Title: Portfolio Performance Measures
1Portfolio Performance Measures
- What do we require of portfolio managers?
- 1. Earn an average (or fair) return for the
level of risk in the portfolio - 2. Ability to manage risk
- 3. Eliminate unnecessary risks
2Portfolio Performance Measurement
- Benchmarking
- Gives us a reference point for comparison
- Comparison of return and risk
3Portfolio Performance Measurement
- Choosing a benchmark
- The most important consideration for portfolio
performance measurement is benchmark choice. All
portfolio evaluation is dependent on benchmark
choice - 1. Make sure the benchmark is unambiguous
- 2. Make sure the benchmark is an investable
index - 3. Make sure the benchmark has a measurable
value
4Portfolio Performance Measurement
- Choosing a benchmark
- 4. Make sure that the benchmark is appropriate
for the style of portfolio that you are
evaluating - 5. Make sure the benchmark is specified in
advance - 6. Make sure the benchmark reflects current
knowledge and opinion - 7. Dont change indices. Be consistent across
portfolios
5Portfolio Performance Measures
6Portfolio Performance Measures
- Treynors measure
- Treynors measure basically gives us a measure of
return per unit of market risk (or systematic
risk) that our investment earns - Strictly speaking, the larger the Treynor measure
the better. However, we would like to have some
benchmark with which to compare our individual
Treynor measures.
7Portfolio Performance Measures
- Tryenors measure
- Benchmark comparison
8Portfolio Performance Measures
- Treynors measure
- If Ti gt Tm, the portfolio would plot above the
security market line, indicating superior
performance by the portfolio manager. - If Ti lt Tm, the portfolio would plot below the
security market line, indicating poor performance
by the portfolio manager.
9Portfolio Performance Measures
- Sharpe performance measure
10Portfolio Performance Measures
- Sharpe performance measure
- Thus, the Sharpe measure gives us a measure of
return per unit of total risk. Again, the higher
the Sharpe measure, the better the performance.
We can also compare individual Sharpe measures to
a benchmark
11Portfolio Performance Measures
- Sharpe performance measure
- Instead of plotting deviations from the security
market line, like the Treynor measure, we are
plotting deviations from the market determine
price of risk as defined by the capital market
line (CML).
12Portfolio Performance Measures
- Sharpe measure
- If Si gt Sm, the asset earn more than the risk
premium required by the capital market line,
indicating superior performance by the portfolio
manager. - If Si lt Sm the asset earn less than the risk
premium required by the capital market line,
indicating poor performance by the portfolio
manager.
13Portfolio Performance Measures
- Comparing the Treynor and Sharpe measures
- For a completely diversified portfolio of assets,
the Sharpe and Treynor measures would be
identical in what they are measuring - Treynor measures performance relative to
systematic risk - Sharpe measure s performance relative to total
risk
14Portfolio Performance Measures
- Comparing the Treynor and Sharpe measures
- Sharpe measure gives some indication of how good
the portfolio manager is at diversifying away
unsystematic risk - A poorly diversified portfolio could have a high
Treynor ranking
15Portfolio Performance Measures
- Jensens Alpha
- Jensens alpha is based on the ideas contained in
the CAPM. It, like the Treynor measure, measures
how well a portfolio manager does at dealing with
systematic risk - To calculate Jensens alpha we need to estimate
the following regression model
16Portfolio Performance Measures
- Jensens Alpha
- ? measures the degree to which managers are
earning significant returns after accounting for
market risk, as measured by beta. If the manager
is earning a fair return for the given
portfolios systematic risk, then ? would be zero.
17Portfolio Performance Measures
- Jensens Alpha
- () ? indicates good performance
- (-) ? indicates poor performance
- Jensens alpha allows us to statistically test
whether the return the manager earns is
significantly more (or less) than what we would
expect using the CAPM. - Jensens alpha allows us to get a performance
measure that incorporates information from more
than one time period.
18Portfolio Performance Measures
- Jensens Alpha
- The validity of the Jensen performance measure is
tied to the validity of the CAPM. Thus, some
individuals will choose estimate Jensen's alpha
performing the regression model without
subtracting the risk-free rate. This gives us
the alpha from the characteristic line. Its
interpretation is the same as the interpretation
of Jensen's alpha.
19Portfolio Performance Measures
- Fama and French (1993) three factor model alpha
20Portfolio Performance Measures
- Fama and French (1993) three factor model
- The alpha in this model can be interpreted in the
same way as the Jensen's alpha. A positive
Fama/French alpha would indicate performance
better than expectations. - Given that the Fama/French model predicts returns
better than the CAPM, the Fama/French alpha
should be a more precise measure of portfolio
performance than the Jensen's alpha.
21Portfolio Performance Measures
- Famas performance measure
- Fama breaks performance by a portfolio manager
into two categories selectivity and
diversification. Famas measure incorporates
measures for managing both systematic and
unsystematic risk.
22Portfolio Performance Measures
- Famas performance measure
- Selectivity measures the ability of the
portfolio manager to earn a return that is
consistent with the portfolios market
(systematic) risk. The selectivity measure is
23Portfolio Performance Measures
- Famas performance measure
- () selectivity indicates that the manager earned
a higher return than the systematic risk of the
portfolio would indicate. Basically, you are
just comparing the return on the asset with the
return earned by the CAPM.
24Portfolio Performance Measures
- Famas performance measure
- Diversification Diversification measures the
extent to which the portfolio may not have been
completely diversified. Diversification is
measured as
25Portfolio Performance Measures
- Famas performance measure
- If the portfolio is completely diversified,
contains no unsystematic risk, then
diversification measure would be zero. A
positive diversification measure indicates that
the portfolio is not completely diversified it
would contain unsystematic risk. - If the diversification measure is positive, it
represents the extra return that the portfolio
should earn for not being completely diversified.
26Portfolio Performance Measures
- Famas performance measure
- Net selectivity selectivity - diversification
- Net selectivity measures how well the portfolio
manager did at earning a fair return for the
portfolios systematic risk and how well the
portfolio manager did at diversifying away
unsystematic risk. - Positive net selectivity indicates the portfolio
manager did a good job. Negative net selectivity
indicates that the portfolio manager did a poor
job.