802'11s Proposal Joint SEEMeshWiMesh Proposal to 802'11 TGs - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 14
About This Presentation
Title:

802'11s Proposal Joint SEEMeshWiMesh Proposal to 802'11 TGs

Description:

1. 802.11s Proposal - Joint SEE-Mesh/Wi-Mesh Proposal to ... MP4. Common. Channel. Data. Channel n. Data. Channel m. CTX. SIFS. CTX. SIFS. RTX. DIFS. DIFS. DATA ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:30
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 15
Provided by: csieNc
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: 802'11s Proposal Joint SEEMeshWiMesh Proposal to 802'11 TGs


1
802.11s Proposal - Joint SEE-Mesh/Wi-Mesh
Proposal to 802.11 TGs
  • IEEE 802.11-06/0328r0
  • Feb 2006
  • This proposal can be obtained from
    http//www.802wirelessworld.com/.

2
Current 802.11s Proposals
Table from Proposals for TGs, IEEE
802.11-05/0597r20
3
Outline
  • General Description
  • Mesh Topology Discovery and Formation
  • NEW! Path Selection Hybrid Wireless Mesh
    Protocol (HWMP)
  • Interworking Support
  • NEW! Multi-Channel Support (CCF) (optional)

4
3. Path Selection Hybrid Wireless Mesh Protocol
(HWMP)
  • Combines the flexibility of on-demand route
    discovery with the option for efficient proactive
    routing to a mesh portal
  • On demand service is based on Radio Metric AODV
    (RM-AODV)
  • same as the SEE-mesh
  • When a root portal is not configured, RM-AODV is
    used to discover routes to destinations in the
    mesh
  • Pro-active routing is not for all links it is a
    tree-based routing
  • If a Root portal is present, a distance vector
    routing tree is built and maintained
  • advantage
  • most traffics are destined to the Root
  • can reduce unnecessary route discovery flooding

5
  • Path Selection Protocol RMAODV
  • Radio Metric Ad hoc On-Demand Distance Vector
  • Summary of features beyond AODV
  • Identify best-metric path with arbitrary path
    metrics
  • Reduce flooding when maintaining multiple paths
  • Aggregate multiple RREQs in same message
  • Modification to RREQ/RREP processing/forwarding
    rules
  • Forward RREQ with better metric
  • No route caching
  • Optional periodic path maintenance
  • Allows proactive maintenance of routes to popular
    destinations (e.g. MPP)

6
HWMP Example 1 No Root, Destination Inside the
Mesh
  • Example MP 4 wants to communicate with MP 9
  • MP 4 first checks its local forwarding table for
    an active forwarding entry to MP 9
  • If no active path exists, MP 4 sends a RREQ to
    discover the best path to MP 9
  • MP 9 replies to the RREQ with a RREP to establish
    a bi-directional path for data forwarding
  • MP 4 begins data communication with MP 9

On-demand path
7
HWMP Example 2 Non-Root Portal(s), Destination
Outside the Mesh
  • Example MP 4 wants to communicate with X
  • MP 4 first checks its local forwarding table for
    an active forwarding entry to X
  • If no active path exists, MP 4 sends a RREQ to
    discover the best path to X
  • When no RREP received, MP 4 assumes X is outside
    the mesh and sends messages destined to X to Mesh
    Portal(s) for interworking
  • MP 1 forwards messages to other LAN segments
    according to locally implemented interworking

On-demand path
8
HWMP Example 3 Root Portal,Destination Outside
the Mesh
  • Example MP 4 wants to communicate with X
  • MP 4 first checks its local forwarding table for
    an active forwarding entry to X
  • If no active path exists, MP 4 may immediately
    forward the message on the proactive path toward
    the Root MP 1
  • When MP 1 receives the message, if it does not
    have an active forwarding entry to X it may
    assume the destination is outside the mesh and
    forward on other LAN segments according to
    locally implemented interworking
  • Note No broadcast discovery required when
    destination is outside of the mesh

Root
Proactive path
9
HWMP Example 4 With Root,Destination Inside
the Mesh
  • Example MP 4 wants to communicate with MP 9
  • MP 4 first checks its local forwarding table for
    an active forwarding entry to MP 9
  • If no active path exists, MP 4 may immediately
    forward the message on the proactive path toward
    the Root MP 1
  • When MP 1 receives the message, it flags the
    message as intra-mesh and forwards on the
    proactive path to MP 9
  • When MP 9 receives the message, it may issue an
    on-demand RREQ to MP 4 to establish the best
    intra-mesh MP-to-MP path for future messages

Root
Proactive path
On-demand path
10
5. Multi-Channel Support Common Channel
Framework (CCF)
  • Using RTX, the transmitter suggests a destination
    channel. (RTX ? RTS)
  • Receiver accepts/declines the suggested channel
    using CTX. (CTX ? CTS)
  • After a successful RTX/CTX exchange, the
    transmitter and receiver switch to the
    destination channel.
  • Switching is limited to channels with little
    activity.
  • Existing medium access schemes are reused.

11
CCF Example (1)
MP3
MP1
MP4
MP2
CommonChannel
RTX
DataChannel n
DataChannel m
12
Channel Coordination
  • To increase channel utilization, a channel
    coordination window (CCW) is defined on the
    common channel.
  • P is the period with which CCW is repeated.
  • MPs should stay tuned to CCW, and may remain in
    the common channel beyond CCW duration.
  • P and CCW are carried in beacons.
  • At the start of CCW, CCF enabled MPs tune to the
    common channel.
  • This facilitates all MPs to get connected.
  • Channel Utilization Vector (U) of each MP is
    reset.
  • MPs mark a channel as unavailable based on
    information read from RTX/CTX frames.

13
CCF Example (2)
14
Conclusions
  • SEE-Mesh Wi-Mesh for IEEE 802.11s
  • New materials
  • Hybrid path selection protocol (RM-AODV
    tree-based DSDV)
  • Multi-channel support (Channel coordination
    function)
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com