Title: Galactic interstellar emission with DC2
1Galactic interstellar emissionwith DC2
- Jean-Marc Casandjian
- CEA Saclay
2goals
- how well can we reconstruct the gas cosmic-ray
distributions in the plane? - test the linear combination approximation
- learn about systematics
- look for deviations between the interstellar
model and DC2 data - compare the DC2 GALPROP diffuse model with linear
fit - fit the DC2 data with GALPROP model as a function
of energy - fit the DC2 data with the linear ISM model as a
function of energy
3linear fit to GALPROP model
- ideal case
- no Poisson noise
- same input gas IC maps as in GALPROP
Galprop map ?qHI.N(HI) ? qCO.W(CO) qICIC
Cst ? qhiHI qHI01.HI01 qHI2.HI2
qHI3.HI3 qHI4.HI4 qHI5.HI5 qHI6.HI6
qHI78.HI78 GALPROP model linear
decomposition result
4linear fit to GALPROP model
- nice qHI emissivity gradient
- nice X ratio gradient (Strong et al. 04)
5linear fit to GALPROP model
- small, but systematic and structured differences
- not understood at the moment
- important impact on source detection and
isotropic background
Residuals () at 320 MeV
6DC2 data vs. GALPROP model
Ng qnorm gtmodelmap ?qsou Fsources expo
Iext exposr
- isotropic background
- see Andy Strongs report
E2. Intensity (cm-2 sr-1 s-1 MeV)
galprop
Energy (MeV)
7DC2 data vs. GALPROP model
- again small, but systematic residuals
binning 0.5
?
8DC2 data vs. linear ISM model
N? ?qHI.N(HI) ? qCO.W(CO) qICIC Cst
? qhiHI qHI01.HI01 qHI2.HI2 qHI3.HI3
qHI4.HI4 qHI5.HI5 qHI6.HI6
qHI78.HI78 resulting model DC2 photon map
Energy range 100 MeV 200 GeV
9DC2 data vs. linear ISM model
- good residuals, but obvious fitting difficulties
- several rings are not detected
- at low energy because of the poor angular
resolution - at high energy because of poor statistics
100 MeV 200 GeV
?
10a lot more work needed to understand
- the impact of the choice of IS emission model on
- source detection at small scales (low latitude)
- extragalactic intensity at large scale
- effective energy band E1, E2 over which we can
trust q(E, r) and X(r)