Title: Week 3 Seminar
1Week 3 - Seminar
- Academic Research and Writing Skills Workshop for
Business Strategy
2Aims
- To discuss the rationale for doing a literature
review, describe what it should contain and how
it should be structured - To identify the facilities/resources available to
students for conducting research into the subject
of business strategy - To ensure that students are familiar with and
understand the Harvard referencing system - (Please refer to handouts for references for
material used in this presentation)
3Literature Reviews
- What is a literature review?
- What you need to do in order to write a
literature review? - Why do a literature review?
- Goals of a literature review
- Contents of a literature review
- Example of a good and a bad review
4What is a literature review?
- ... a search and evaluation of the available
literature in a given subject area... - Surveying the literature in your chosen area of
study Synthesising the information gathered
into a summary Critically analysing the
information gathered Identifying areas of
controversy Formulating questions for further
research Presenting the literature according to
an organised style
5To write a Literature Review
- define the topic, or research question
- compile a list of the keywords (search strategy)
- identify and select relevant information sources
(e.g. library catalogues indexes and electronic
databases and the Internet) - conduct searches, interpret and evaluate results,
and if required, modify search strategy - locate and obtain relevant references found in
search results (may require you to search library
catalogues visit and use other libraries)
6Typical Research Resources
- The library (e.g. books, journals, newspapers,
government publications) - The WWW (e.g. electronic search engines academic
journal databases company web-sites newspapers
government reports)
7Goals of a Literature Review (Neuman, 2000, p.
446)
- to demonstrate a familiarity with a body of
knowledge and establish credibility - A review tells a reader that the researcher knows
the research in an area and knows the major
issues. A good review increases the reader's
confidence in the researcher's professional
competence, ability, and background. - A review outlines the direction of research on a
question and shows the development of knowledge.
A good review places a research project in a
context and demonstrates its relevance by making
connections to a body of knowledge. - to integrate and summarise what is known in an
area
8Some points to remember as the writer of a
literature reviewit is not a descriptive list
of the information gathered it is not a summary
of one piece of literature after another the
review must be defined by a guiding concept (eg.
essay question, research objective, etc.)
your purpose is to convey to the reader what
knowledge and ideas have been established on a
topic - what are the strengths and weaknesses
organise the information gathered into sections
that present themes. do not attempt to list
all published material, but rather synthesise
and evaluate the literature according to your
guiding concept Contents of a Literature Review
- It is not a descriptive list of the information
gathered. - It is not a summary of one piece of literature
after another. - The review must be defined by a guiding concept
(e.g. essay - question, research objective).
- The purpose is to
- convey to the reader what knowledge and ideas
have been established on a topic - what are the
strengths and weaknesses? - organise the information gathered into sections
that present themes - Do not attempt to list all published material,
but rather synthesise and evaluate the literature
according to your guiding concept.
9Contents of a Literature Review
- Introduction
- define the topic, providing an appropriate
context for reviewing the literature - establish writer's reasons (point of view) for
reviewing the literature - explain the organisation of the review (sequence)
- state what literature is and is not included
(scope)
10Contents of a Literature Review
- In the Body
- group the literature according to common themes
- provide insight into relationship between central
topic and a larger area (i.e. discipline) - proceed from the general, wider view of the
research under review to the specific
11Contents of a Literature Review
- In the Conclusion
- summarise major contributions of the literature
- evaluate the current "state of the art"
literature reviewed - point out major flaws, or gaps in research
- outline issues pertinent to future study (if
evidence is there to suggest this)
12Example of a Bad Review (Neuman, 2000)
- Sexual harassment has many consequences. Adams,
Kottke, and Padgitt (1983) found that some women
students said they avoided taking a class or
working with certain professors because of the
risk of harassment. They also found that men and
women students reacted differently. Their
research was a survey of 1,000 men and women
graduate and undergraduate students. Benson and
Thomson's study in Social Problems (1982) lists
many problems created by sexual harassment. In
their excellent book, The Lecherous Professor,
Dziech and Weiner (1990) give a long list of
difficulties that victims have suffered.
13Example of a Better Review (Neuman, 2000)
- The victims of sexual harassment suffer a
range of consequences, from lowered self-esteem
and loss of self-confidence to withdrawal from
social interaction, changed career goals, and
depression (Adams, Kottke, and Padgitt, 1983
Benson and Thomson, 1982 Dziech and Weiner,
1990). For example, Adams, Kottke, and Padgitt
(1983) noted that 13 percent of women students
said they avoided taking a class or working
with certain professors because of the risk of
harassment.
14Harvard Referencing
- See hand-out and/or visit the sites listed below
for further information - http//www.shef.ac.uk/library/libdocs/hsl-dvc1.htm
l - http//www.lmu.ac.uk/lss/ls/docs/harvfron.htm
- http//lisweb.curtin.edu.au/guides/handouts/harvar
d.html