Comparing%20Realized%20and%20Bi-Power%20Variation%20in%20Lee-Mykland%20Statistic - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Comparing%20Realized%20and%20Bi-Power%20Variation%20in%20Lee-Mykland%20Statistic

Description:

Future Directions. Lee and Mykland (2006) The Bi-Power multiplied term in the denominator of the statistic was replaced by ... Future Directions. GET RV TO WORK ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:47
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 12
Provided by: warren90
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Comparing%20Realized%20and%20Bi-Power%20Variation%20in%20Lee-Mykland%20Statistic


1
Comparing Realized and Bi-Power Variation in
Lee-Mykland Statistic
  • Warren Davis
  • April 11 Presentation

2
Outline
  • Discussion of Lee-Mykland
  • Change of Statistic
  • Simulation Set-Up
  • Simulation Results
  • Future Directions

3
Lee and Mykland (2006)
4
The Bi-Power multiplied term in the denominator
of the statistic was replaced by a simple
realized variance, with a sum of returns squared,
as was used in the BNS statistics earlier in the
course
This statistic was run on Bristol-Myers stock
data, yielding 713 hits, as opposed to 1912 with
the Bi-Power statistic.
5
Simulation Set-Up
  • The following random variables were used
  • A set of normally distributed returns with
    mean0, St. Dev. .015 (95 of returns less than
    3)
  • A random Poisson variable with mean .01
  • A normally distributed variable with mean 0, St.
    Dev..1 or .05

6
Simulation Set-Up
  • The Poisson integers were multiplied by the
    second random normal distribution to create a
    series of jumps
  • These jumps were added to the original normally
    distributed returns
  • The Bi-Power and Realized Variance versions of
    Lee-Mykland were then ran on the data, seeing how
    accurately they performed in flagging jumps

7
Simulation Results- No Jumps Added
  • Bi-Power Results

Realized Variance Results
Bi-Power Results
Realized Variance Results
of Hits 28.03
7.54 (4.57) (2.68)
of Hits 28.03
7.54 (4.57) (2.68)
Returns Flagged .2803 .0754

8
Results- Poisson Integer Jumps
Bi-Power Results
Realized Variance Results
Hits False
10.60 3.07
Correct Hits .98.17
99.05
Jumps Missed
.9569 1.609
9
Poisson x N(0,.0025)
Bi-Power Results
Realized Variance Results
Hits False
21.62 5.65
Correct Hits 35.05
23.81
Jumps Missed 62.67
76.19
10
Poisson x N(0,.01)
Bi-Power Results
Realized Variance Results
Hits False
19.31 4.47
Correct Hits 53.33
32.76
Jumps Missed 37.27
67.77
11
Future Directions
  • GET RV TO WORK
  • Explore iteration process of removing jumps, then
    retesting results
  • Explore other estimators of local variance and
    test these, particularly exponential variations
    of bi-power
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com