A FRAMEWORK TO BUILD JOINTVENTURES - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 24
About This Presentation
Title:

A FRAMEWORK TO BUILD JOINTVENTURES

Description:

(LORANGE; ROSS; BRONN, 1992). Types of Joint Ventures: - Bamford, Ernst and Fubini (2004) ... Final consumers and stores need a broader product line and services ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:25
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 25
Provided by: Alexa4
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: A FRAMEWORK TO BUILD JOINTVENTURES


1
A FRAMEWORK TO BUILD JOINT-VENTURES
Marcos Fava Neves Matheus Alberto
Consoli Danny Pimentel Claro Décio Zylbersztajn
2
Conceptual Introduction
  • Strategic alliances between firms are a growing
    phenomena.
  • Growing steam of research by strategy and
    organizational scholars causes and consequences
    of such partnerships (GULATI, 1998).
  • Planning, implementation and overcoming the
    challenges (difficulties) inherent to joint
    ventures and alliances are still a possibility of
    conceptual improvement.

3
The managerial problem that brings a research
problem
  • growing attention in the agribusiness scenario
  • I think we may join this other company because
    we will be able to explore good opportunities
    together...
  • From where shall we start thinking or how do we
    analyse a project?...

4
Research Question
  • How can we explore different steams of research,
    trying to combine them into a possible framework
    to build / analyze potential joint ventures?

5
Objectives and Methodology
  • Propose a framework to build Joint Ventures and
    attempt to characterize it as a possible exercise
    which academicians and business practitioners can
    evaluate a joint venture option
  • An essay was conducted on strategic alliances and
    topics on marketing channels, governance
    structures, transaction cost economics, marketing
    research and strategic management.
  • To illustrate the proposed framework a case
    study was developed

6
Literature Review
  • Strategic Alliances
  • Involves organizational arrangements between
    firms.
  • Can be understood by looking at the sequence of
    events in alliances. (LORANGE ROSS BRONN,
    1992).
  • Types of Joint Ventures - Bamford, Ernst and
    Fubini (2004)
  • Consolidation JV- deep combination of existing
    business.
  • Skill-transfer JV - transfer of some critical
    skills from one partner to the other.
  • Coordination JV - leveraging the complementary
    capabilities of both partners.
  • New-business JV - combining existing
    capabilities, not businesses, to create a new
    growth.

7
Literature Review
  • Core Competences
  • Success comes from resources and a core
    competence to use and apply these resources in a
    better way (MAHONEY PANDIAN, 1992).
  • The Resource Based View of the Firm highlight
    the uniqueness and some features of companies and
    suggests that the key for profitability is not
    make the same things that the others, but explore
    the differences. (COLLIS E MONTGOMERY, 1995
    WERNERFELT, 1984 MAHONEY, PANDIAN, 1992 STALK,
    EVANS, SHULMAN, 1992, GRANT, 2002).

8
Literature Review
  • Transaction Costs Economy
  • Coase (1937) states that there are costs in
    using market mechanisms. The transaction costs
    are the costs affecting an exchange
  • TCE studies also how partners in a transaction
    protect themselves from the risks associated with
    the exchange relations (KLEIN SHELANSKI, 1994).
  • Transaction Dimensions (Frequency Uncertainty
    Asset specificity) helps to analyze governance
    structures (Williamson, 1985)

9
A 7 Step Framework to Built Joint Ventures
10
The Framework Step 1 General Market
Opportunities
  • deep understanding about the history of the
    relationship between the candidates.
  • CASE Aand B Companies
  • Points to Discuss and Commit
  • they want to do business for a long time
  • cooperative culture
  • patient with each others mistakes
  • sense of loyalty
  • similar goals, methods of operations, corporate
    cultures and decision-making processes.
  • high management committed

11
The Framework Step 1 History of the
Relationship
  • CASE Aand B Companies
  • Points to Discuss and Commit
  • threat of unfriendly takeover
  • share financial risks of the initiative
  • investments of long term
  • dedicate people and efforts to the alliance
  • If other organization appears, they will try to
    use their offer as a benchmark and not substitute
    either A or B.
  • something very valuable to be transferred from
    one to another
  • insufficient resources to grow by its own
  • both companies desire leadership in the market
  • the relative urgency of this relationship

12
The Framework Step 2 General Market
Opportunities
  • CASE Aand B Companies Example
  • Description of the network
  • Clients need more assistance
  • Final consumers and stores need a broader
    product line and services
  • Home centers market need new products
  • Urban infra-structure will grow
  • The companies A and B market need products
    services offers together
  • 527 million hectares for use in agriculture
    (61,6 of total country area)
  • 52 million hectare have been used (10 of
    potential country area) for crops
  • 180 million hectare used for pastures.
  • Under the decision process, to offer financial
    solutions to consumers is a very important
    subject. For 50 of the distributors, this is the
    most important subject that blocks the growth of
    agricultural implements.

Source IBGE
13
Companies Network
Tradings / Exportação
Novos Mercados
Atacado / Varejo

Produtores de Cana
Usinas Açúcar
Tradings / Exportação
Produtores de Laranja
Ind. Suco de Laranja
Tradings / Exportação
Fornecedores Internacionais
V
VR
Produtores de Café
Torrefador Brasil
A Brasil
Revendas (Emp. Proj)
A Global
Consumidor Final
Ind Alim Bebidas
Produtores de Frutas
Outros Canais
Fornecedores Nacionais
Tradings
Outras Indústrias
Produtores Hortifrutis
Varejo Self service
Tradings / Exportação
B Brasil
Cooperativa
Agroind.
Florestas e Jardins
Fornecedores
Produção em Estufa
Empresas Facilitadoras
14
The Framework Step 3 Core Competences of each
Company
Source Authors
15
Step 4 Objectives of each Participant
Source Authors
16
Step 5 Analysis of Alternative Coordination
Forms
JVs Possible Advantages to Companies
Source Authors
17
Step 5 Analysis of Alternative Coordination
Forms
  • What are major advantages and risks of?
  • Joint Ventures x Market Coordination
  • Joint Ventures x Long term supply contracts
  • Joint Ventures x partial acquisition
  • Joint Ventures x Vertical Integration

Source Authors
18
The Framework Step 6 Alliance Critical Success
Factors Evaluation and Relationship Management
Critical Success Factors for Company C (A and B
Joint Venture)
Source Elaborated by authors from the case and
Bower (1999), Besanko, Dranove and Shanley
(2000), Grant (2002), Harper (2002) and Barros
(2003).
19
The Framework Step 6 Alliance Critical Success
Factors Evaluation and Relationship Management
Critical Success Factors for Company C (A and B
Joint Venture)
Source Elaborated by authors from the case and
Bower (1999), Besanko, Dranove and Shanley
(2000), Grant (2002), Harper (2002) and Barros
(2003).
20
The Framework Step 6 Alliance Critical Success
Factors Evaluation and Relationship Management
  • Development of a detailed strategic business
    plan, creating a road map that orchestrates the
    activities of all work groups, and intervening
    when the launch process veers off track.

21
Theoretical Implications
  • Strategic and marketing management are
    fundamental designing the JV
  • Transaction cost economics is fundamental
    discussing the best governance option
  • The organization behavior is then very important
    to run the new business in its new environment
    and on the understanding phase.

22
Managerial Contributions and Implications
  • In the search for competitive advantages,
    companies form joint ventures to better explore
    the competencies and to join efforts.
  • The framework can help to guide firms in their
    decision making process along the joint venture
    formation.
  • There are high costs in the phase of elaboration
    a contract, defining objectives and setting the
    necessary safeguards. This framework can help to
    reduce, adding more points to discussion.

23
Limitations
  • The framework has been successfully used just in
    two cases. (Crystalsev and this one)
  • Each market has its particularities and
    therefore using this framework in other
    industries may require some adaptations.
  • Next steps more applications (cases/projects)
    and theory contributions to improve sequence
    proposed to a more robust one.

24

Thank you for your attention.
mfaneves_at_usp.br www.pensa.org.br
www.fearp.usp.br/fava
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com