Title: UK Sport Athlete Whereabouts: Policy, Challenges and Key Recommendations Presented by: John Scott Di
1UK SportAthlete WhereaboutsPolicy,
Challenges and Key RecommendationsPresented
byJohn ScottDirectorDrug-Free Sport
2Presentation Outline
To highlight the key policies of UK Sport
underpinning its Athlete Whereabouts System (AWS)
To present the challenges facing UK Sport in
delivering an athlete-centred whereabouts system
To highlight a number of key recommendations
considered by UK Sport to develop its AWS and
to offer these recommendations to the
Association of National Anti- Doping
Organisations for consideration
3UK Sport Missed Tests 2005/6 Report (July 1st
September 30th )Initial Stages
50
This reflects Quarter Two 2005 under the new UK
Sport Athlete Whereabouts rules.
181
16
90
90
OOCT Tests
Missed Tests
Number Of Sports
Strike 1
4UK SportAnti-Doping Forumon Athlete Whereabouts
- October 27th London
- Representatives from sport including athlete
support personnel, coaches, athletes, Drug
Control Officers and UK Sport Staff - Purpose To discuss the UK interpretation of the
provision of athlete whereabouts and the
missed test policy and review UK policy.
5UK Sport Policy Statement
- UK Sport Athlete Whereabouts policy and
procedure is set as guidelines in the National
Governing Body (NGB) Anti-Doping Agreement and
Model Rules
6Challenges
- NGBs follow International Federation (IF)
athlete whereabouts rules which may differ from
UK Sport rules leading to inconsistencies
between sports - UK Sport defines missed test differently from
another country leading to confusion for UK
athletes competing and tested abroad and a sense
of potentially being disadvantaged to
competitors from other countries
7Key Recommendations
- 1 Clear mandatory article(s) from WADA regarding
provision of whereabouts details to ensure global
harmonisation. - 2 Robust system of monitoring International
Federations/NADOs by WADA regarding compliance
with a mandatory athlete whereabouts system and
where appropriate, impose a rigorous
international education programme - 3 For WADA to provide an agreed and binding
definition of a missed test
8UK Sport Policy Statement
- No advance notice out of competition testing is
conducted with absolutely no notice for the
athlete. - Telephones are not used to notify athletes.
-
9Challenges
- Any form of notice and athlete becomes less
responsible for the information they provide - Contradicts the definition of no notice testing
and potentially compromises the quality and
veracity of the testing process - Notice provides the opportunity for athlete to
manipulate the sample
10Key Recommendations
-
- 4. A mandatory article from WADA that clearly
defines no advance notice testing that reflects
the known science - 5. The principle of athlete responsibility must
be central to no notice testing and therefore the
use of telephones or any other communication
devices should not be permitted
11UK Sport Policy Statement
- Athletes should provide a minimum of 1 hour 5
days of the week and the 2 days not requiring
details should not be consecutive.
12Challenges
- 2 consecutive days without whereabouts may permit
flushing out of prohibited substances - Providing details for 1 hour on 7 days of the
week may be impractical for some athletes and
lacks flexibility
13Key Recommendations
- For WADA to provide a mandatory article based on
a principled approach of one universal and
consistent system that provides deterrence and
has the support of the athlete community - One set of procedures not open to interpretation
but easy for athletes to update
14UK Sport Policy Statement
- DCO only visit one location for one hour at the
time and venue stated by the athlete
15Challenges
- Logistically and financially difficult for Drug
Control Officer (DCO) to attend multiple
locations - Visiting multiple locations creates a more
complex system open to more interpretation and
breakdown - Devalues athletes responsibility if we allow
multiple venues and times for DCOs to find the
athlete - International Federations have different rules
- Guaranteeing one location a day for one hour may
be difficult, particularly for those athletes
with jobs
16Key Recommendations
- 7. For WADA to provide mandatory articles based
on a principled approach on the duration a drug
testing officer attends a whereabouts venue the
time the DCO waits should be within reasonable
parameters and directly relate to the information
you ask the athlete to provide - 8 For WADA to facilitate a robust education
programme that addresses the practical and
technical issues relating to athlete whereabouts
systems and policies
17UK Sport Policy Statement
- UK Sport recommend to NGBs that whereabouts
strikes and missed test strikes should be
combined any 3 over an 18 month period an
Anti Doping Rule Violation
18Challenges
- International Federations having different
policies leading to confusion and multiple,
concurrent infractions - 3 strikes over 18 months is not understood is
18 months an effective timeframe for missed
tests?
19Key Recommendations
- 9. For WADA to research and provide mandatory
articles regarding an effective timeframe for
three missed tests and/or whereabout violations
to equal an anti-doping violation
20Athlete Perspective
- I just want to know that the other athletes I
compete against have to go through the same
procedures I have to. I dont mind providing my
whereabouts details and I know it is my
responsibility. Just make it simple and easy to
do! - Donna Frazer, UK Olympic Athlete
21Conclusion Key Messages
- For WADA to provide mandatory articles regarding
athlete whereabouts based on four themes - Clear, unambiguous definition of missed test
- No advance notice testing to be defined based on
scientific evidence - Simple and effective system that ensures athlete
responsibility and credibility of testing system - Harmonisation of education, policies and
communication between national and international
sport organisations.
22