Title: Practical Implications of Regulatory Convergence
1Practical Implications of Regulatory Convergence
Lessons from Basel II
- Mary Frances Monroe
- Division of Banking Supervision and Regulation
- Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System
- Presentation to CPCU Society Symposium
- Boston, Massachusetts
- June 11, 2005
2Practical Implications of Regulatory Convergence
Goals of Basel II
- Goals of Basel II
- Greater risk sensitivity reliance on a banks
internal assessments of capital adequacy - Suitability reflect and support sound credit
risk management practices - Incentive Compatibility improve internal risk
management practices and adapt to evolving
markets and products - Competitive Equity promote and enhance a level
playing field across international boundaries
3Practical Implications of Regulatory Convergence
Goals of Basel II
- Goals of Basel II (continued)
- Safety and Soundness ensure consistency with
fundamental banking principles - Balance attempts a reasonable trade-off between
enhanced risk sensitivity and implementation
burden - Non-cyclicality capital charges should be
relatively stable over the economic cycle - Aggregate capital level roughly maintain the
current amount of capital in the banking system -
4Practical Implications of Regulatory Convergence
Overview of Basel II
- Structure of Basel II
- Pillar I Minimum Capital Requirements
- Credit Risk, Operational Risk, and Trading Book
components - Importance of Qualifying Criteria for Advanced
Approaches - Importance of Corporate Governance Structure
- Importance of Validation
5Practical Implications of Regulatory Convergence
Overview of Basel II (continued)
- Structure of Basel II
- Pillar II Supervisory Review
- Focus on risks not fully captured in Pillar 1,
factors not taken into account under Pillar 1,
and external factors - Four key principles
- Pillar III Market Discipline/Disclosure
- Materiality
- Frequency
6Practical Implications of Regulatory Convergence
Lessons from Basel II
- Need to balance convergence with flexibility
- Basel II goal of convergence of regulatory
capital standards and measurement - Reality is different national markets
- Necessitates degree of national discretion in
implementation - Accord Implementation Group established to
promote consistency in application of Basel II,
especially where national discretion exists - Address cross-border home-host issues
- Case studies have been conducted
7Practical Implications of Regulatory Convergence
Lessons from Basel II
- Importance of Stress Testing and Scenario
Analysis - Regulatory minimums are only a starting point
- Models are imperfect
- Models may not capture all material risks
- Model assumptions/parameters may understate
degree of risk - Models may be based on backward-looking data
- Taking stress conditions and scenarios into
account involves both quantitative analysis and
qualitative judgment with an enterprise-wide view
8Practical Implications of Regulatory Convergence
Lessons from Basel II
- Need to supplement risk-based capital standards
with other supervisory tools - Importance of leverage ratio
- Need for mechanism for early intervention
- For U.S. banks, this is accomplished through
prompt corrective action - Ability of bank to engage in certain activities
or expand operations is constrained if cushion
above minimum capital standards is not maintained
or bank is deemed to have engaged in unsafe and
unsound practices
9Practical Implications of Regulatory Convergence
Lessons from Basel II
- Importance of Enterprise-wide Risk Management
- Risks transcend legal entity/line of
business/functional boundaries - Need to consider impact of business line
activities and risk-taking decisions on other
parts of the organization - Consolidated supervisor must assess impact of
different prudential supervision frameworks - Federal Reserve supervision has moved from
historical analysis on legal entity basis to more
forward-looking assessments of risk management
and financial condition of consolidated
organization
10Practical Implications of Regulatory Convergence
Lessons from Basel II
- Importance of quantitative impact studies
- QIS 4 U.S. regulators are faced with lower than
expected capital levels and broad divergence
across firms - Data limitations give rise to need to balance
quantitative and qualitative approaches and rely
more on the latter in the short term - Loss data collection exercise for operational
risk indicates more robust operational risk data
collection and increasingly sophisticated
approaches to measuring risk
11Practical Implications of Regulatory Convergence
Beyond Basel II
- Joint Basel/IOSCO Working Group on Trading
Activities and Double Default - New option for treatment of counterparty credit
risk - Limited recognition of double default
- Improvements to the trading book capital regime
- Boundary between firms banking and trading books
- Prudent valuation guidance
- Capturing full range of risks of traded positions
- Consistent approach to unsettled and failed trades
12Practical Implications of Regulatory Convergence
Beyond Basel II
- Joint Forum Working Group on Liquidity Risk
- Involves banking, securities, and insurance
sectors - Focus promotion of financial stability
- Developing paper for publication later this year
along three workstreams - Trends in liquidity risk management and
supervision - Stress testing and contingency funding plans
- Sources of liquidity risk (especially in stress
environments)