk space as before
  • Worth considering if this simplifies (and reduces
    cost) of on-detector electronics significantly

17
Summary
  • With some firmware effort, the ECAL readout
    boards may be able to be used for both the AHCAL
    and DHCAL options
  • Savings in software effort, code uniformity,
    trigger distribution, etc.
  • Rates of around 1kHz during a spill, 600Hz
    outside of a spill would be possible
  • Buffering up to 2k events during the spill
    on-board
  • Data volumes would be large but affordable
  • Even if DHCAL is read out unsuppressed
  • BUT important to cross check the assumptions
    made here are realistic
  • Compatibility of different HCAL readouts
  • Amounts of HCAL data
  • Beam spill timings
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com