Title: Walkthrough of the Indicators
1Walkthrough of the Indicators
- Working towards a consistent understanding and
application of scoring criteria.
2PILLAR I - Indicator 1 Legislative and
Regulatory Framework
- Sub-indicator 1(a) Scope of application and
coverage of the legislative and regulatory
framework. - Sub-indicator 1(b) Procurement Methods
- Sub-indicator 1(c) Advertising rules and time
limits - Sub-indicator 1(d) - Participation
3Indicator 1 continued
- Sub-indicator 1(e) Documentation and
specifications - Sub-indicator 1(f) Evaluation and award
criteria - Sub-indicator 1(g) Submission, receipt and
opening of tenders - Sub-indicator 1 (h) - Complaints
4PILLAR I - Indicator 2- Implementing Regulations
and Documentation
- Sub-indicator 2(a) Implementing regulations
- Sub-indicator 2(b) Model documents for goods,
works and services - Sub-indicator 2(c) Pre-qualifications
- Sub-indicator 2(d) Contracting for services
- Sub-indicator 2(e) Users guide or manuals
- Sub-indicator 2(f) General conditions of
contract (GCC)
5PILLAR II Indicator 3 Procurement is
integrated into governance system
- Sub-indicator 3(a) Procurement planning is part
of budget formulation and contributes to
multiyear planning. - Sub-indicator 3(b) Budget law supports
procurement, contract execution payment - Sub-indicator 3(c) No procurement initiated w/o
budget appropriation - Sub-indicator 3(d) Completion reports prepared
for reconciliation with budget
6Pillar II Indicator 4 Normative/regulatory
body
- Sub-indicator 4 (a) Status and basis for body
covered in legislative framework - Sub-indicator 4(b) Body has a defined set of
responsibilities - Sub-indicator 4(c) Bodys funding, staffing and
independence are consistent with responsibilities - Sub-indicator 4(d) Responsibilities are clear
and avoid conflict of interest and direct
involvement in procurement
7Pillar II Indicator 5 Institutional
Development Capacity
- Sub-indicator 5(a) System for collecting and
disseminating information - Sub-indicator 5(b) System for collecting and
monitoring procurement statistics - Sub-indicator 5(c) Sustainable training
strategy and capacity to implement - Sub-indicator 5(d) Quality standards for
staffing and to monitor performance
8PILLAR III Indicator 6 Operations and
practices are efficient
- Sub-indicator 6(a) Level of competency of
procurement officials is consistent with their
level of responsibility - Sub-indicator 6(b) Training and information
programs are consistent with demand - Sub-indicator 6(c) Established norms for
safekeeping of records and documents - Sub-indicator 6(d) Provision for delegating
authority
9PILLAR III Indicator 7 The public procurement
market
- Sub-indicator 7(a) Effective mechanisms for
partnerships between public and private sector - Sub-indicator 7(b) Private sector institutions
are organized and able to facilitate access - Sub-indicator 7(c) No major systemic
constraints inhibiting access
10PILLAR III Indicator 8 Contract
administration and dispute resolution
- Sub-indicator 8(a) Contract administration
procedures are clearly defined and cover
inspection/acceptance, amendments, and quality
control - Sub-indicator 8(b) Contract include dispute
resolution procedures - Sub-indicator 8(c) - Procedures exist to enforce
the outcome of dispute resolution process.
11PILLAR IV Indictor 9 Effective Control and
Audit Systems
- Sub-indicator 9(a) Control Framework in place
to provide for internal/external controls and
audit - Sub-indicator 9(b) Enforcement and follow-up on
findings and recommendations to foster compliance - Sub-indicator 9(c) Internal controls provide
timely information to enable management action - Sub-indicator 9(d) Internal control system
supports performance auditing - Sub-indicator 9(e) Auditors are sufficiently
informed about procurement to conduct quality
audits
12PILLAR IV Indicator 10 Efficiency of Appeals
Mechanism
- Sub-indicator 10(a) Decisions made on basis of
information final decisions reviewed
enforcement capacity under the law. - Sub-indicator 10(b) Capacity to handle
complaints efficiently and means to enforce
remedy - Sub-indicator 10(c) System is fair with
decisions balanced and justified - Sub-indicator 10(d) Decisions are published and
available to public - Sub-indicator 10(e) - Complaint review body has
authority and independence
13PILLAR IV Indicator 11- Degree of Access to
Information
- Sub-indicator 11(a) Information is published
and distributed through available media and is
supported by information technology when feasible
14PILLAR IV Indicator 12 Ethics and
Anti-corruption measures in place
- Sub-indicator 12(a) The legal framework and
procurement documents include provision
addressing corruption, fraud, conflict of
interest and unethical behavior - Sub-indicator 12(b) Legal system define
responsibilities, accountabilities and penalties
for individuals/firms found to have engaged in
fraud or corruption - Sub-indicator 12(c) Evidence of enforcement
exists
15Indicator 12 continued
- Sub-indicator 12(d) Special measures exist with
regard to fraud and corruption in procurement - Sub-indicator 12(e) Stakeholders support the
creation of a market known for its integrity and
ethical behavior. - Sub-indicator 12(f) Secure mechanism for
reporting fraud and corruption - Sub-indicator 12(g) Codes of Conduct and
disclosure for staff in decision-making positions