Title: VHR SAR and Optical sensors for earthquake damage mapping: automatic and semiautomatic techniques fo
1VHR SAR and Optical sensors for earthquake damage
mapping automatic and semi-automatic techniques
for features extraction
- Marco Chini, Christian Bignami, Salvatore
Stramondo - Istituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia
(INGV) Remote Sensing Laboratory, Rome, Italy
2Outline
- Introduction
- Building map extraction
- by VHR SAR
- by VHR Optical
-
- Single Building Damage Level (SBDL)
- Test case Bam (2003)
- Conclusions
3Introduction - 1
- Satellite Remote Sensing provides a synoptic view
of surface effects of extreme events and has
assumed an important role in supporting natural
disaster management and mitigation. - Concerning earthquakes EO data are used to
generate a detailed map of damage to urban
structures. - The potential of SAR and Optical images can be
exploited to support the decision chain of Civil
Protection for crisis management and to provide a
rapid mapping of damage to buildings and
infrastructures. - Combining SAR and Optical images overcome some
limitation as those due to weather conditions and
Sun illumination.
4Introduction - 2
- In terms of Civil Protection, in order to manage
the crisis phases, the prompt response, the fast
detection and classification of damages grade
affecting buildings and infrastructures can be
useful to support the rescue activities. - This is particularly true especially in remote
areas or where the infrastructures are not well
developed to ensure the necessary communication
exchanges. - Indeed, in the aftermath of these severe
disastrous events one of the most urgent needs is
to estimate with sufficient reliability and
rapidity the amount of population and
infrastructures affected for different degrees of
damage.
5Introduction - 3
- VHR (SAR and Optical) data are potentially able
to provide very detailed mapping of the urban
environment with a meter/sub-meter ground
resolution. - At the same time, the increase in volume of data
creates additional problems in terms of automatic
classification. - An urban area appears as a complex structure
containing buildings, transportation systems,
utilities, infrastructures, commercial and
recreational areas. At different scale, a simple
building may appear as a complex structure also,
with a lot of architectural details surrounded by
gardens, trees, buildings, roads, shadows, social
and technical infrastructure and many temporary
objects, such as cars, buses, etc
6Introduction - 4
- If on one hand the increase of geometrical
resolution leads to a fine representation of the
scene, on the other hand it results in a decrease
of resolution in the spectral domain. - It is evident that this problem is intrinsically
related to the sensor resolution and it cannot be
solved by increasing the number of spectral
channels. - Thus, a multiscale contextual analysis for
exploiting contextual relations must be included
in the analysis of VHR data in order to model the
spatial information of the pixels.
7Building map extraction
- Classification of VHR (SAR or Optical) image
before the earthquake, in order to extract the
map of the buildings to define a damage level at
building scale, useful for the Civil Protection
activities. - The classification process must be fast, thus the
selection of the most important input features
and a selection of a faster classifier (i.e.
unsupervised) is mandatory. - Change detection analysis has to be applied only
to the extracted building map, using pre- and
post-seismic optical or SAR data. - Definition of change detection features for
characterizing the changes occurred in terms of
damage levels is necessary.
8Building map extraction Rome test case
- Input Panchromatic image second order
textural parameters - The land use map (9 classes) has been obtained
using a Neural Network and pruning technique for
reducing the input space and optimizing the net.
- The pruning step reduce the input space from 241
to 140.
QuickBird image July 19, 2004
Land use Map of Rome
F. Pacifici, M. Chini, W. J. Emery, A neural
network approach using multi-scale textural
metrics from very high resolution panchromatic
imagery for urban land-use classification.
Remote Sensing of Environment, Vol. 113, No. 6,
pp. 1276 1292, June 15th, 2009.
9Building map extraction Indianapolis text case
- Input Intensity SAR image Open and Close
Morphological profiles with an anisotropic and
asymmetric structure element. - The land use map (7 classes) has been obtained
using a Neural Network and pruning technique for
reducing the input space and optimizing the net.
- The pruning step reduce the input space from 321
to 50.
Land use Map of Indianapolis
TerraSAR-X image of Indianapolis, July 1, 2007
QuickBird image of Indianapolis, July 11, 2007
M. Chini, F. Pacifici, W. J. Emery,
Morphological operators applied to X - band SAR
for urban land use classification, Proc.
IEEE/IGARSS 2009, Cape Town (South Africa), 13
18 July, 2009.
10Building map extraction Bam text case
- Input Panchromatic image Panchromatic Images
filtered by Open and Close Operators with
different window size (Morphological profile) - The buildings have been classified using an
unsupervised classifier
Buildings Map of Bam City
QuickBird image September 30, 2003
M. Chini, N. Pierdicca, W. J. Emery, Exploiting
SAR and VHR optical images to quantify damage
caused by the 2003 Bam earthquake. IEEE
Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing,
Vol. 47, No. 1, pp. 145 - 152, January 2009.
11Single Building Damage Level (SBDL)
SBDL a features which can be representative of
the damages occurred to each building. e.g.
Pearson correlation coefficient between pre and
post seismic pixels belonging to each building.
12Test Case Bam (2003)
- On December 26, 2003 the southeastern region of
Iran was hit by a 6.5 Moment Magnitude (Mw)
earthquake whose epicenter was located very close
to the historical city of Bam.
- DATASET
- Two QuickBird panchromatic images
- September 30, 2003
- Off-nadir angle 9.7
- January 4, 2004
- Off-nadir angle 23.8
13Test Case Bam (2003)
Three different levels of damage Light (or No
Damage), Medium and Heavy.
14Test Case Bam (2003)
Pan 09/30/2003
Pan 01/04/2004
15Test Case Bam (2003)
Pan 09/30/2003
Pan 01/04/2004
16Test Case Bam (2003)
Pan 01/04/2004
Pan 09/30/2003
17Test Case Bam (2003)
Comparison between SBDL statistic and Ground
Survey Total Buildings SBDL12498 Ground
survey12063 Error3,6 Heavy damaged SBDL6150 G
round survey6615 Error7
- Using the threshold on the image difference (pre-
and post-) has been possible only classifying the
completely collapsed buildings. Medium and low
damage not well classified.
18Test Case Bam (2003)
Damaged buildings from ground survey European
Macroseismic Scale 1998 EMS98
Grade 1 Negligible to slight damage Grade 2
Moderate damage Grade 3 Substantial to heavy
damage Grade 4 Very heavy damage Grade 5
Destruction
Y. Hisada, A. Shibaya, M. R. Ghayamghamian,
(2004), Building Damage and Seismic Intensity in
Bam City from the 2003 Bam, Iran, Earthquake ,
Bull. Earthq. Res. Inst. Univ. Tokyo, Vol. 79
,pp. 81-93.
19Test Case Bam (2003)
20Test Case Bam (2003)
Optical Correlation coefficients vs EMS98 damage
EMS98
- 3 different damage levels recognizable
- G1G2G3 G4 G5
- Good detection of collapsed buildings
21Conclusions
- The proposed approach can be applied to VHR
optical or SAR images indifferently. - The SBDL index has been defined and applied to
the Bam test case. - Results are satisfactory collapsed buildings can
be well recognized. - Improvements more accurate separation G4 G5
by - improving the classification and building mask
- reducing the parallax error (system requirements)
- We are applying the method to the LAquila
earthquake using COSMO-SkyMed and QuickBird image
using very detailed ground truth from ground
survey by INGV experts.