Chapter III Duty A' Introduction

1
Chapter III Duty A. Introduction

• The prima facie case in negligence
• Duty
• Landowner / occupier
• 1) For activities or conditions on the land
• 2) For failing to prevent harm by third parties
• Breach
• Causation
• Damages

2
Chapter III Landowners Occupiers The Duty to
Prevent Criminal Acts

• Problem Landowners and Occupiers (2)
• When is there an obligation to take steps to
  prevent crime by a third party?
• What kind of relationships give rise to a duty?
• What triggers the obligation?
• Specific harm rule
• Prior, similar incidents test
• Totality of the circumstances test
• Balancing approach

3
Chapter III Governmental Entities
Problem Landowners and Occupiers (2) Would
the limited duty rule in Riss apply?
4
Chapter III Landowners Occupiers The Duty to
Prevent Criminal Acts
Problem Landowners and Occupiers (2) Would the
limited duty rule in Riss apply? Police assumed
duty direct communication reliance. Weiner
(subway, no duty to prevent assault) OR Lopez
(bus case, rejecting resource arguments
5
Chapter III Duty A. Introduction
The prima facie case in negligence Duty
Riss Breach Causation Damages The
Defenses Contributory negligence / comparative
fault Immunities sovereign / governmental
immunity
6
Chapter III DutyGovernmental Entities
Municipal and State Liability
Sovereign Immunity Federal Torts Claims Act --
p. 249 California Government Code Section 815
ff.
7
Cal. Gov. Code 911.2.  Times for presentment of
claims    A claim relating to a cause of action
for death or for injury to person or to personal
property or growing crops shall be presented as
provided in Article 2 (commencing with Section
915) of this chapter not later than six months
after the accrual of the cause of action. A claim
relating to any other cause of action shall be
presented as provided in Article 2 (commencing
with Section 915) of this chapter not later than
one year after the accrual of the cause of
action.
8
Chapter III Duty Review Summary
The prima facie case in negligence Duty Is
there an obligation to use reasonable
care? Breach What does reasonable care
require? Causation Damages
9
Chapter III Duty Review Summary
DUTY Is there an obligation to use reasonable
care? BREACH Under the circumstances, did the
actor behave reasonably?
Question of law, judge decides based on
precedent.
General
Question of fact, jury decides
Specific
10
Chapter III Duty Review Summary

• Areas of no duty
• No duty to warn / rescue / protect another
  unless
• Special relationship to injured person
• Undertaking to aid
• Special relationship to person causing harm
• Created risk through
• Affirmative acts
• Negligent misrepresentation
• Negligent entrustment

11
Chapter III Duty Review Summary

• Areas of limited duty
• Limited duties of utilities
• Car key cases / special circumstances test
• Limited duty in landowner cases
• For activities or artificial conditions
• For harm threatened by others (crimes on
  property)

12
Chapter III Duty Review Summary
The broad themes Explicit invocation of policy
to limit liability Tug of war between judge and
jury
13
Chapter III Duty The Rowland test
We depart from this fundamental principle only
upon the balancing of a number of
considerations 1) foreseeability of harm to the
plaintiff 2) degree of certainty that the
plaintiff suffered injury 3) closeness of
connection between the defendants conduct and
the injury suffered 4) moral blame attached to
the defendants conduct 5) the policy of
preventing future harm 6) the extent of the
burden to the defendant and consequences to the
community of imposing a duty 7) the
availability, cost, and prevalence of insurance
14
Chapter III Duty The Rowland test 1

• foreseeability For
• certainty Certain
• 3) closeness of connection Close
• 4) moral blame Morals
• 5) preventing future harm Prevent the future
• 6) Burden Burden of
• 7) insurance of Insurance

15
Chapter III Duty The Rowland test 2

• foreseeability F
• Degree of certainty C
• 3) closeness of connection C
• 4) moral blame Must
• 5) preventing future harm Please
• 6) Burden Broadcast
• 7) insurance of Industry

16
Chapter III Duty The Rowland test 3

• Degree of certainty California
• closeness of connection Court
• foreseeability Factors
• moral blame May
• insurance of Impose
• preventing future harm Personal
• Burden Burden

17
Chapter III Duty The Rowland test 4

• foreseeability Fraternity
• Degree of certainty Drinking can
• 3) closeness of connection Create overstated
  cuteness
• 4) moral blame Many Budweisers
• 5) preventing future harm Promise Future
  Hotness
• 6) Burden By
• 7) insurance of Intoxication

18
Chapter III Duty The Rowland test 5

• moral blame My
• foreseeability Flamboyant
• Degree of certainty College
• preventing future harm Professor
• insurance Imitates
• closeness of connection Cher
• Burden Beautifully

19
Chapter IV The Duty Requirement Non-physical
Harm.
A. Emotional HarmB. Economic Harm
20
Chapter IV
Duty Emotional Distress physical injury,
emotional distress follows threat of physical
injury, emotional distress results direct
victim of conduct that creates an unreasonable
risk of emotional distress distress at injury
to another Breach Causation Damages
Recurring fact patterns
21
Assignment
Thursday 282-297 (297-301 suggested, but
not required) Thursday 341-349, 358 n.5 n.7
(Skip Zuchowitz, p. 349)