Title: Transparency of Transition from 2.75 mm to 1.8 mm Microincision Surgery
1Transparency of Transition from 2.75 mm to 1.8 mm
Microincision Surgery
- Jay McDonald II, MD
- Adjunct Clinical Professor
- University of Arkansas School of Medicine
Financial Interest AcuFocus, Addition
Technology, Advanced Vision Science, Alcon
Laboratories, Bausch Lomb, Ophthalmic
Innovations Intl.
2Purpose
- To evaluate the Stellaris Vision Enhancement
System for transition from 2.75 mm to 1.8 mm
microincision phacoemulsification surgery
3Field Observation Study (FOS)
- The Stellaris Vision Enhancement System to
perform phacoemulsification cataract extraction - 50 sites (2,000 cases) USA, Europe, and Asia
- 20 cataract procedures per group
- Surgeon experience questionnaire
- 11 procedures (small and microincision) data
presented here
4FOS-Method
- Surgery techniques
- Standard coaxial
- Coaxial micro-incision cataract surgery (C-MICS)
- Biaxial (bimanual) micro-incision cataract
surgery (B-MICS - Consistency all eyes implanted with the SofPort
Advanced Optics IOL (LI61AO) - Operative assessments fragmentation,
followability and holdability of nuclear
fragments, chamber stability and instances of
surge, as well as changes to technique
necessitated by the change from a 2.75 mm to 1.8
mm incision - Measures
- Average phaco power (APP)
- Average phaco time (APT)
- Equivalent phaco time (EPT)
- Case time
- BBS used during case
- Corneal clarity on the first postoperative day
5(No Transcript)
6(No Transcript)
7Stellaris versus Millennium
Phaco EPT APT Phaco Vacuum mm Hg IA Vacuum mm Hg Bottle Height BBS Total Phaco/ IA Time
Stellaris (1) 20 005.24 025.98 75 (max 200) 50 (max 600) 140 cm 68 cc 6 min.
(2) 22 003.93 003.93 130 (max 200) 375 (max 600) 140 cm 76 cc 4 min.
(3) 17 001.58 009.26 75 (max 200) 250 (max 600) 140 cm 81 cc 6 min.
(4) 36 018.41 050.58 75 (max 200) 140 (max 600) 140 cm 143 cc 7 min.
(5) 19 004.64 023.71 80 (max 200) 130 (max 600) 140 cm 92 cc 6 min.
Mature Cut (6) 32 024.55 116.74 60 (max 200) 120 (max 600) 140 cm 178 cc 13 min.
Millennium (1) 11 0051 0005 78 (max 170) 270 (max 550) 120 cm/110 cm 200 cc 4 min.
(2) 12 0027 0003 116 (max 170) 215 (max 550) 120 cm/110 cm 180 cc 4 min.
(3) 5 0020 0001 110 (max 170) 220 (max 550) 120 cm/110 cm 180 cc 4 min.
8Postoperative Results
- Physician efficiency faster real time surgery
with Stellaris vs. Millennium (09.80 vs.
032.70) - Stellaris uses 41 less BBS during the procedure
(Mean106.4cc vs. 186.7cc) - Less fluid irrigated through the patient's
anterior chamber reduces the endothelial cell
exposure to the irrigation turbulence - Less endothelial cell damage reduces corneal
stromal edema during the immediate (POD 1), and
mid-range (POW1) post-operative period
9Surgical Efficiency
- Stellaris uses 31 less phaco vacuum than
Millennium - Increased "purchase" efficiency during the
emulsification of the nuclear segment - Greater "cutting efficiency" during the procedure
- More efficient vacuum fluidics increases chamber
stability - Reduces fluid turbulence which may cause corneal
endothelial cell trauma - Stellaris Z average41.36 mm Hg max of 200 mm Hg
- Millennium Z average 59.7 mm Hg max of 170 mm
Hg - Stellaris uses 25 less I/A vacuum than
Millennium, during aspiration of the lens
cortical remnants and viscoelastic - Increased fluidics efficiency
- Less turbulence
- Less potential endothelial cell damage
- Stellaris Z average177.5 mm Hg max of 600 mm Hg
- Millennium Z average 235 mm Hg max of 550 mm Hg
10Personal Experience
- Seamless transition from 2.8 mm to 1.8 mm phaco
- The smaller hand piece improves my
maneuverability within the eye with no loss of
cutting efficiency - My phaco times have decreased 10 percent and
fluid as well as power in the eye has continued
to decrease with time
11Post Op Outcomes
- Nuclear fragmentation, followability, and
holdability were judged excellent - No instances of surge were reported to date
- Phaco power and case time were low
- Corneal clarity at Day 1 postoperative exam was
judged excellent
12Conclusion
- The Stellaris Vision Enhancement System supports
a wide range of phaco procedures, and has
incorporated fluidics and power innovations that
allow surgeons to segue smoothly to microincision
phaco - To date, the move to microincision phaco appears
to be very straightforward, and patient outcomes
have been uniformly excellent